Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kupikod Gold x PUBG Mobile

@kupikodgoldpubg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

155,315subscribers

+2,913 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247086236
TypeChannel
Username@kupikodgoldpubg
DescriptionОфициальный канал Купикод Голд по игре PUBG Mobile 🔥 Купить UC и пропуски https://clck.ru/3CzjVj 👾 Купить донат через бота https://clck.ru/3FZgro 💸 Самые низкие цены 🤝 Круглосуточная поддержка в @kupikod_bot Основной канал по мобилкам @kupikod_gold
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kupikodgoldpubg

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

152,402155,315153,858.56 August 2026 — 152,402 subscribers6 August 2026 — 152,457 subscribers7 August 2026 — 152,824 subscribers8 August 2026 — 152,992 subscribers9 August 2026 — 153,214 subscribers10 August 2026 — 153,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 154,811 subscribers12 August 2026 — 155,315 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2,913. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151,965–155,752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:06155,315+504
11 Aug 2026, 09:12154,811+1,172
10 Aug 2026, 08:25153,639+425
9 Aug 2026, 05:21153,214+222
8 Aug 2026, 04:20152,992+168
7 Aug 2026, 04:35152,824+367
6 Aug 2026, 06:31152,457+55
6 Aug 2026, 01:33152,402first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.06%
avg views ÷ 155,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (23 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total309,490
Reactions total3,815
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,760
Videos
469
Links
1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 00s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,650 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,11057.8%
👍61816.9%
👎58215.9%
🔥1213.32%
691.89%
😍220.603%
🤔180.493%
🤡180.493%
🍓140.384%
🗿120.329%
🫡120.329%
😢110.301%
💯80.219%
🤨70.192%
💔60.164%
😁60.164%
🎉50.137%
🤷‍♂40.11%
🥴30.082%
👌20.055%
2 further kinds20.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,815reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 22 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kupikodgoldpubg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,880 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Обновление 4.6 должны вернуть леопарда ❗️❗️❗️ СЕЙЧАС СКИДКИ 35%

21👍5🗿4🍓1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,690 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥Самое время пополнить UC в PUBG Mobile Впереди новые кейсы, скины и события — а мы снизили цены на пополнение. Выгода сейчас достигает 35%. А по кнопке снизу тебя ждёт промокод, с которым закупиться можно ещё выгоднее ❗️ Жми и пополняй UC по лучшей цене.

12👎12🔥2🍓1

10 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC≈8,650 views330 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Новый Золотой Костюм (26.08) 😍 Беру ❤️ Скип 👎 ✅ Пополни UC в PUBG MOBILE на абсолютно любую сумму на сайте KUPIKOD с промокодом PUBGKUP

👎23283👍4🤔4🤡3😢3💊1

7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈13,400 views93 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ивент Обновления 4.6 🥲 КАК ВАМ? ✅ Пополни UC в PUBG MOBILE на абсолютно любую сумму на сайте KUPIKOD с промокодом PUBGKUP

56👍15👎9🔥5😍5🍓3

6 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈12,700 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В игру добавили событие с вопросами по Бета Тесту 🔥

🔥3012🤨7

6 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC≈12,600 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💢 Обновление 4.6, похоже, уйдёт в вампирскую эстетику — в сети уже показали детали следующей версии. Кого встретим в новом режиме: 🦇 Nightbat — ночная летучая мышь 🩸 Vampire Elder — древний вампир 👤 Bloodwalker — ходок крови Из способностей обещают: ⛓️ Серебряную цепь Луны 🪽 Крылья сумеречной мыши Также в обновлении появятся миссии Гильдии охотников и Кровавый пакт. Вторая волна беты стартует уже сегодня, а тем

36🔥9👍6🥴2👎1😍1

5 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈10,200 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Официальная коллаборация STEAL A BRAINROT стартует уже 7 августа! ✅ Пополни UC в PUBG MOBILE на абсолютно любую сумму на сайте KUPIKOD с промокодом PUBGKUP

👎4020🤡13💔5😁3💯1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈12,800 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

61👎28🤔143👍2🤷‍♂1

3 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈14,500 views84 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кто уже залутал X-костюм? Делитесь впечатлениями в комментариях! 🔥 Сколько UC ушло и довольны ли результатом? 👀 ✅ Пополни UC в PUBG MOBILE на абсолютно любую сумму на сайте KUPIKOD с промокодом PUBGKUP

45👍18👎11🔥10

31 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC≈43,000 views1,958 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💫💫💫💫💫 66 666 UC В ЧЕСТЬ ВЫХОДА X-КОСТЮМА В PUBG MOBILE! Новый X-костюм уже в PUBG Mobile — встречаем его большим розыгрышем! 🥲 20 победителей разделят призовой фонд 66 666 UC и смогут потратить их на прокрутки X-костюма, скины и другие игровые предметы! 🌟 Как принять участие? ▫️Подпишись на Kupikod Gold × PUBG Mobile ▫️Поставь лайк на этот пост ▫️Нажми кнопку «Принять участие» 💵 А с промокодом XPUBG можно выгодн

1,380👍45766🫡11😍9🔥8🗿8💯7

31 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈13,800 views47 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. вениамин (@quzazexi) 2. Юрий (@dasmodei) 3. Star (@Stargoldil) 4. Артем (@id3682425) 5. .MVP. (@Magic410) 6. KroNatS (@KroNatS) 7. Yulia (@yulmin1305) 8. BINq 👽 (@bincqq) 9. Даня Дым (@DanyaDym) 10. Darovanie (@Darovanie1337) 11. Crispin (@tokenslkeeper) 12. О (@o0o0o0o0og) 13. wabmage (@wabmag) 14. Nadin (@nadin_001_001) 15. Олеся (@olesja060686) 16. Мария (@masha_zlaya09) 1

👎22🔥178

31 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈9,990 views47 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

🥲 Итоги розыгрыша 10 000 UC в PUBG MOBILE! 💵ID 5978234 — 1 500 UC 💵 ID 2689966 — 1 000 UC 💵 ID 5548703 — 1 000 UC 💵 ID 2076202 — 500 UC 💵 ID 5568046 — 500 UC 💵 ID 3681782 — 500 UC 💵 ID 6160873 — 500 UC 💵 ID 4007578 — 500 UC 💵 ID 6257797 — 500 UC 💵 ID 3604123 — 500 UC 💵 ID 2025576 — 200 UC 💵 ID 6517198 — 200 UC 💵 ID 5707220 — 200 UC 💵 ID 760382 — 200 UC 💵 ID 3117066 — 200 UC 💵 ID 5838253 — 200 UC 💵 ID 6052828 — 200

👎2613😢8

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @kupikodgoldpubg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,001 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kupikod Gold x PUBG Mobile” (@kupikodgoldpubg), 155,315 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kupikodgoldpubg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.