😀😀😀😀|新加坡娱乐城☝️业界第一☝️ 🥰有量打款,预付拉满,月结/周结/日结多种结算方式,70%+额外人头分红! 🚀 招商合作😊😊 @kyqp665 😀 招商频道😊😊 @kyqpai01 🤖 双向联系😊😊 @kyqpjsgj3bot 🎮PG电子-金沙国际-麻将胡了-真人视讯--棋牌游戏-澳门新葡京-牛牛炸金花等各种热门游戏🎮 😙新加坡娱乐城官网: m7691.top ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🕹🕹🕹🕹 😀【认准用户名,直接点击咨询,频道其他广告信息切勿相信,避免造成损失!】
❤1👍1🔥1😢1

Channel
@kusoso
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
173,428subscribers
-47,390 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001947165197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @kusoso @vpnjczw |
| Description | #东南亚 #吃瓜 #猎奇 #新闻 商务合作负责人: @nicei 曝光/投稿 @kusoylbot 东南亚新闻速递|热门吃瓜第一线|猎奇事件盘点|内幕持续曝光,只做真实、敢说、有料的内容 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 125 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kusoso |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @xinribao/931934 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC | @kusoso/17051 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC | 1.00 | 71 minutes |
| @xinribao/931964 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC | @kusoso/17050 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @xinribao/898634 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC | @kusoso/13469 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 01:52 UTC | 0.94 | 10 hours |
| @xinribao/8958131 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC | @kusoso/13123 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC | 0.93 | 6.2 hours |
| @xinribao/8953630 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC | @kusoso/13049 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC | 0.92 | 9.2 hours |
| @xinribao/898614 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC | @kusoso/13473 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 02:39 UTC | 0.91 | 12 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @xinribao | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.94 | 6.2 hours | @xinribao (11–0) |
| @dnybgxscg | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.86 | 50 minutes | @dnybgxscg (6–0) |
| @azzxx8848 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.85 | 49 minutes | @azzxx8848 (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 22 of the 22 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,325 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 19:51 | 173,428 | -233 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 08:36 | 173,661 | -391 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 00:37 | 174,052 | -107 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:05 | 174,159 | -663 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 174,822 | -138 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 09:17 | 174,960 | -415 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 175,375 | -77 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:37 | 175,452 | -272 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 175,724 | no change |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:10 | 175,724 | -224 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 175,948 | no change |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:45 | 175,948 | -284 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:38 | 176,232 | no change |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:30 | 176,232 | -824 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 177,056 | -46 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:57 | 177,102 | -1,050 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:41 | 178,152 | -241 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:19 | 178,393 | -227 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:30 | 178,620 | -49 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:58 | 178,669 | first reading |
1,530 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 257 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 280 of 346 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,530 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 29,843 |
| Reactions total | 2,149 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 149 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54,942 reactions across 925 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9,589 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 9,166 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 8,954 | 16.3% | |
| 🎉 | 8,902 | 16.2% | |
| 🤩 | 8,888 | 16.2% | |
| 😍 | 2,443 | 4.45% | |
| 🥰 | 2,153 | 3.92% | |
| 💯 | 2,125 | 3.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,077 | 3.78% | |
| 😢 | 321 | 0.584% | |
| 👏 | 294 | 0.535% | |
| ⚡ | 21 | 0.038% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 0.016% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 927 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,942 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 September 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 132 of 346 posts held from the last 30 days (38.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😀😀😀😀|新加坡娱乐城☝️业界第一☝️ 🥰有量打款,预付拉满,月结/周结/日结多种结算方式,70%+额外人头分红! 🚀 招商合作😊😊 @kyqp665 😀 招商频道😊😊 @kyqpai01 🤖 双向联系😊😊 @kyqpjsgj3bot 🎮PG电子-金沙国际-麻将胡了-真人视讯--棋牌游戏-澳门新葡京-牛牛炸金花等各种热门游戏🎮 😙新加坡娱乐城官网: m7691.top ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🕹🕹🕹🕹 😀【认准用户名,直接点击咨询,频道其他广告信息切勿相信,避免造成损失!】
❤1👍1🔥1😢1
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作(二选一): 1、打码返佣,限指定平台; 2、占成模式,可自由选择占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接…
😀😀😀😀|新加坡娱乐城☝️业界第一☝️ 🥰有量打款,预付拉满,月结/周结/日结多种结算方式,70%+额外人头分红! 🚀 招商合作😊😊 @kyqp665 😀 招商频道😊😊 @kyqpai01 🤖 双向联系😊😊 @kyqpjsgj3bot 🎮PG电子-金沙国际-麻将胡了-真人视讯--棋牌游戏-澳门新葡京-牛牛炸金花等各种热门游戏🎮 😙新加坡娱乐城官网: m7691.top ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🕹🕹🕹🕹 😀【认准用户名,直接点击咨询,频道其他广告信息切勿相信,避免造成损失!】
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作(二选一): 1、打码返佣,限指定平台; 2、占成模式,可自由选择占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接…
👍2👏2😢2❤1🔥1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_8097022613
#吃瓜 #猎奇 没事就喜欢打台球😍 ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
👍1
#猎奇 #吃瓜 #搞笑 给啤酒口喷了没啥,有本事给群友口喷了 ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
👍1👏1😍1
#猎奇 #吃瓜 #福利姬 #擦边 玩手机不玩我? ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
❤1
#猎奇 #吃瓜 #搞笑 兄弟们,遇到一辆骚车,今天非把它给配了不可 ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
👍1
#猎奇 #吃瓜 #搞笑 大爷:谁的奶子不是奶子,人妖我也照捏不误 ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
#吃瓜 #猎奇 #商k #情绪价值 这不比谈恋爱爽吗? ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
😢2❤1👏1
#吃瓜 #猎奇 两口子吵架还是喝多了?大街上就吧衣服脱了 ⚡️订阅关注| @kusoso ⚡️投稿曝光| @kusoylbot
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,530 posts we hold for @kusoso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 81 posts on @kusoso as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚猎奇|PG博彩电子” (@kusoso), 173,428 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kusoso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.