«كل علاقة بدايتها لا ترضي الله نهايتها لا ترضيك» — Бошланиши Аллоҳга хуш келмаган ҳар қандай муносабатнинг ниҳояси сенга ҳам хуш келмайди. https://t.me/laa_tahzan92
👍9❤7🔥1

Channel
@laa_tahzan92
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,392subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001252670608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laa_tahzan92 |
| Created | 29 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laa_tahzan92 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 1,392 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 1,395 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 1,402 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:03 | 1,409 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 1,408 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 1,407 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 1,411 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 1,414 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 1,415 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 1,420 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 1,423 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,424 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 1,424 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
131 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 65 | 49.6% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 9.92% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 9.16% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 8.40% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @laa_tahzan92. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«كل علاقة بدايتها لا ترضي الله نهايتها لا ترضيك» — Бошланиши Аллоҳга хуш келмаган ҳар қандай муносабатнинг ниҳояси сенга ҳам хуш келмайди. https://t.me/laa_tahzan92
👍9❤7🔥1
"Qilgan gunohlaringizni yashirganingiz kabi, qilgan yaxshiliklaringizni ham saqlang". Usmon roziyallohu anhu. https://t.me/laa_tahzan92
❤6
_Oʻzgaribsanmi? _Ha, namoz boshladim. Namozni boshlaganingizda hayotingizda gullar ochilishni boshlaydi. https://t.me/laa_tahzan92
❤7👍2💯2
7-8 yil avval shu postni yozgan ekanman. U paytlar gavjumlikni yoqtirganman shekilli. Yoshim katta boʻlgan sari oz boʻlsin, soz boʻlsin deydigan boʻlganman. Kanal aʼzolari ham u payt 5000 atrofida edi)
❤9👍5🔥2
Bolaligimizda onam yerda non ushogʻini koʻrsa "teparoqqa olib qoʻy, qushlar yeb ketadi" derdi. Sevganlarimizni doim yuksakda tutishga oʻrgangandik. Ajabo, nega koʻrinishmaydi, qushlar yeb ketdimikin ? https://t.me/laa_tahzan92
👍6🔥6😢3
“Зиндонларнинг энг ёмони - ахлоқи ахлоқига мос келмайдиган инсонларнинг бир жойда яшашидир”. 🪶 Умар ибн Хаттоб родияллоҳу анҳу
💯10❤3👍3
— 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐜𝐡𝐚, 𝐛𝐚𝐱𝐭 𝐧𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐚? — 𝐁𝐚𝐱𝐭 𝐛𝐮 𝐬𝐡𝐮𝐤𝐫𝐝𝐚... — 𝐐𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐪𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐚?! — 𝐒𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐲𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐚𝐫 𝐛𝐢𝐫 𝐳𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐚 𝐬𝐡𝐮𝐤𝐫 𝐪𝐢𝐥, 𝐤𝐨‘𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧 𝐧𝐞’𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐢 𝐬𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐱𝐭𝐥𝐢 𝐪𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐢. 𝐇𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨 𝐪𝐮𝐯𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐧 𝐲𝐢𝐠ʻ𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬𝐚𝐧... https://t.me/laa_tahzan92
❤7
Ассалому алайкум ва роҳматуллоҳи ва барокатуҳу! Қурбон ҳайити муборак бўлсин! Аллоҳ таоло қилган амалларимизни бизлардан ҳам, сизлардан ҳам қабул қилсин! Аллоҳу акбар! Аллоҳу акбар! Лаа илааҳа иллаллоҳу валлоҳу акбар! Аллоҳу акбар ва лиллааҳил ҳамд.
❤2
Baxtning eng ulug‘ va asosiy sababi — bu iymon va solih amallardir. Alloh taolo aytadi: “Erkakmi yoki ayolmi — kim mo‘min bo‘lgan holda yaxshi amal qilsa, albatta, Biz unga pokiza hayot ato eturmiz va qilgan amallarining eng go‘zali bilan mukofotlaymiz.” (Nahl surasi, 97-oyat) Alloh taolo iymon va solih amallarni o‘zida jamlagan kishiga bu dunyoda go‘zal hayotni va’da qildi, shuningdek, oxiratda ham go‘zal mukofot …
❤7
Allohga to‘g‘ri iymon bilan ishongan kishilar — bu iymonlari sababli solih amallar qiladigan, qalblarini, axloqlarini hamda dunyoviy va oxirat hayotlarini isloh qiladigan insonlardir. Ularda o‘zlariga quvonch va saodat keltiradigan narsalarni qanday qarshi olish kerakligi, shuningdek bezovtalik, tashvish va g‘am keltiradigan narsalarga qanday munosabatda bo‘lish kerakligi haqida mustahkam asos va to‘g‘ri mezonlar mav…
Hech bir rohatga gulzorlardan o’tib borilmaydi. Jannat ham hatto o’limni talab qiladi…
❤4
Siz bizni qachondan kuzatasiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @laa_tahzan92. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Siz bizni qachondan kuzatasiz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Laa tahzan” (@laa_tahzan92), 1,392 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laa_tahzan92.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.