Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КуделяTV

Channel

КуделяTV

@kudelya_tv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002012712837
TypeChannel
Username@kudelya_tv
DescriptionРекламила, рекламлю и буду рекламить! Делать деньги без рекламы может только монетный двор! Реклама\Бренды\Тренды Путешествия\Происшествия Погода\Дураки\Дороги Красноярск\Сибирь\Россия По сотрудничеству: @oksanakudelya
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kudelya_tv

Growth

1836 Aug 2026, 08:50 — 183 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:02 — 183 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:507 Aug 2026, 08:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:02183no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:50183first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 183 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
23.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held18 (9 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total34
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
275
Videos
623
Links
98

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3127.2%
2723.7%
💯97.89%
👍87.02%
😍87.02%
🤝65.26%
🥰65.26%
🤩43.51%
32.63%
😱32.63%
🤣32.63%
👏21.75%
🍾10.877%
👌10.877%
🙏10.877%
🤯10.877%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Те, кому удаётся сохранить молодость, просыпаются с одним вопросом: «Чем меня порадует сегодняшний день?» Они не прячут себя в хрустальный футляр — они разбивают шаблоны, позволяют себе десерт на завтрак и кокетничают с самой жизнью. Не гоняйтесь за эликсиром вечной молодости. Ищите искру для маленькой авантюры. Молодость любит смелых — так будьте ею. Карл Юнг когда-то заметил: женщины, которые выглядят моложе своих

2👍2🔥1🤩1🥰1😍1

2 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC79 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥21👍1💯1🤝1😱1

29 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC85 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вы думаете этот фильм- история о зависти? Это история о том, как толпа делает из живого человека экран для своих проекций. Для мужчин она не личность, а объект фантазий. Для женщин она- воплощение их собственной подавленной сексуальности и страха потери контроля. Когда человек не заявляет о себе, окружающие начинают «дорисовывать» его образ из своих личных травм и дефицитов. Люди ненавидят не Малену. Они ненавидя

1👍1👏1💯1🔥1🤝1🥰1

23 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC70 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

После альпаки обычная шерсть ощущается совсем иначе. Более тяжёлой. Менее мягкой. Менее комфортной. Потому что альпака🦙— это тот редкий материал, в котором роскошь ощущается не только внешне, но и в каждом движении. 📍Красноярск, пр. Мира, 22 📞8 (391) 200-12-25 https://t.me/alpaka_krsk24

4🔥2💯1😍1

22 Jun 2026, 05:18 UTC64 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/drdjavanshir С одной стороны, страшно не сделать подтяжку лица в 59 лет. С другой — ещё страшнее жить с мыслью, что после неё все будут видеть: ты сделала пластику. Хотя казалось бы, кому какое дело? Ну, сделала. Главное, чтобы не было вот этой «перетянутости», которую все выбирали с начала нулевых. Именно эти страхи годами останавливают многих женщин. Оксане 59 лет. Месяц назад ей выполнили подтяжк

🔥31🥰1😍1😱1

12 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTC82 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

МИРА! ЛЮБВИ! ДОБРА!

🔥21🤩1🥰1😍1🙏1

29 May 2026, 04:20 UTC131 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Девачки, все сюда😍🔥😍

🔥41👍1👏1🤩1😍1

22 May 2026, 13:09 UTC170 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Настоящие уроки о важном 👌 Никогда не будь удобным ради чужих ожиданий С детства нас учат быть хорошими. Послушными. Правильными. Такими, чтобы нас хвалили и принимали. И постепенно мы начинаем подстраиваться. Сначала под родителей. Потом под учителей. Потом под друзей, партнёров, клиентов, общество. И однажды мы уже не понимаем, где в этом всём мы настоящие. Удобный человек не спорит. Он сглаживает углы. Он терпи

2👍1💯1🔥1🥰1

22 May 2026, 12:50 UTC102 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Поколение Альфа: в чём наше главное отличие? Достаток! Изобилия достаток это главное, что у нас. Мы росли в больших ограничения. Пустые полки, опасность и полное отсутствие каких-либо возможностей Наши дети проживает совсем другое время. Изобилие, множество всего. Мозг не порадуется очередному походу в парк развлечений или шоколадке из ларька То что для Альфа минимум, для нас Роскошный максимум. Это как сытый голо

3💯2🔥1🤝1🥰1😱1

21 May 2026, 18:52 UTC86 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Изумрудный💚 Это магнетический цвет. А, если ещё рыжие волосы?!

🔥521🤩1😍1

18 May 2026, 16:41 UTC117 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Настоящая роскошь не кричит: “Посмотрите на меня!» Она создаёт ощущение. Будто рядом с этой женщиной — спокойнее. Тише. Теплее. https://t.me/alpaka_krsk24 🩶

🔥422👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kudelya_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 937,486 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КуделяTV” (@kudelya_tv), 183 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kudelya_tv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.