Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kwarwie

@kwarwie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,627subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001621494305
TypeChannel
Username@kwarwie
Created12 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kwarwie

Growth

1,6271,6301,628.57 August 2026 — 1,630 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,630 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,629 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,627–1,630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:581,627-2
10 Aug 2026, 10:031,629-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:101,630no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:011,630first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.4%
avg views ÷ 1,627 subscribers
Avg views / post
885
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (19 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,622
Reactions total1,545
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,545 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
76749.6%
🔥19612.7%
🥰19212.4%
❤‍🔥17611.4%
🍓1046.73%
💘392.52%
💋312.01%
🍌110.712%
👾90.583%
🙏60.388%
👀40.259%
👍30.194%
🕊30.194%
👻20.129%
10.065%
🌭10.065%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,545reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kwarwie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC343 views138 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Швидкий скетчик #art@kwarwie

84🔥25❤‍🔥15🥰7👍2💘2🍌1👾1

3 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,640 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨ Моя перша VTuber моделька вже доступна для покупки!! ✨ Для тих, хто ще не знайомий з VTuber культурою: VTuber модель - це 2D аватар, який повторює рухи та міміку вашого обличчя за допомогою камери. Це чудова альтернатива для тих, хто хоче створювати контент або стрімити, але при цьому залишатися приватним в інтернеті. Модель включає: - Fullbody Live2D rig (XYZ tracking) - Підтримку VBridger для покращеного face t

❤‍🔥4316🥰7💘3

2 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC589 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Атаки на Чучу: 1. https://share.google/wiJPJu19dj4Wwa7Bt 2. https://share.google/Ae8qjAgho9nYEK5KQ

🔥30🥰1514❤‍🔥4🍓1

2 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC562 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Артфайт закінчився, тож я хочу поділитися неймовірними атаками Дуже шкода, що не було часу на ревенджі 😔 Атаки на Райто: 1. https://x.com/Scyfosu 2. https://t.me/googy_dug 3. https://x.com/patofry_ 4. https://t.me/darknish_marine

❤‍🔥4218🥰9🔥2🌭1

30 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC693 views135 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скетчик Райто #art@kwarwie #oc@kwarwie

95🔥18🍌10🍓5❤‍🔥31👍1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC757 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @V_EI8HTPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

36❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC792 views181 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Завершила дизайн для вітубера!! Буду дуже вдячна підтримці постиків: в тві в інсті #art@kwarwie

🥰10344❤‍🔥21🍓6💘4👻1💋1🙏1

25 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC≈1,410 views181 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мама возиться з шоукейсом

120💋23💘22❤‍🔥7👾3🍓2🔥1🕊1

25 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC909 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Спідпейнт #art@kwarwie

71🥰20🍓14❤‍🔥7🕊1

22 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC938 views213 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Закінчений артик Для бажаючих підтримати постики: в інсті в твітері #art@kwarwie

🔥12046🍓25❤‍🔥10💘4👾3💋3👻1

20 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC949 views183 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

+ колір #art@kwarwie

115🥰29🍓25❤‍🔥5👀4💘3💋2

19 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,040 views159 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нова віпка ✿ ✿ ✿ Для бажаючих підтримати постики: в інсті в твітері #art@kwarwie

108🍓26❤‍🔥18🙏3👾2💋1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kwarwie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 99,990 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kwarwie” (@kwarwie), 1,627 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kwarwie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.