Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for crypto Kuti gems πŸ’Ž

Channel

crypto Kuti gems πŸ’Ž

@kuti_gems

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

4,923subscribers

-1,406 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002496885012
TypeChannel
Username@kuti_gems
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kuti_gems

Growth

4,9236,3295,6267 August 2026 β€” 6,329 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 6,329 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 6,295 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 6,119 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 5,870 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 5,587 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 5,369 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 5,112 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 4,923 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1,406. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,712–6,540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 10:434,923-189
24 Aug 2026, 10:275,112-257
20 Aug 2026, 14:435,369-218
17 Aug 2026, 19:275,587-283
14 Aug 2026, 13:245,870-249
11 Aug 2026, 00:316,119-176
8 Aug 2026, 11:146,295-34
7 Aug 2026, 14:316,329no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:216,329first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
16.1%
avg views Γ· 4,923 subscribers
Avg views / post
791
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.324%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total15,813
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀981.8%
πŸ”₯218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTCβ‰ˆ1,420 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@kuti_owner1 , unlock VIP access and stay ahead with our exclusive premium alpha. Catch high-potential trades before the crowd.

❀1

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTCβ‰ˆ1,040 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$ICM at 3 million market cap investors ! LFG πŸš€πŸ”₯

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTCβ‰ˆ1,340 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

115x done on $ICM TP1 βœ… $20k β€” $2.3M MCAP CHART πŸ“Š JOIN VIP NOW: @kuti_owner1

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC110 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New solana meme $ICM DZchfuc2Jom3m6zovzFNTREH4Tm4zx6mAavHCDLbpump

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC160 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$STONK at 7 million dollars market cap! We are printing hard chads πŸ“ˆπŸ€‘

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

162x on $STONK Coin β€” the chart is going parabolic! πŸš€ $37k β†’ $6M market cap.

❀1

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC441 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

83x done on $STONK TP1 βœ… $37k β€” $3.1M MCAP CHART πŸ“Š JOIN VIP NOW: @kuti_owner1

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

6 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC614 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New solana meme $STONK 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

5 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC491 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

πŸ’₯ Another Monster Performance! Our VIP members captured an astonishing 811x return. From $8k to 7 million market cap currently sitting β€” momentum still building. πŸš€

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

5 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC568 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$BingBong at 2.4M MCAP chads 266x achieved πŸ”₯

πŸ”₯2

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

5 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC701 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

177x done on $BingBong $9k β€” $1.6M MCAP CHART πŸ“Š JOIN VIP NOW: @kuti_owner1

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

5 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC617 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New Robinhood meme $BingBong 0xc876d532203dCB34927e0881523F9EDA68EB5561

Signed BIG GEMS (ALWAYS VERIFY)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kuti_gems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œcrypto Kuti gems πŸ’Žβ€ (@kuti_gems), 4,923 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuti_gems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.