🎰 龙岗区布吉开心果半价(环保) 📮 参与条件: 🌏️ 归属地 广东 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-深圳高牌红中抽奖福利 🎫 加入-深圳龙岗布吉专业环保 开心果 🎫 加入-深圳高牌红中交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 14 条 🎫 加入-深圳高牌红中约炮榜 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 半价 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: ❶ 刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、删除消息、撤回内容等行为,均视为无效发言,直接取消中奖资格。请大家用心、真诚交流! ❷ 中奖后请24小时内联系老师,并在3天内完成报告向 @ice1000 提交。因炸号、退群、注销账号等个人原因导致超时未兑换的,不予兑奖。 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月16日 00时58分00秒

Channel
深圳龙岗布吉专业环保 开心果
@kxg99999
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,282subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003918648809 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kxg99999 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kxg99999 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 1,282 | +21 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 1,261 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,261 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.75%
- avg views ÷ 1,282 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 125
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,250 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 41s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
修车不用到处跑 野寻维修没烦恼 人傻钱多 就喜欢撒钱 进群有抽奖 有红包⬇️ https://t.me/chasesz_jlq
📊 0条车评,综合评分 好评 0% |人照 |服务 中评 0% |颜值 |态度 差评 0% |身材 |环境 【常驻群】深圳兰苑 榜单 报告群 报告,好评 💃🏻【芳名】#开心果 布吉 🏠【位置】#龙岗 💵【课费】#400p ✈️【联系】 @kxg336699 🤖【备用联系】 @kxg336699_bot 🎉【频道】 https://t.me/kxg99999 💯【标签】#激情69 #毒龙 #舌吻 #花式调情 备注:#已视频验证 去过麻烦提交报告,要定金就别去并 反馈管理 ✏️ 报告模版 ✉️提交报告 ✍️出击报告,因字符有限,报告可在下方评论区可全部查看:👇👇
有空,在岗,可约 #龙岗 #布吉
有空,在岗,可约。
开课了,有需要的哥哥提前约时间哦
【深圳万人选妃电报小程序】 ✅狼友避雷请到万人选妃✅ 深圳选妃电报小程序是 低端. 中端. 高端. 洋酒. 综合平台可满足所有狼友的需求… 平台老师👉必须拍验证视频上榜 👇深圳万人选妃修车群 ✅ https://t.me/wanrensz 👇深圳选妃电报小程序✅ http://t.me/SZXFBOT/abcd 免费上榜 @szwr99 双向机器 @wanrgbot
https://telegram.me/sz_xicha
Video, posted without a caption
🔰点击加入⚡深圳皮卡丘 老师艺名:开心果(95) 开课地区:#布吉 上课费用:400 500 🔰联系方式:@kxg336699 🤖双向联系:@kxg336699_bot 🔊 提交报告 | 报告合集 | 👨🏻💻唯一管理
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kxg99999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 594,674 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@byfel · 20,4761 post野寻 · 深圳学生交流群
@chasesz_jlq · 22,4801 post红中反馈报告档案
@hzhgbgda · 1,0441 post深圳【皮卡丘】报告榜
@PKQBG · 11,3811 post深圳·喜茶
@sz_xicha · 32,8231 post深圳高牌红中抽奖福利
@szgph · 1,2241 post深圳兰苑
@szll19 · 36,0531 post深圳兰苑老师榜
@szll29 · 43,1881 post深圳兰苑(报告)
@szll39 · 10,5581 post深圳【皮卡丘】闲聊群🅥
@SZPKQ · 21,2021 post深圳万人修车广场【群】
@wanrensz · 29,9551 post深圳高牌红中约炮榜
@xog888 · 8,5441 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳龙岗布吉专业环保 开心果” (@kxg99999), 1,282 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kxg99999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.