Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杰尼杰尼 Kungfuliquid

Channel

杰尼杰尼 Kungfuliquid

@kungfuliquid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,174subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508928485
TypeChannel
Username@kungfuliquid
Created4 June 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kungfuliquid

Growth

2,1742,2042,1897 August 2026 — 2,204 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,204 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,201 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,196 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,193 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,187 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,177 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,174 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,170–2,209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 13:592,174-3
24 Aug 2026, 19:262,177-6
20 Aug 2026, 23:482,183-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:242,187-6
14 Aug 2026, 13:342,193-3
11 Aug 2026, 06:562,196-5
8 Aug 2026, 08:412,201-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:182,204no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:492,204first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 June 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

367 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28176.6%
👍6517.7%
🔥102.72%
82.18%
💩20.545%
😢10.272%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2022 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Mar 2026, 03:26 UTC≈1,470 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

问题也就在这。 如果把这个框架放回现在的 Perp DEX 市场,你会发现一件有点残酷的事: 目前很多项目都还没有真正找到自己的“理想时刻”。 它们有些有不错的数据,有些产品也不差,甚至某些阶段热度也很高。 但你很难一句话说清楚: 它到底是为哪类交易者而生的 它到底定义了什么新的交易场景 它到底占住了哪一种新的用户心智 如果这几点讲不清楚,那最后竞争就很容易重新退回最原始的层面: 拼激励 拼补贴 拼上币速度 拼短期热度 拼谁现在更会讲故事 但这种竞争,在牛市里也许还能撑一阵,因为市场大、热钱多、用户新增快。 可一到熊市或者偏熊的环境,这套逻辑就会立刻变难。 这也是我觉得 Crypto 和中国电动车市场最不一样的地方。 电动车那几年,整个市场盘子是在快速扩大的。 新增用户很多,整个行业有巨大的增量,所以除了特斯拉之外,还能容得下理想、小鹏、蔚来、问界这些不同路线的玩家。 但 DEX 尤其是 Perp DEX,不

327👍3

12 Mar 2026, 03:24 UTC≈1,160 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

我觉得这里最值得借鉴的,其实不是特斯拉,而是理想。 理想当年能打出来,不是因为它把特斯拉模仿得更好。 恰恰相反,它是不跟特斯拉在同一个问题上硬卷。 特斯拉代表的是一种叙事: 科技感 先锋感 驾驶感 智能电动车 而理想切出来的是另一种叙事: 家庭 舒适 空间 长途 老人小孩都能接受 说白了,理想不是在说“我是一台更好的特斯拉”。 它是在说: 我不是给同一批人做同一个选择,我是在定义另一种场景。 这个区别非常大。 因为一旦你定义的是新场景,你就不再是龙头的替代品,而开始有机会变成自己那个细分里的第一名。 所以我现在会觉得,Hyperliquid 之后,真正有机会破局的 DEX,不一定是那个: 手续费最低的 补贴最狠的 撮合最快的 收益率最高的 而更可能是那个率先定义了一个全新用户场景的平台。 也就是说,它不该只是回答“为什么不去 Hyperliquid”,而要回答一个更重要的问题: 为什么这批用户,本来就不是

21💩2

12 Mar 2026, 03:23 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

最近在想 Hyperliquid、Lighter、Aster 这些 Perp DEX 的竞争,脑子里一直浮现的,其实不是 Crypto,而是前几年中国电动车市场的竞争。 我越来越觉得,这些市场的观察都有共性: 很多人以为竞争是在比参数,但真正决定胜负的,往往是“谁先占住了用户心智”。 就像最早大家一提到电动车,脑子里先想到的基本就是特斯拉。 “电车=特斯拉” 后面再出来很多车,不管是配置更高、价格更便宜、空间更大,还是智能化做得更激进,消费者都会先拿它们去和特斯拉比。 而一旦进入这种比较框架,其实后来者就已经有点吃亏了。 因为用户潜意识里会觉得: 你都说自己在对标特斯拉了,那为什么我不直接买特斯拉? 我觉得现在的 Perp DEX 赛道,某种程度上已经进入了这种状态。 很多交易者一想到链上永续,第一反应就是 Hyperliquid。 它已经不只是一个产品名,某种意义上开始变成一个“品类答案”。 所以问题就来了。

151

2 Nov 2025, 08:22 UTC≈3,060 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

x402是今年Coinbase 5月份就出来的标准,一直不温不火。 关注的引爆点主要是9月份三个Big Name的合作带来的。 1. 9/12 Circle示范USDC的整合 2. 9/16 Google宣布的AP2,明确引入x402 3. 9/23 Cloudflare × Coinbase的合作 我相信正常人第一眼也是看不懂这概念在讲什么,就算努力研究了也不会被吸引。因为离C端太远,而且需求不是直接感受到的,什么AI Agents结算,本来大部份人都没用几个Agents。 但是又不明觉厉,例如 $PING 的爆火和最近Launchpool的 $KITE ,一看好久不出的Launchpool,然后有看到投资背景里的Big Name(Paypal云云)。行吧,那就研究吧,所以很多老师写的优秀介绍有流量。 在我的分类上,这个就是“标准落地型叙事”。例如过去几年的(ERC-4337 / 4844 / Intents / A

👍193

31 Oct 2025, 09:58 UTC≈2,200 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

这张图今年以来的前100市值山寨和BTC的汇率表现 其中对BTC真正强势的只有 $ZEC、$XRP、$HBAR、$XLM、$OKB、$BGB、$MNT 等等少数几个 总结现象: 1. 要么是平台币有外部机会或强控盘,例如OKB的销毁和IPO预期,BGB的高控盘。 2. 要么是老美喜欢的,例如最近Naval带起的ZEC、XLM隐私,或者是HBAR。因为有外部活水引进,同样逻辑的也有BMNR兴起时的ETH,尽管不知道这波能持续多久。 而做多会飞的山寨拿住的正确率是:6/100 ⏶ WLD有过叙事,Openai+Tomlee DAT叙事,兑BTC -73.8% ⏶ SEI有过叙事,监管利好大儒辩经,兑BTC -69.9% ⏶ APT有过叙事,Jump复活内幕消息满天飞,兑BTC -78.5% ⏶ ONDO有过叙事,Blackrock御用RWA第一名,兑BTC -37.5% 是大儒们不够努力吗?不是,是因为滥发的新币让人们对叙

👍286

28 Oct 2025, 14:33 UTC≈1,700 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

https://x.com/LeePima/status/1983179506555965937 The Blockchain To House All Finance. Crypto is fragmented today, but it doesn’t need to be. For the first time, build projects, create value, and exchange assets on the same hyper-performant chain. Hyperliquid

10

23 Oct 2025, 11:33 UTC≈1,930 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1. 最重要的还是投人,而不是看赛道领域。 里面提到了一点就是前几年Openai横空而出的时候,很多人是没有预见到的,包括领域专家以及看这块的tradtional vc,yusen在采访中灵魂拷问:“如果你1年前都没有看到Openai的爆发,为什么会有自信能预判赛道呢?”所以他们选择投人,因为看事情不一定清楚,但看人能有自己的标准。优秀的人就算在赛道遇到问题也能积极转化,就算最后方向错了也能转到正确的赛道直到成功。这点Jeff早期还在做预测市场,虽然尝试下当时的环境没成功,现在做perps也已经无敌了。恰恰好是投人不投赛道的代表。 2. 一个风口,只投那个不可被替代的。 “我们认为一定要投引领者,就是投没有他这个世界上就不会有这件事的人;很多人都会高估了风口里面能承载的大公司的规模,其实很多时候一个风口最后可能成的就是一两家公司;甚至有的时候一家公司都没有成,是个假风口” 中文meme赛道可能最后能造富的(1-10M级别)

25😢1

23 Oct 2025, 11:26 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/episode/68f623ea456ffec65eac4744 a really good podcast and interview 来自真格基金的yusen 帮我梳理了这些年来在crypto一些词汇不足表达的感悟 尽管领域不一样

23 Oct 2025, 07:29 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 7 August 2026

提醒一下,提升tradexyz的waitlist排名最重要的还是交易量,Hyperliquid上多交易个几十万wu都能往前几百名,推荐提升的幅度很小很小,这是因为他们还是鼓励真实用户

22 Oct 2025, 13:52 UTC≈1,450 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

第一段分享一下我的Crypto投资观,接下来第二段会聊撸哪个大机会。 首先,Hyperliquid是我个人23-24年以来比较大的一波收获,除了公开的号之外,当时也拉了朋友批量做号以及撸Purr换积分,和大的鲸鱼没法比,但是就目前各个号目前总共下来大概小A8是有的,当然很可惜有的部分卖早了。能有这波财富效应的根本在于“参与项目最重要的3个点“。第一、参与的足够早期,23年的时候几乎是没人在玩的。第二、是Hyperliquid的Community-first的财富共享精神,以及团队的丝滑执行切入到了——第三、整个Crypto目前少数被证明有revenue以及能有增长的DEX永续合约赛道。参与地够早。足够大方和牛逼地团队,和足够长的雪道,从而幸运地获取到了整个蛋糕的一块。 那还有什么是足够早期能参与,又有牛逼的团队和足够长的雪道能够滚雪球的项目呢? 我认为 trade.xyz 是我目前比较关注的项目。 1、团队方面:他们是un

48🔥10

14 Oct 2025, 13:04 UTC≈2,660 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/monad/status/1978083577666416849?s=46

16

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kungfuliquid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杰尼杰尼 Kungfuliquid” (@kungfuliquid), 2,174 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kungfuliquid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.