Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кутузова_юрист

Channel

Кутузова_юрист

@kutuzova_jurist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153510164
TypeChannel
Username@kutuzova_jurist
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 October 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kutuzova_jurist

Growth

116123119.56 August 2026 — 116 subscribers14 August 2026 — 117 subscribers23 August 2026 — 118 subscribers29 August 2026 — 119 subscribers1 October 2026 — 120 subscribers9 October 2026 — 120 subscribers10 October 2026 — 123 subscribers6 August 202610 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 65 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 09:56123+3
9 Oct 2026, 21:22120no change
1 Oct 2026, 04:58120+1
29 Aug 2026, 12:17119+1
23 Aug 2026, 02:04118+1
14 Aug 2026, 14:06117+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:47116first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.7%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.3
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held19 (15 July 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total940
Reactions total87
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 30s
Average length
2m 15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2627.7%
🔥2324.5%
👍1819.1%
👏88.51%
🙏66.38%
🤣66.38%
🙈22.13%
🤝22.13%
✍11.06%
🎉11.06%
🤬11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 07:27 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026

Вот тут писала про ГСК и ДГИ, вуаля, ДГИ снова подали жалобу в ксссацию!!! Дело с 2021 года, на минуточку, и как и почему им восстанавливают сроки и принимают жалобы, вопрос открытый 😓

🤬1

7 Oct 2026, 14:14 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 9 October 2026

https://youtu.be/W647aUGcJTE?si=CKYyY9L5nhCkBtnY Интереснейшее интервью Сергея Анатольевича Пашина — российский судья в отставке, кандидат юридических наук, заслуженный юрист Российской Федерации.

👍2

7 Oct 2026, 11:50 UTC45 views10 reactionsread 9 October 2026

Вчера в Щербинском утвердили мировое соглашение по делу, начавшемуся почти год назад. Спор вытекал из вреда, причинного арендованной квартире в связи с несогласованным проживанием в ней собаки бойцовской породы, и не только. Квартира хорошая, новая, с прекрасным ремонтом и антикварной мебелью. Вот все это и пострадало, в результате чего мой доверитель производил замену мебели, ремонт, химчистку и обработку от зап…

❤3👍3🙏2✍1👏1

24 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Вечерний юмор)) на злобу дня)) Я бы уточнила так: скажи мне кто твои контрагенты и я скажу на сколько ты сядешь! А все это сомнительные схемы с составе группы компаний, платежи без экономической целесообразности, ситуативная налоговая выгода…и далеко идущие неблагоприятные последствия… P.s: и плохо, если ты в этой схеме конечный исполнитель физик

👍1

24 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC106 views4 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Не единожды судилась с ДГИ, когда они оспаривали завещание, оспаривали переход права, пытались признать имущество выморочном, спорили с законностью возведения гаражей, пытались забрать частный дом на территории Москвы… ❗️и везде без достаточных на то оснований… Вот и в понедельник спор с ДГИ по коммерческому объекту, а вчера, очередное отложение по оспариванию прав законного наследника и самого завещания…

❤2🤝2

22 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC100 views11 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Сегодня встреча с клиентами и Арбитраж Москвы. Боремся второй год с ДГИ и доказываем отсутствие оснований для снова и демонтажа части коммерческого объекта на Мясницкой… Была экспертиза, дополнительная экспертиза, самостоятельная частичная реконструкция собственником в целях исключения всех оснований для претензий… Сегодня решался вопрос о предоставлении еще дополнительных документов по запросу экспертной организ…

❤5🔥4👍1🙏1

21 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC103 views10 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Была в конце прошлой недели на приеме у зам. руководителя Управления Росреестра по Москве, записывалась за 1,5 месяца. Вкратце, была приостановка по регистрации права собственности, дело сложное, и получив решение суда о признании права, казалось, что мы на финишной прямой. Но нет, не зарегистрировали и вынесли бессрочную приостановку, несмотря на не оспоренный, вступивший в законную силу судебный акт! ➕Из плюсов…

👍3🔥3🙈2❤1👏1

21 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC85 views5 reactionsread 9 October 2026

Кстати, помимо кейсов, где я выявляю риски и проверяю или дорабатываю договора с ИП и СЗМ в интересах заказчика - юр. лица, есть реальные кейсы, где физик ведет себя не добросовестно и пытается переквалифицировать гпх в трудовой договор (в том числе через суд), с одновременным разумеется уведомлением и налоговой и трудовой инспекции))

👍4👏1

21 Sept 2026, 10:26 UTC90 views12 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Всех с началом новой рабочей недели! У меня снова одни задачки со «звездочками» для разрешения! 📋Выскажусь тут по работе с физическими лицами в статусе ИП и самозанятыми. ✅Безусловно, как и раньше, поверяющие органы пристально отслеживают данные сделки, где исполнителем выступает физическое лицо! ✅Однако, сейчас, помимо кейсов с налоговыми органами, мы все видим и кейсы уже от правоохранительных органов и регуляр…

❤5👍4🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kutuzova_jurist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кутузова_юрист” (@kutuzova_jurist), 123 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kutuzova_jurist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.