下班啦 晚安喲 明天見🩵
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵

Channel
@kui690
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,659subscribers
+972 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003750460008 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kui690 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kui690 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 5,659 | +171 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 5,488 | +226 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 5,262 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 5,264 | +36 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 5,228 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 5,224 | +120 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 5,104 | +346 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 4,758 | +71 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 4,687 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,753 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
13 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
下班啦 晚安喲 明天見🩵
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
香港新朋友預約+1 🇭🇰❤️
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
來自香港的朋友捧場+1 🇭🇰 上個月就先來敲小葵, 有什麼擔心的也都先問清楚~ 這兩天到台灣後,直接連約兩天😂 真的超感謝哥哥的支持啦,嘿嘿🩵
❤1
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
🌟【小葵 Gleezy 官方入口】 因近期 TG 穩定性較不固定 小葵特別建立 Gleezy 外約班表 🔥全台班表 🔥 各地分類 🔥 相關資訊整理 皆可透過下方入口快速查看,歡迎先加入收藏 🪽小葵の⭐Gleezy:buff51 🪽 ✈️ 小葵の 總站預覽區: https://c.gleezy.top/FDL5vTio ✈️小葵の 全台私藏班表: https://c.gleezy.top/maldySAn ✈️小葵の 私藏流出所: https://c.gleezy.top/DYsTTxmy ✈️小葵の 外流交流所: https://c.gleezy.top/ErgzRQby 小葵幫你打開Gleezy的快樂傳送門⭐
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
👑 資訊:星宇 170-D奶-26歲 ⭐ 地區:#雙北 高顔值大長腿 #模特兼職 完美身材性感誘惑 服務贊 靈活的舌頭可以給你體驗雲端的感覺 🤍🤍🤍🦋聯絡小葵🦋🤍🤍🤍 🌐 @diy62 🌐 buff51 ⭐ buff51 ⭐班表: https://c.gleezy.top/maldySAn 🤩 點擊一鍵加入小葵所有茶單頻道 🤩
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
老寶 3+1 客評來啦~ 妹妹真的很讚👏 身材、外貌、服務都很OK 感謝老寶再次捧場🩵
❤1
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
老寶預約+1 配合多次的默契 10分鐘內預約成功 感謝啦 ❤️❤️
❤1
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
一上班就收驚喜 來自老朋友的捧場!❤️
❤1
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
小葵一直都在 要約直接密我喲
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
早早早
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
就說約凌晨12點之後提前預約啦!!
❤1
Signed 暴走蘿莉の小葵
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @kui690. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 357,962 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“台灣外送茶:小葵全台總班表🩵” (@kui690), 5,659 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kui690.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.