Channel
@kvadratna_tochka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002474134326 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kvadratna_tochka |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kvadratna_tochka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 1 | -32 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 33 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 33 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
225 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 12.9% | |
| 💊 | 29 | 12.9% | |
| 💋 | 23 | 10.2% | |
| 🍓 | 21 | 9.33% | |
| custom 5190864759179738385 | 16 | 7.11% | |
| custom 5330106095677497986 | 16 | 7.11% | |
| custom 5402251423012383299 | 8 | 3.56% | |
| custom 5328313634026188463 | 7 | 3.11% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 3.11% | |
| custom 5359379175427829620 | 6 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5402177781503127377 | 6 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5330130890523696680 | 5 | 2.22% | |
| custom 5402324759578961785 | 5 | 2.22% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.889% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 21 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ляя, какова красота. Я как раз вчера дочитала "Твоё сердце будет разбито" и прочитала 134 страницы "по осколкам твоего сердца". Эта диалогия у меня тоже как и ведьма стала любимой. Но в тизере я уже заметила небольшой момент, который немного не соответствует книге (знаю что часто книги и фильмы отличаются). Вообще, я самого начала мне было кринжово от этой дилогии... Ну не моё это, а потом чё то как то всё таки понра…
💋2❤🔥1🍓1💊1
Реклама в кинотеатрах для многих становится интереснее фильмов 🤭🤭 Читательница засняла тизер к экранизации книги «Твое сердце будет разбито», который сейчас крутят в кинотеатрах! 🫧 Напоминаем, что актуальная дата премьеры ― 26 марта.
💋2❤🔥1🍓1💊1
File, posted without a caption
❤🔥2🍓2💋2💊1
Мы думаем, что наши судьбы меняют глобальные события. Но зачастую это не так. Ссоры, недомолвки, обиды, ложь, страх - вот что меняет жизнь раз за разом, мгновение за мгновением. Дарья Сергеева
💔7❤🔥5🍓3💋2💊1
Не плохой конец и начало года
❤🔥3🍓3❤2💋2💊1
Окак https://followish.io/mywishlist/jxygbrkrzcrqje
❤7❤🔥5💊3🍓2
Подростки часто ничего не боятся и мир видят иначе, чем взрослые. Темнота - не опасность, а романтика. Тишина - не предвестник беды, а спокойствие. И два часа ночи - отличное время, чтобы болтать и наслаждаться ароматом ночи и звёзд. Дарья Сергеева
❤8❤🔥7💋6💊4🍓2
Что ж, я прочитала диалогию "ЛюбовьНенависть" и "НенавистьЛюбовь". Хочу сказать, что это пожалуй единственные книги которые вызвали во мне столько эмоций.. В особенности негативные. На последней прогулки, я говорила что книга пока что на 9/10 и ведьма мне нравится намного больше, но после прочтения, моё мнение поменялось. Мне безумно понравилась эта диалогия, хотя и достаточно часто бесило то, что у Даши и Дани вечны…
❤9❤🔥8💊5💋5
Я думал, прощание - это всегда конец, а теперь знаю: зарождение - это тоже прощание. Это тоже значить уходить. И конца тут быть не может Эрнст
💊8🍓7❤🔥6❤3💋2
Да там всё на столько запутано, что только в конце понятно что есть что, кто есть кто. В любвиненависти тоже иногда так бывает.. НО НЕ ТАК КАК В ПОКЛОННИКЕ
❤🔥5custom 53283136340261884633custom 53301060956774979863custom 53301308905236966803custom 54022514230123832993custom 54023247595789617853💊2💯2
Слишком часто от нас что-то ускользало, от кого-то и не малость - жизнь... Эрнст
custom 51908647591797383854custom 53283136340261884634custom 54021777815031273774custom 53301060956774979863❤🔥2💊2custom 53301308905236966802custom 53593791754278296202
Я начала читать #ЛюбовьНенависть)
custom 519086475917973838510custom 533010609567749798610custom 54022514230123832993custom 53593791754278296202
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kvadratna_tochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“魏延” (@kvadratna_tochka), 1 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kvadratna_tochka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.