Channel
@kuzminc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,785subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001729464194 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kuzminc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kuzminc |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 3,785 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 3,784 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 3,786 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 3,787 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:13 | 3,790 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 3,791 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 3,794 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 3,797 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 3,798 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 3,797 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 3,798 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 3,799 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 3,800 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 3,800 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjceN8ew | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Москва поддержит проведение второго Московского стартап-саммита. Мэр сказал, что он пройдет 29–30 сентября в «СберСити» и соберет предпринимателей, инвесторов и представителей крупных компаний со всей страны. В программе — презентации стартапов, встречи с инвесторами, выставка технологических проектов и финал «Техлаб Москва». #мг
Что с погодой в Кузьминках? Одевайтесь по погоде, берегите себя! Мегапродуктивного дня, соседи! #погоданарайоне
Если у вас есть творческие идеи, которым не хватает реализации, — это шанс. В Москве принимают заявки на конкурс «Контуры культуры», где художникам предлагают придумать эскизы о цифровом мире, ставшем частью повседневной жизни. 10 лучших работ украсят интерьеры масштабных городских площадок. Подать заявку можно до 16 августа. Подробности на сайте газеты «Мой район»: mr.moscow/natalya-sergunina-v-moskve-otkrylsya-p…
Универмаг Будапешт. Волгоградский проспект #СтарыйПарк
👍1
😡 Соседка пишет, что на Маршала Чуйкова, 7/4, у подъезда поставили лавочку, которая стала точкой притяжения для шумных компаний с алкоголем и мусором — рядом «Пятёрочка», и теперь вечерние посиделки переходят в ночные. Жители просят разобраться и перенести лавочку. Подайте заявку через «Наш город» в категориях «Предложения по благоустройству» и «Нарушение общественного порядка», а также напишите в управу района Кузь…
Признавайтесь, вы тоже с умным видом хлопаете по арбузу, как по барабану, пытаясь на слух определить его свежесть? А если серьезно, на что вы смотрите в первую очередь, чтобы не купить "ватный" арбуз?
🌳 Вчера в Кузьминках проверили благоустройство дворов на Волгоградском проспекте, Жигулёвской и Волжском бульваре. Представители управы осмотрели детские площадки, резиновое покрытие, качели, скамейки и обсудили планы с жителями. Замечаете, как преображаются дворы? 🏙 Подписывайся на М125 | Прислать новость | ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА МАКС
На форуме «Территория смыслов» мэр рассказал, что многие проекты Москвы, включая транспорт, медицину, образование, благоустройство, становятся основой для новых решений, которые затем внедряют в других регионах. О них по порядку на карточках. #мг
🏗 Сергей Собянин открыл ситуационный центр Стройкомплекса Москвы. Там будут мониторить около 1,7 тысячи объектов и управлять чрезвычайными ситуациями. Это должно снизить риски аварий на стройплощадках в Кузьминках и повысить прозрачность градостроительного комплекса. Лайк, если считаете это полезной инициативой. 🏙 Подписывайся на М125 | Прислать новость | ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА МАКС
Президент дал добро на эксперимент по контролю за миграцией в Москве, рассказал Собянин. На границе у всех приезжих собирают биометрию, чтобы быстро идентифицировать человека и не пропускать нарушителей в страну. В Москве уже работает приложение «Амина», с помощью которого можно отследить, где проживают и работают мигранты. Кроме того, при оформлении патента собирают геномные данные — это помогает раскрывать преступ…
👍1
🌿 На наших прудах уже несколько лет живут камышницы. Каждый сезон прилетают и выводят птенцов на Верхнем пруду. На Щучьем тоже видели, но после зачистки рогоза укрыться им негде. Не обижайте их. 🏙 Подписывайся на М125 | Прислать новость | ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА МАКС
Навести красоту в доме к весне без лишних усилий могут помочь сервисы мос.ру. Как заказать вывоз ненужного хлама и химчистку любимого ковра — рассказываем на карточках. #мг
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @kuzminc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В какой город России вы бы хотели слетать?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
@kuzminc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кузьминки район М125” (@kuzminc), 3,785 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuzminc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.