🔖 Lebih Sulit Daripada Meruncingkan Anak Panah Syaikh Zaid Ar-Rummani hafizhahullah mengutip sebuah ungkapan lama, اختيار الكلام أشد من نحت السهام "Memilih kata itu lebih sulit daripada meruncingkan anak panah." Dulu, anak panah hanya melukai satu orang, itu pun butuh jarak dan sasaran. Sekarang, satu ketikan bisa menyebar ke ribuan layar dalam hitungan detik, tanpa perlu jarak sama sekali. Kata yang sama bisa j…

Channel
𝐊𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐥 𝐅𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐝
@kutaibulfawaid
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,220subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001838805893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kutaibulfawaid |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kutaibulfawaid |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 7,220 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:34 | 7,228 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 7,232 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 7,236 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 7,237 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.40%
- avg views ÷ 7,220 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 390
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,069 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔖 Orang Pikir itu Kebaikan, Padahal Kelemahan Termasuk kelemahan seseorang adalah ketidakmampuannya mengatakan "tidak" bukan karena ia selalu baik, tetapi karena takut mengecewakan, takut ditolak, atau ingin diterima semua orang. Padahal tidak semua permintaan harus dipenuhi, tidak semua ajakan harus diikuti, dan tidak semua orang harus dibuat senang. Ketegasan bukan berarti kasar. Mengatakan "tidak" pada sesuatu y…
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
📖 Ada yang bilang Kitab Arba'in itu mudah, tapi berapa banyak yang benar-benar punya sanadnya? Membaca terjemahannya memang bisa kapan saja. Tapi duduk di majelis sama', mendengar langsung dari seorang syekh yang memegang sanad bersambung ke penulisnya langsung itu pengalaman yang berbeda. Rabu ini, ada kesempatan untuk akhwat mendapatkan ijazah riwayat Kitab Al-Arba'in An-Nawawiyah dibimbing langsung oleh Dr. Sof…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🔖 Ketika Waktu Kosong Tidak Pernah Benar-Benar Kosong Alhamdulillah, setelah proses panjang, artikel jurnal yang saya susun bersama Ustadz Dr. Syafiq Riza Hasan Basalamah, MA hafizhahullah (selaku pembimbing) resmi diterima di al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, dan insya Allah akan terbit dalam waktu dekat Artikel ini meneliti kajian Fiqhul Usrah di Masjid Abdillah, Rabbani Residence, dengan Ustadz Syafiq Riza …
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔖 Ucapan, Cermin Kualitas Diri Diantara faedah dari kajian Ustadz Firanda Andirja hafizhahullah, dalam seri Kaidah Kehidupan dalam Al-Qur'an #1, ketika membahas tentang perintah berkata baik. Ada satu hal menarik yang beliau soroti dari ayat ini: ﴿وَقُولُوا۟ لِلنَّاسِ حُسْنًا﴾ "Dan ucapkanlah kepada manusia kata-kata yang baik." (QS. Al-Baqarah [2]: 83) Seseorang mungkin memiliki penampilan fisik yang luar biasa, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kutaibulfawaid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fiqihwanitaofficial · 31,261
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@najmiumar · 30,349
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
@khalidbasalamahofficial · 71,246
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@muhammadnuzuldzikri · 50,461
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
@Manhaj_salaf1 · 34,431
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@shahihfiqih · 42,585
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
@muslimorid · 33,113
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐊𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐥 𝐅𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐝” (@kutaibulfawaid), 7,220 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kutaibulfawaid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.