Channel
@kunikidasmoon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004311004099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kunikidasmoon |
| Description | Канал, посвящённый самой каноничной паре — Кунируна.🌙📗 ──────────────────── мой дм : @sakikunikida. ──────────────────── мой инфо-канал : @ilovekunikida. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 10 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kunikidasmoon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 20 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 20 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (10 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 862 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
99 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5264883461054811347 | 20 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5368759010340153703 | 17 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5404686450425870646 | 15 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5368841357748117266 | 14 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5447178443080874091 | 13 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5377326306159506133 | 10 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5377788058093495942 | 8 | 8.08% | |
| custom 5449897801624335218 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| custom 5465236207875160338 | 1 | 1.01% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩 🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩 🤩Внимание: много буковок — Свою творческую деятельность в роли автора стихотворений, вольных стихов, поэм, рассказов и других произведений я начала несколько лет назад. В сложные времена писательство помогало мне расслабиться и разгрузить мысли, уйти в свой выдуманный мир с головой. Я пишу о людях. Мне нравится смотреть вокруг себя и удивляться тому, какое большое количество разных людей (а …
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ㅤㅤРантер-канала в тт, также саппорт Осаму Дадзая и Достоевского. Зовите меня... 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️🌟 ㅤㅤ https://t.me/Osamu_Dazai070826_X2
ㅤ 🎀🎀🎀🔠🔠🔠🔠➿ 🎀🎀🎀 🩰🩰🩰➖Ī’m ą... 🩰🩰🩰юный писатель под ником 🩰🩰➖➖🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍‼️ ㅤㅤ ㅤ –.[ с польск. - мёртвая;) ].– пишу зарисовки, фф, sad стихи 🥴 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 💠💠🤩💠🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟“Dazai” теперь в сети¡! @Osamu_Dazai070826ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
~🤩➖🔠🔠🔠🔠0️⃣*️⃣ ❤️ - ❤️ - ➖🤩🤩т о м о й б л о г , с д е л а н н ы й п о п р о с ь б е м о е й м л а д ш е й с е с т р ы . 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 — у меня есть классная идея для ивента! — я обожаю взаимодействия пейрингов в сетках... — ищу соигрока, пиши "я" Знакомо? Добро пожаловать в... 🤩 BSD SETKI CONFESSION 🤩 🤩 ...Здесь вы можете не только обсуждать определенные проекты, но и искать вдохновение, просить помощи или просто генерировать идеи для остальных игроков! Тематика тейков не ограничена. Просим ко вниманию: 🤩 🤿 …
custom 52648834610548113471custom 53687590103401537031
︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎⎯࣭ׄ⎯ 🪦 ︎︎ ︎︎︎◟ ︎new post ︎ ︎︎︎🖋 ︎ ︎︎ ︎🪦 🤩🤩Hiii. Я приняла очень важное 🤩решение — уход из сшкм. Уже ушла со всех тгк и как-то полегче стало. Сказать по правде, мне изначально не стоило здесь как-то пытаться развиваться, как-то так. Тгк я не заброшу, буду время от времени постить мерч, скетчи, лорные посты. С мьюшками также я связь не разрываю, я буду смотреть за вашими тгк и по возможности активни…
custom 53688413577481172665custom 53777880580934959423custom 53687590103401537032custom 54046864504258706462custom 54471784430808740912custom 52648834610548113471
☺️ервый интерактив подъехал! 🎀🎀 Какая вы Нами по знаку зодиака! 🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 🎀 быть подписанным на этот канал, не отписывайтесь хотя бы до окончания интерактива! 🎀 Переслать этот пост на свой ТГК и скинуть скрин. 🎀 Скинуть своего персонажа и его знак зодиака (можно свой, если не придумали ему день рождения) Актуально до: 12 августа Писать под этим постом кончено
custom 52648834610548113471
🌟🌟 : Забыла скинуть!!
СЕДЬМОЙ УЧАСТНИК (23.03.) →↓ 🌹-Саки, вы мистер бист с сосисками "Вязанка"
🤩🥹 . 🪽elcome to ... 🌫 🤩 🤩🤩🤩𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓯𝓮𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓮!! ｡〽️🌫🤩 🤩🤩🪽ove &✖️✖️🤩😎 . ˚◞ 🔲🔲 ♔ Hiii, this is my safeplace 🩶where I show love to my platonic 🩶🩶(familial) self/yumeship with the 🩶🩶United Kingdom⭐ 🌟🌟🌟🤩 🌟 𝓝𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 🌫🌫𝓐𝓭𝓪𝓹𝓽𝓮𝓻 | 𝓭𝓷𝓲 | 𝓂𝓈 | 𝓶𝓹 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎⎯࣭ׄ⎯ 🪦 ︎︎ ︎︎︎◟ ︎new post ︎ ︎︎︎🖋 ︎ ︎︎ ︎🪦 🤩🤩Вот такие вот Кунируны 🤩в виджете. Ещё раз ураа, 1900 дней!!! ︎ ︎︶⏝ #kuniruna 𓏵 🖋 ◞
custom 54046864504258706466custom 53688413577481172664custom 53773263061595061332custom 54471784430808740912
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kunikidasmoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 440,014 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐾uniruna ₊ ⊹ . ˖ .” (@kunikidasmoon), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kunikidasmoon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.