Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Уютная комната любителей уцц

@lahima_ri

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

174subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003593615055
TypeChannel
Username@lahima_ri
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lahima_ri

Growth

174175174.510 Aug 2026, 00:17 — 175 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:30 — 175 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:14 — 174 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:1710 Aug 2026, 19:14
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 174–175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:14174-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:30175no change
10 Aug 2026, 00:17175first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.1%
avg views ÷ 174 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.3
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,260
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘4130.4%
🕊2619.3%
custom 53417685382039168151712.6%
custom 5249009601231224691139.63%
❤‍🔥139.63%
🍓85.93%
💋75.19%
custom 525120709977338675553.70%
custom 528511515790569075353.70%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

- 😭😭😭

💘4custom 52512070997733867552🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC57 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

- надеюсь что нет))💄 #анон

💘6❤‍🔥1🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC56 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

- два эскимо.. 😲 Что за расспрос, ахаха (Я не вижу в этом минусов) #анон

custom 53417685382039168159❤‍🔥1💘1🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC52 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

- два эскимо, люблю эскимо🥺 #анон

💋6❤‍🔥1🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ссылочка: http://t.me/anonquebot?start=vvi1jf3

🕊5❤‍🔥1custom 52851151579056907531

8 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC53 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬 🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🎀 если у вас есть вопросы ко мне, или пожелания – может всегда написать ко мне в анонимку! На все сообщения обязательно отвечу и выдвину на канал! - решила чуть разрядить обстановку, жду ваших сообщений😛

🕊6custom 52851151579056907532❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC56 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 [😵]~ «Я ОЧЕНЬ БОЮСЬ..-» - интерактивчик вам подкинула! Люблю вас😴 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

💘6🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

[🕊]Вопросики на каждый день(?) •😔😔😔😔😔• Вы предпочитаете быть в одиночестве, или в компании друзей? •😔😔😔😔😔• - и то и другое<3 Но все-же, я люблю одиночество только если надо перезарядить социальную батарейку📱 💫✨💫✨💫✨💫✨ #Вопросики_дня

💘4🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💘2🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

- всем доброго дня Сегодня кину интерактив, милые! Всех люблю и целую🫶

custom 52851151579056907532💘1🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC62 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🖤🖤🖤🖤

💘4custom 53417685382039168152🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

|🪻|Вопросики на каждый день(?) ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Поезд или самолёт? ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ - поезд🥳 Всегда любила их больше) ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #Вопросики_дня

❤‍🔥6🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lahima_ri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 677,216 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уютная комната любителей уцц” (@lahima_ri), 174 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lahima_ri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.