Channel
@lambton_cube_net
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002182794546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lambton_cube_net |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lambton_cube_net |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 6 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 7 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 7 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 74.2% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 25.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㅤпогода просто отвратная. не знаю, чего ещё я ожидал от весны, но всё равно... ㅤк тому же это служит напоминанием о том, что я уже не в той форме, в которой был ещё пару лет назад. с некоторых пор у меня к холодам ломит кости. не знаю, почему для некоторых так сложно это принять — я рад поделиться даже своими слабостями, если это не о работе.
❤2
ㅤу вас не бывает мыслей, что вы двигаетесь не в том направлении? я точно знаю, что я именно там, где и должен быть, но что-то ощущается неправильно последний +-месяц. надеюсь, пройдёт.
❤1
ㅤиногда жизнь приводит людей в очень странные места, даже если ещё вчера они и подумать не могли, что здесь окажутся. это даже смешно. а бывает и наоборот—всю жизнь ждёшь чуда на одном месте, а оно так и не случается...
❤2
ㅤвы знаете, я ведь уже смирился с неизбежным. но все же... я не могу не скучать по людям, с которыми когда-то был близок, кем дорожил. у вас бывает такое? когда живешь спокойно, а потом вспоминаешь человека, которого уже давно нет, и что-то словно рушится?
❤2
ㅤ ㅤкакая гадость. думаю, я оправданно не люблю зиму. ㅤа я вот делаю шаг, и у меня нога едет быстрее чем я успеваю опомниться. кто же мог подумать, что там настолько скользко будет?
❤1
ㅤ ㅤай, беда... как так вышло? сильно болят?
❤1
ㅤдоброй ночи. хотя, "доброй" — это громко сказано. ㅤсегодня, когда вышел из здания и спускался по лестнице, каким-то образом поскользнулся и очень неприятно ударился спиной. встать сам смог, но под вечер она только сильнее разболелась. где я так провинился? ㅤневажно. вы сами как? живы, здоровы?
❤1
ㅤ ㅤприличное количество, спасибо. просто некогда, я полагаю.
❤1🕊1
ㅤ ㅤдля начала — женщиной. а в остальном, я бы не сказал, что у меня есть определённый типаж... сложно.
❤1🕊1
ㅤ ㅤне уверен, что у меня будет достаточно времени уделять внимание "наследнику". да и на данный момент у меня ни на кого глаз не лежит.
❤2
ㅤ ㅤвы знаете, мне говорили, но я совершенно забыл... это не так важно, будет ещё время переспросить. но сам факт! давно так не радовался за кого-либо кроме самого себя.
❤1🕊1
ㅤ ㅤповод! у дорогого мне... так скажем, коллеги, сын родился, вы представляете? просто чудо.
❤1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lambton_cube_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,288,180 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ʟᴀᴍʙᴛᴏɴ's ᴅɪᴀʀʏ.” (@lambton_cube_net), 6 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lambton_cube_net.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.