Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,020–7,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:00
7,068
+8
13 Sept 2026, 19:39
7,060
-48
10 Sept 2026, 11:59
7,108
-56
4 Sept 2026, 22:20
7,164
-26
1 Sept 2026, 16:13
7,190
-31
29 Aug 2026, 16:04
7,221
-9
26 Aug 2026, 13:23
7,230
+4
23 Aug 2026, 13:28
7,226
-18
19 Aug 2026, 15:24
7,244
-1
16 Aug 2026, 18:08
7,245
-22
13 Aug 2026, 03:35
7,267
-39
10 Aug 2026, 04:44
7,306
-19
6 Aug 2026, 19:48
7,325
+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:20
7,320
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:02
7,320
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 4 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,213 reactions across 6 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,645
17.9%
🕊
1,074
11.7%
🔥
1,070
11.6%
😭
843
9.15%
custom 5202131265850983191
720
7.82%
❤🔥
618
6.71%
👀
529
5.74%
😁
516
5.60%
👍
499
5.42%
🌭
440
4.78%
😎
409
4.44%
💘
271
2.94%
🍓
235
2.55%
👎
224
2.43%
custom 5345839604559791608
105
1.14%
😍
15
0.163%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2024 to 25 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Создали официальный новостной канал Кухни, где собрали всю актуальную информацию об инциденте → info.localkitchen.ru
Несмотря на то что расследование продолжается и виновные в отравлении ещё не выявлены, мы со своей стороны осознаём серьёзность ситуации, сочувствуем пострадавшим и стараемся поддержать всех, кого это коснулось.
Вы и ваши близкие можете написать нам в чате приложения или в Телеграме — @HelpLocalKitch…
Вчера стало известно об инциденте с потенциальным риском нашего салата Лобио, в рецепте которого использовали консервированную фасоль от одного из наших поставщиков.
Уже убрали блюдо из продажи и начали проверку всей цепочки поставок и производства. Ещё временно остановили работу приложения, чтобы дополнительно проверить вообще все продукты, даже те, которые не вызывают опасений.
Для нас самое главное — ваша безопа…
🍳 Самое время заказать себе завтрак
Собрали шпаргалку с нашим генеральным директором Антоном Лозиным, чтобы было легче определиться с выбором блюд из меню Кухни.
А с какого блюда начинается ваше идеальное утро?
Если вы тоже думали, что доставка готовой еды появилась только в 2020-м, этот пост для вас 🚲
Историк еды и автор канала «Мёд и калач» Вика Сургай рассказала: где появилась самая древняя доставка в мире, как тогда работали курьеры и что возили клиентам.
Заказывайте ужин в приложении и читайте!
Что нужно сделать, чтобы лето было незабываемым?
Ловите список на каждый год:
1. Прыгнуть в речку с тарзанки
2. Побить крапиву палкой
3. Поиграть в классики с друзьями
Ну и самый главный пункт — попробовать летние новинки из Кухни 🥗
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @kuhnyavtelege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кухня на районе” (@kuhnyavtelege), 7,068 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuhnyavtelege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
