Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πΏπ’œ π’’π‘…π’œπ’© π‘€πΈπ’©π’―πΌπ‘…π’œ ❸❸

Channel

πΏπ’œ π’’π‘…π’œπ’© π‘€πΈπ’©π’―πΌπ‘…π’œ ❸❸

@lagranmentira33

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

7,653subscribers

-68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001588594104
TypeChannel
Username@lagranmentira33
Descriptionhttps://www.tiktok.com/@lagranmentira33?_t=8r0N5aoUVkH&_r=1 https://www.instagram.com/lagranmentira33?igsh=MTliNXVjc3pjOW93MA== https://youtube.com/@lagranmentira33?si=QF34klFTxhO3e9ff
Created25 June 2021 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lagranmentira33

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6097,7227,665.57 August 2026 β€” 7,721 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 7,721 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 7,722 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 7,713 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 7,707 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 7,696 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 7,690 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 7,669 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 7,660 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 7,650 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 7,640 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 7,634 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 7,621 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 7,614 subscribers18 September 2026 β€” 7,609 subscribers28 September 2026 β€” 7,711 subscribers5 October 2026 β€” 7,699 subscribers12 October 2026 β€” 7,690 subscribers15 October 2026 β€” 7,687 subscribers19 October 2026 β€” 7,677 subscribers22 October 2026 β€” 7,674 subscribers25 October 2026 β€” 7,671 subscribers28 October 2026 β€” 7,666 subscribers31 October 2026 β€” 7,663 subscribers3 November 2026 β€” 7,662 subscribers5 November 2026 β€” 7,653 subscribers7,6537 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,592–7,739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:367,653-9
3 Nov 2026, 01:577,662-1
31 Oct 2026, 02:547,663-3
28 Oct 2026, 02:387,666-5
25 Oct 2026, 05:167,671-3
22 Oct 2026, 11:157,674-3
19 Oct 2026, 05:307,677-10
15 Oct 2026, 23:267,687-3
12 Oct 2026, 14:067,690-9
5 Oct 2026, 18:177,699-12
28 Sept 2026, 03:187,711+102
18 Sept 2026, 19:557,609-5
14 Sept 2026, 10:597,614-7
11 Sept 2026, 03:577,621-13
6 Sept 2026, 02:197,634-6
1 Sept 2026, 18:477,640-10
29 Aug 2026, 13:147,650-10
26 Aug 2026, 06:177,660-9
23 Aug 2026, 11:157,669-21
20 Aug 2026, 04:437,690first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
6.80%
avg views Γ· 7,653 subscribers
Avg views / post
520
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.911%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held34 (4 May 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total1,561
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ3,920
Videos
β‰ˆ2,050
Links
β‰ˆ4,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 22m
Average length
16m 54s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 32 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘4626.0%
❀3218.1%
πŸ”₯2313.0%
πŸ‘Œ2111.9%
😒105.65%
πŸ’―84.52%
πŸŽ‰52.82%
πŸ–•52.82%
🀬52.82%
πŸ‘42.26%
🀩42.26%
😁31.69%
🀯31.69%
πŸ₯΄31.69%
πŸ€”21.13%
😱10.565%
🀨10.565%
πŸ₯°10.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own β€˜edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC496 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://youtu.be/tI2TbW2OfO0?is=eLHY9JZGlElb9O8x

πŸ–•1🀩1

30 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC492 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Esto es lo mΓ‘ximo jajajaja todo consiste en seguir inyectando a todo el mundo … a estos hdlgp hay que exterminarlos. κ§β˜¬Γšβ„•π”Όπ•‹π”Ό π”Έπ•ƒβ„‚π”Έβ„•π”Έπ•ƒβ˜¬κ§‚ βšœοΈπ•™π•₯π•₯𝕑𝕀://π•₯.π•žπ•–/π•π•’π•˜π•£π•’π•Ÿπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯π•šπ•£π•’πŸ›πŸ›βšœοΈ

πŸ”₯4πŸ–•2πŸ‘Œ1

29 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC573 viewsread 6 November 2026

Aqui en EspaΓ±a tenemos que estar Tranquilos porque del apagon y sus 10 muertos y de Adamuz con 46 no sabemos nada.….. y ahora en campaΓ±a electoral van a crucificar a un empleado, en 2 horas, rapidΓ­simo. Y si no tranquilos que sino contratan unos narcos extremeΓ±os y se limpian una jueza y a sus hijas lo que haga falta … ya el tito Berni y su sobrino traen la juerga, a zapatero lo han dejado tasando joyas en la joyerΓ­a…

6 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTCβ‰ˆ1,360 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Empiezan a circular rumores sobre una nueva plandemia procedente de Rusia. 𝔼ℕ𝕃𝔸ℂ𝔼 πŸ”Ž κ§β˜¬Γšβ„•π”Όπ•‹π”Ό π”Έπ•ƒβ„‚π”Έβ„•π”Έπ•ƒβ˜¬κ§‚ βšœοΈπ•™π•₯π•₯𝕑𝕀://π•₯.π•žπ•–/π•π•’π•˜π•£π•’π•Ÿπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯π•šπ•£π•’πŸ›πŸ›βšœοΈ

🀬5πŸ–•2😁2

6 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTCβ‰ˆ1,400 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Un trabajador de Correos con 25 aΓ±os de experiencia en la gestiΓ³n del voto por correo ha publicado este martes un hilo en el que distingue entre la seguridad del voto individual y lo que describe como grietas del sistema que, a su juicio, permitirΓ­an alterar resultados sin tocar la papeleta de quien sΓ­ vota. Ilde Ruiz Padilla, colaborador de JaΓ©n Hoy y exdiputado provincial, insiste en que no aporta pruebas de un fra…

πŸ‘7

13 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTCβ‰ˆ1,510 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://youtu.be/tWeLNGGbaOA?is=56qiHrNa3XO3GhqS Apoyen y compartan no cuesta nada

❀2

4 Sept 2026, 19:27 UTCβ‰ˆ1,780 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @hermanosbareaPhoto

CAPÍTULO 2: LA FUGA DE HITLER https://hermanosbarea.tv/video/capitulo-2-la-fuga-de-hitler/ DespuΓ©s del primer capΓ­tulo sobre β€œLa falsa autopsia de Hitler” nos sumergimos en la conocida β€œRuta de las ratas”. ΒΏHitler se escapΓ³? La respuesta corta es sΓ­. La larga puedes verla en este segundo capΓ­tulo sobre la historia no contada de Adolf Hitler. El revisionista histΓ³rico Jordi Barea nos acerca las investigaciones de Ab…

πŸ‘4❀3πŸ‘Œ1

1 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTCβ‰ˆ1,720 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @nurparatodos81Photo

19.30hs esp // 14.30hs Arg // https://youtube.com/live/iBjYBT3_drA?feature=share

❀2

26 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTCβ‰ˆ2,440 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

No sΓ© si las estrellas estΓ‘n ahΓ­ para darnos respuestas o para hacernos las preguntas correctas. ✨ Durante siglos hemos mirado al cielo buscando comprender quiΓ©nes somos. Pero quizΓ‘ el universo exterior tambiΓ©n sea un espejo de nuestro mundo interior. MΓ‘s allΓ‘ de los sΓ­mbolos y las creencias, la verdadera exploraciΓ³n comienza cuando observamos nuestros pensamientos, cuestionamos lo aprendido y reconocemos nuestros …

πŸ‘4πŸ’―3🀨1πŸ₯°1

23 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTCβ‰ˆ1,580 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

Mapa de Urbano Monte full HD para descargar y compartir κ§β˜¬Γšβ„•π”Όπ•‹π”Ό π”Έπ•ƒβ„‚π”Έβ„•π”Έπ•ƒβ˜¬κ§‚ βšœοΈπ•™π•₯π•₯𝕑𝕀://π•₯.π•žπ•–/π•π•’π•˜π•£π•’π•Ÿπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯π•šπ•£π•’πŸ›πŸ›βšœοΈ

πŸ‘Œ1

22 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTCβ‰ˆ1,460 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/g-K27x2v7pY?is=zsU-UWdE8ifhdmcS

❀1πŸ‘Œ1

21 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTCβ‰ˆ1,500 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ‘9🀯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @lagranmentira33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@lagranmentira33 edited 1 post after it first published β€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπΏπ’œ π’’π‘…π’œπ’© π‘€πΈπ’©π’―πΌπ‘…π’œ ❸❸” (@lagranmentira33), 7,653 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lagranmentira33.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.