Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for le.vi.x

Channel

le.vi.x

@l3vix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003980810594
TypeChannel
Username@l3vix
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 4 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/l3vix

Growth

378 August 2026 — 37 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:4637no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:3137first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
245.1%
avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.7
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,451
Reactions total281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
47
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54699579574814346505015.3%
custom 52603770568138101553611.0%
custom 53954783197161415853310.1%
custom 5398009236569486705309.20%
custom 5433941280860180664288.59%
custom 5199647821271166438226.75%
custom 5431637816884891528226.75%
custom 5208658503744389574164.91%
custom 5471997388342198903154.60%
custom 5422371596742455590144.29%
custom 5465659060290360771133.99%
custom 5418242393709256911113.37%
custom 543408770059026944882.45%
custom 539788844490925481372.15%
custom 542914375085093666872.15%
custom 528968627871393222851.53%
custom 543392955559946117851.53%
custom 543594094032378521441.23%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @l3vix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC13 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

I only call you when it's half past five

custom 53978884449092548134custom 53980092365694867054custom 54699579574814346503custom 53954783197161415852custom 51996478212711664381custom 54223715967424555901

8 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC23 views16 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

💥💥

custom 53980092365694867057custom 54339412808601806643custom 51996478212711664382custom 53954783197161415852custom 54699579574814346501custom 54719973883421989031

6 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC129 views21 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

он как moonlight

custom 54699579574814346509custom 53954783197161415854custom 54223715967424555904custom 53980092365694867052custom 53978884449092548131custom 54339412808601806641

5 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

кьо этность😂

custom 52603770568138101558custom 53954783197161415853custom 54699579574814346503custom 53980092365694867051custom 54339412808601806641

4 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC96 views18 reactions8 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

мимимамаму

custom 54699579574814346508custom 52603770568138101555custom 53954783197161415853custom 51996478212711664382

1 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC72 views20 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

теория идеально подобранного звука

custom 54699579574814346507custom 51996478212711664385custom 53954783197161415854custom 52603770568138101553custom 53980092365694867051

1 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC92 views15 reactions13 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

суган из 📍вращенец

custom 53954783197161415855custom 53980092365694867054custom 51996478212711664383custom 54339412808601806642custom 52603770568138101551

30 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC144 views12 reactions4 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

vip person

custom 53980092365694867053custom 54339412808601806643custom 51996478212711664382custom 54699579574814346502custom 53978884449092548131custom 54719973883421989031

29 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC115 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

почему такой грустный звук

custom 54339412808601806645custom 52603770568138101554custom 53954783197161415854custom 51996478212711664382custom 53980092365694867051custom 54223715967424555901

28 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC58 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

это кто

custom 54223715967424555906custom 54699579574814346504custom 52603770568138101553custom 54719973883421989033custom 51996478212711664382custom 54339412808601806641

27 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC95 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

джунен типо джо голдберг

custom 54699579574814346506custom 52603770568138101555custom 54339412808601806645custom 53980092365694867052custom 54719973883421989032custom 51996478212711664381custom 53954783197161415851custom 53978884449092548131

26 Jul 2026, 23:02 UTC116 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

нормальных эдитов не будет

custom 54719973883421989037custom 53980092365694867054custom 54699579574814346504custom 51996478212711664382custom 54339412808601806642custom 52603770568138101551

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @l3vix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 257,044 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“le.vi.x” (@l3vix), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/l3vix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.