Channel

ささやく K.

@l0v3lyyss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1004344516770
Type	Channel
Username	@l0v3lyyss
Created	21 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	13 August 2026
Last confirmed live	25 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/l0v3lyyss

Growth

3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–5 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
18 Aug 2026, 04:42	5	+1
13 Aug 2026, 07:02	4	no change
10 Aug 2026, 17:15	4	first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,468,215 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

my info.
@c4tshs1 · 231 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 1; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 1; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 0; vacant every time we have ever looked

@l0v3lyyss named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Evidenced gone

We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.

@imtpywonyng
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ささやく K.” (@l0v3lyyss), 5 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/l0v3lyyss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.