Channel
@kysssova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,371subscribers
+87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001922406147 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kysssova |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kysssova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 1,371 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 1,370 | +86 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 1,284 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,284 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (29 March 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,253 |
| Reactions total | 271 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,947 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5255988772763357707 | 1,947 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,947reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kysssova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 March 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Добри утра ✌️ давате интерактив скиньте своих питомцев домашних А я нарисую в пеинте потешно как мемасик одного кто мне понравится С вас like на последние посты и сторис
custom 525598877276335770753
🌟🌟🌟🌟 🗝💕🗝 🌟🌟🌟🌟 ✧.* Випки-скетчи ₊˚⊹♡🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ◛⑅·˚ ༘ ✉️✉️ 🌟🌟🤍🤍 Cmm 🪡 🦷 ⊱┊Щп ও 🤩🤩🤩 платка ✎ Рассылка @kysssova_bot
custom 525598877276335770775
🪽отите получить бесплатный артик от меня с возможностью первым увидеть полную версию арта выше? 🎀 ﹏﹏─ ִ ⃟♡ Зин – это некоммерческий печатный сборник фанатских иллюстраций, объединенных общей темой.🤍🤍 🤩Я ОЧЕНЬ старалась над работой 🤩 в Mermaid Zine от Катёша и дополнительно 🤩 хочу вас поблагодарить за поддержку _ ۫ ⢻ִؑ 🤩🤩🤩 ꒰ۣᰰ ࣪.ܸ 𝆹𝅥ׄ ፝ ۫ ࣳ – – – Если вы подписаны на меня ранее (т.е. до 24 июля) и ост…
custom 525598877276335770759
🤩ень 🤩рожденя канала 𓏲ּ𝄢 𓏵‧₊˚ и маскота!!! 🐌🐌 🎁 🌟👑 ๑ ♡ ๑ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🪽Канальчику сегодня уже 3 🤩 🪽года представляете??! 🌟 🐏🐏 Тв многа букв и спасибо 🤩 🪽ПАСИБО ВАМ БОЛЬШОЕ, я очень рада, что вы со мной, омг есть люди которые подписаны и следят за мной уже БОЛЬШЕ ГОДА и я нереально благодарна вам (и всем новеньким тоже!)🩷.. Я всегда хотева чтобы моё творчество заметили,, Я неплохо выросла в…
custom 525598877276335770784
😈😯👋🫁 🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 🦖 🤩🤩🤩 🤩 ꒷ ꒦︶ 🧩 🤩🤩🤩 - 🌟 ๋𓂃 ⋆ᡣ𐭩 ✨ 🤩🤩🤩𐙚 𓏲⋆ ִֶָ 🌟🌟 ❤️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎀 🥹#TheSparkleZine_wip \ #TheSparkleZine
custom 5255988772763357707114
🪽 🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩🤩🤩 🤩 😈😈 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ₁₅.₀₆ 🤩🤩🤩🤩Алися бртхн!!1!1🤩🤩🤩🤩 *ੈ✩‧₊˚⋆ Предстафте, что жоска фанатеете по худу с 2021 года, а патом вы смотрите сериальчеке по дису и кекаете в одном чате с села-дала... Алися я тебя люблю и Сенда тоже, пушто думаю без него ничего бы не было, поэтому наскетчила наших пупсов вместе. Гайсы я вас люблю так блин 🤩 ... А ещё я ненавижу рисовать ч*би. 🤩🤩 🎀 •°. ࿐* .°• 🌩🌩🌩🌩
custom 5255988772763357707130
🤩🤩🐏 ˚₊‧ ˎˊ˗ 🤩🤩🎀⍣ ೋ 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟 🐌 𓏼 🤩 𝄞 ۫۫ ་ ࣳ ˚ ؕ 𝜗 𓍢ִ໋ 🐏🐏 🤩 🪽ля шапки на ЮТУП ❗️ ･₊˚♡ ⋆˚｡⋆୨୧˚ 🐌🐌🐌🐌🐌🐌🤍🐌 🐏 Price : 2200₽ 🐏〰️〰️ 🤩🤩 ▫️ой первый заказик такой! Как я жаловалась в платке (там кстати спидпеинт есть), то мне тяжеловато рисовать на холстах, ограниченных по размеру в пикселях, но получилось нормально вроде, а главное заказчица довольна (｡•̀ᴗ-)! И спасибо за реакты нянян. Я ДАЖЕ В ДЕДЛАЙН
custom 5255988772763357707146
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤍🤍 🪦⊹⋆. ˚₊‧🥹🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🪽🤩🤩 ︶꒷꒦︶ ͝ ︶ ✉️✉️ ✨ .💠💠💠.💠 🪽GEN✨ 🤩🤩🤩 🌟🥹 🌟🌟🌟🌟 👨🏭 Price : $10 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Мне воопще чета не нравится ну ладна пусть будет вот я всяких интересных персов пробую рисовать воот да
custom 5255988772763357707156
🤤 💕💕💕💕 ❗️𓏼 ᪲ 𝄞۫۫ ་༘ ࣳ ˚ ؕ𝜗𓍢ִ໋ 🗝🪽ля Иваввы 🤩🤩 🗝་༘ ࣳ ᛝ ︩︪ׄ ִ𝆭ׄ ִ۫◍⃘˳ ִ ۫🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩🗝🗝 🔤 хотела ещё давно нарисовать гифт, а тут и ДРШКА завтра, и идея с анимировани глазками пришла...✨ Простите, что это ТАК плохо, это мой первый раз 🥹(( 🌟🌟 ･₊˚♡ ⋆୨୧˚ • • • • • • • • 🐱❤️🐱 • • • • • • • • 🤍 Арт будет в комметариях! 🫠
custom 5255988772763357707155
🌟🌟🖥️🤩🤩🤩⅏ 🌟🌟🌟🌟 ✨෴✨🗝 🔤а ивент ⋆.ೃ࿔*:･ 🌫🌫꒱₊* ➿➿➿➿ для Плеврит³⁷🤍🤍 🌟 🌟 *･῾ ᵎ⌇ ⁺◦ 〰️ 🌄🌄🌄 🌫 🗝🗝 Буду рада активу!! ✎⋆ . 🎁 ↳ Получить такой арт ❔
custom 5255988772763357707168
Отпишитесь, если вам не интересно мое творчество пожалуйста, просмотры есть, реактов нету , так ищьо и 6 часов прошло..., немношко снижает мотивацию 🤩 Если будете хорошенькие, то проведу интересный ивент 🤩
custom 5255988772763357707126
🤩🤩🤩🤩 за ивент🤩🤩🤩 🍫 💭 🤍🤍 🌄🌄🌄🌄 🌟🌟🌟 🤍ля Кьёны!!! Моя постояшка 🦷 🤍не тока девочка посередине нравится🦷 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ✨Буду рада активчику! 📎 ☆ Заказать артек Щитпост каналь
custom 5255988772763357707166
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kysssova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 10,897 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 118 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kysssova named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KY$OVA ౨ৎ ೃ⊹ ࣪ ˖ 🐌” (@kysssova), 1,371 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kysssova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.