Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kvitsov

Channel

Kvitsov

@kvitsov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,038subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001433441969
TypeChannel
Username@kvitsov
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kvitsov

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0241,0451,034.524 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,040 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,042 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,045 subscribers24 September 2026 — 1,043 subscribers4 October 2026 — 1,040 subscribers11 October 2026 — 1,038 subscribers1,03824 August 202611 October 2026
11 measurements spanning 48 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,021–1,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 06:201,038-2
4 Oct 2026, 15:361,040-3
24 Sept 2026, 21:381,043-2
16 Sept 2026, 10:011,045+3
8 Sept 2026, 16:171,042+2
3 Sept 2026, 14:011,040+4
31 Aug 2026, 05:391,036+1
27 Aug 2026, 21:351,035+5
25 Aug 2026, 03:271,030+6
24 Aug 2026, 05:151,024no change
24 Aug 2026, 05:001,024first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,872 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤83144.4%
💘20410.9%
🍓20110.7%
🔥1829.72%
❤‍🔥1186.30%
😱1085.77%
🥰794.22%
🏆653.47%
💋321.71%
😭231.23%
👏120.641%
⚡50.267%
👎50.267%
🍌20.107%
🐳20.107%
👀10.053%
👍10.053%
😁10.053%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,872 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 17 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kvitsov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC592 views96 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Я тут развлекался недавно и сделал кисти для КСП из мс пэинта,это было не оч весело делать,но рисовать ими весело.типо там и скринтоны с чб мода 😋😋. Но к сожалению они за деньги,кисти не первая необходимость помните,я просто в надежде что кто-то будет спонсировать мою финансовую безграмотность. ссылка

🍓55❤21❤‍🔥10🏆7🐳2🥰1

21 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTC643 views98 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Никаких 10 Мистерио 😡😡😡 я хочу кое-что обсудить меня это очень тяготит,есть фанфик по спайдипулам мне там нравится все иногда я часами думаю о сцене где дп зашивает паучка,но концовка этого фанфика меня убивает каждый раз,и я как бы понимаю что это может случится в реальности,но я так не люблю нижнего уэйда 🫩🫩🫩 я прочту этот фанфик все равно в десятый раз ток найти его еще надо…

🍓56❤21🔥10🏆8❤‍🔥2💘1

17 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC969 views142 reactions1 Starread 24 August 2026
Photo

Моя часть трейда для фунчозная база 😋😋

🔥79❤34🥰23⚡2🍓1🏆1👀1💘1

17 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC735 views49 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @kot_ickPhoto

Моя часть трейда для @kvitsov

❤34🔥13💘2

29 Jul 2026, 23:58 UTC≈1,050 views82 reactionsread 24 August 2026

В новом человеке пауке будет трек деспасито

❤55💘15🔥6👎5👍1

25 Jul 2026, 00:39 UTC≈1,050 views144 reactions1 Starread 24 August 2026
Photo

Решил что пока меня не разъебет дроном буду играть в ромпу,это мой первый раз бзв,вообще все хуево максимально ;( осваиваю новый планшет сасунг ебать эпле людей наебывает (все рисунки тут с него пока трудно)

❤90😭23🔥20❤‍🔥6🏆3🍓1💘1

26 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,230 views137 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Трейд :3

❤81❤‍🔥31🍓19🏆4💘2

26 Jun 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,000 views38 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @kto_prochel_tot_loxxPhoto

Моя часть трейда для @kvitsov #картиночка

❤22❤‍🔥16

18 Jun 2026, 23:36 UTC≈1,130 views143 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Ээээыэыыэыы

❤99🔥18👏12❤‍🔥9🥰3🏆2

1 Jun 2026, 18:41 UTC≈1,150 views57 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @arrboredddPhoto

Трейдик с @kvitsov ☺️ Сыночка-корзиночка Очень не часто рисую трейды, было приятно вспомнить какого это 🌅 #трейд

🍓30❤‍🔥14❤13

28 May 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,240 views134 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Моя часть трейда СПАСИБО БЛИН ОЧ РАД ПОЛУЧАТЬ РИСУНКИ И РИСОВАТЬ ИХ АРИАИОВОТВОВТВТ

💘74❤37🔥15🏆8

28 May 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,020 views52 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gerass4Photo

Моя картинка на трейд с невероятным kvitsov! Была безумно счастлива порисовать для него😋😋

💘27🥰15❤10

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kvitsov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kvitsov” (@kvitsov), 1,038 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kvitsov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.