Channel
@kyjj680
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
40subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002739926203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kyjj680 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kyjj680 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 40 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 39 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 40 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 42 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 43 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 43 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
#雙北客評 資料：敏捷 162.47.C.26歲 服務：全程無套進攻 價位：7000（包含無套） #客評：👇👇👇 一進門就被妹妹的笑容感染，她的親切感讓人完全放鬆下來。雖然我平常不擅社交，但她總能巧妙地引導話題，讓對話自然流暢，完全不會感到尷尬。整場互動充滿驚喜，不像一般的制式流程，而是量身打造的專屬體驗。無論是細心周到的服務還是貼心的關懷，都讓人感受到滿滿的誠意。絕對會推薦給朋友，下次一定再來！ 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://t.me/kyjj680 心靈日記分享：https://t.me/love6280 TelegramのID：@a851230 GleezyのID：line693856 個人專屬の賴：693856 或 sexy8278 選妃官網：https://www.yyy517.com/
#台中客評 #隱藏妹妹：小汁 162.45.C.22歲 #客評：👇👇👇 從一開始見到她就覺得眼前一亮，長相甜美、氣質清新，完全符合我的理想型。 洗澡的時候我們還能輕鬆地聊天，完全沒有尷尬的氣氛，感覺就像認識已久的朋友一樣。 她的身材真的沒話說，完美到讓人忍不住想多抱一會兒，而且完全沒有煙味，整個人乾淨又舒服。 在整個過程中，她的服務非常熱情，每一刻都能感受到她的投入和真誠，完全不是那種敷衍了事的感覺。更讓我意外的是，她竟然是「易濕」體質，明顯能感覺到她也在享受這個過程，這種互相的共鳴真的讓人難忘。做完之後，她也沒有急著結束，反而耐心地陪我聊天，有說有笑的，完全沒有時間壓力。 總體來說，這次經驗簡直完美！她是我喝茶多年來遇到過最讚的妹妹，完全值得加入「口袋名單」。隱藏妹妹的魅力果然名不虛傳，只有親自約過才能明白其中的精彩。下次一定還會再約，絕對是值得推薦的頂級選擇！ 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://…
#雙北客評 希希 162.47.D.26歲 #客評：👇👇👇 當我打開門的那一刻，眼前出現了一位擁有迷人身材的年輕妹妹，她那豐滿的上圍令人印象深刻。在彼此的吸引下，我們決定一同沐浴，而我也注意到了她似乎對體毛進行了精心的修飾。 然而當我們進人浴室時，這可是我第一次遇見如此光滑無比的女生！光滑無比的肌膚讓我心跳加速，至今回想起來仍感到激動不已。 洗淨身軀後，我們的慾望逐漸升溫，最終在床上展開了熱烈的愛撫。她用柔軟的舌頭和嘴唇探索著我的身體，讓我渴望進一步的親密接觸。在充滿激情的抽插後，我讓她騎在我身上，直到雙方都達到高潮，徹底滿足。整段經歷非常美妙，不僅因為肢體上的愉悅，還因為我們之間輕鬆愉快的對話。這樣的體驗絕對值得每一分錢，感謝這位迷人的伴侶帶給我難忘的一夜。 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://t.me/kyjj680 心靈日記分享：https://t.me/love6280 TelegramのID…
#雙北客評 資料：小足 162.45.C.21歲 #客評：👇👇👇 這位真的超棒的妹妹！身材火辣，最重要的是她的服務態度超級熱情。妹妹那溫柔的聲音和親切的笑容馬上讓我放鬆下來，完全沒有很尷尬。 上床後，她主動開始營造氣氛，先是用她靈巧的手指幫我按摩背部，再慢慢地靠近我，輕輕擁抱、深情對視，甚至還給了我一個意外的舌吻，讓我瞬間心跳加速！她的皮膚滑嫩細膩，每一次接觸都讓人忍不住想更多。 當我們進入正題時，她那緊致的身體讓我驚喜萬分，每一下都仿佛在挑戰我的極限，但同時又帶有一種難以言喻的舒適感。她還很會掌握節奏，時而緩慢、時而激烈，讓人完全沉浸在她精湛的技巧中。中途休息時，她還會黏在我身邊，用手指輕撫我的胸口，或者調皮地玩弄我的『小兄弟』，根本停不下來啊！ 最讓我滿意的是，姊真的就像個百寶袋，不管你有什麼特殊喜好，他們都能找到符合你期待的妹妹。這次無套初體驗不僅安全、衛生，更讓我享受到前所未有的刺激與滿足。如果你也在尋找高品…
#雙北客評 資訊： 小真 160.50.D.30歲 價位：6000 #客評：👇👇👇 一開始見到妹妹就很熱情服務，每一步都讓人陶醉。洗澡時她輕柔地照顧著我，讓我感到無比放鬆；按摩時她巧妙地運用手法，讓我的肌肉得到徹底的釋放。最讓我難忘的，莫過於她那無套吹的絕活，技巧高超，讓我差點忍不住！她主動圈住我的腰，讓我更加投入，尤其是後入時的撞擊感，簡直是享受至極！她的肉感身材和迷人的叫聲，完全滿足了我的幻想。這一次的體驗，讓我感受到前所未有的快感，我不是因為高潮而離開，而是被她的魅力所征服！下次一定會再來找她，絕對不會後悔！ 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://t.me/kyjj680 心靈日記分享：https://t.me/love6280 TelegramのID：@a851230 GleezyのID：line693856 個人專屬の賴：693856 或 sexy8278 選妃官網：https://www.y…
#雙北客評 身材資訊：雪花 160.45.C.22歲 #客評：👇👇👇 今天約會的女孩真是讓人驚喜連連！一見面就被她甜美的笑容給迷住了。她的穿著簡單又不失時尚，整個人散發著一種清新自然的魅力。聊起天來，她健談又風趣，話題源源不絕，完全沒有冷場的時候。 回到床上後，她的主動和熱情更是超出預期。從輕柔的擁抱到充滿創意的親密互動，每一刻都讓人沉浸其中，無法自拔。尤其是她那羞澀中帶點大膽的眼神，簡直是致命誘惑。最後在滿滿的滿足感和愉悅中結束了這次難忘的約會。下次絕對還要約她，因為這樣的體驗實在太完美了！ 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://t.me/kyjj680 心靈日記分享：https://t.me/love6280 TelegramのID：@a851230 GleezyのID：line693856 個人專屬の賴：693856 或 sexy8278 選妃官網：https://www.yyy517.com/
#雙北客評 言言 162.47.D.25歲 #客評：👇👇👇 一見面，她便以甜美的笑容和熱情的擁抱迎接我，讓我瞬間感覺到放鬆和溫暖。 她的服務態度極佳，從一開始就讓人覺得賓至如歸。 在洗澡過程中，她不僅仔細地為我按摩，還不時地調侃我，讓氣氛輕鬆愉快。 她的技術真是了得，每一次觸碰都讓我感到舒適和興奮。尤其是在她巧妙的挑逗下，我的慾望被徹底喚醒，期待著接下來的親密時刻。 到了床上，我迫不及待地想要探索她的身體，而她也熱情地回應著我的每一次觸碰。 她的皮膚滑嫩，身材火辣，讓我沉浸在無盡的快感中。當我親吻和愛撫她時，她柔軟的呻吟聲更讓我欲罷不能。 然而最讓我印象深刻的還是她的口交技巧。她靈活的舌頭和嘴唇帶給我前所未有的快感，讓我在短時間內就達到了高潮。我不得不請求她停下來，否則我會立刻崩潰！ 在最終的環節中，她主動地騎在我身上，將我緊緊包裹在她體內。她的動作熟練而充滿誘惑，讓我在短暫的時刻裡體驗到了極致的快樂。 在她的引導下…
#雙北客評 身材資料：160.45.D.20歲 #客評：👇👇👇 從一開始看到妹妹不僅長相甜美，而且十分專業，讓人感覺非常舒適和放心。 我特別喜歡她們的貼心服務，總能滿足我的各種需求，甚至一些我沒想到的細節也考慮到了。 最令人難忘的是妹妹竟然把她的『親親』獻給了我，這份驚喜讓我感動不已！ 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://t.me/kyjj680 心靈日記分享：https://t.me/love6280 TelegramのID：@a851230 GleezyのID：line693856 個人專屬の賴：693856 或 sexy8278 選妃官網：https://www.yyy517.com/
#高雄客評 蕊蕊 162.47.C.26歲 #客評：👇👇👇 一進房間，就被妹妹的甜美笑容融化，氣氛超放鬆，一點壓力都沒有。她的皮膚滑嫩如絲，撫摸起來很舒服，聊天超有共鳴，也有趣，話題源源不絕，完全忘記時間的存在。她主動出擊，技巧高超，每一刻都充滿驚喜，讓人陶醉其中。唯一小遺憾是口技還需磨練，但整體來說已經很出色了！下次一定要再約 一鍵快速預覽全部頻道 小姐真實點評：https://t.me/kyjj680 心靈日記分享：https://t.me/love6280 TelegramのID：@a851230 GleezyのID：line693856 個人專屬の賴：693856 或 sexy8278 選妃官網：https://www.yyy517.com/
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kyjj680. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kyjj680 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“乖乖客評分享” (@kyjj680), 40 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kyjj680.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.