Channel
@kuaileyizhan023
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,093subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002691328173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kuaileyizhan023 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kuaileyizhan023 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 3,093 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 3,103 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 3,095 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 3,094 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 3,094 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (15 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,153 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧧赞助 8️⃣8️⃣ 元即可加入以下母乳爱好者永久会员 👉母乳爱好者预览频道 会员频道内容远超预览频道 会员频道内容均为人工精挑细选，一次付费，享受永久更新，炸群包补，会员群价格会随着频道内容增多而提高，早买早享受，越早买越便宜。 日本母乳AV、欧美母乳AV、国产母乳自拍,每天坚持更新，乳味十足！ 🫰8️⃣8️⃣升级会员 (通道一) 🫰 8️⃣8️⃣ 升会员(通道二) ⚠️赞助会员的朋友，完成支付获取激活码后，请到👉快乐驿站支付机器人里点击菜单“卡密兑换”，自助兑换入群链接。其他问题，请联系我们的👉客服机器人。 ⛔️注意!最近风控比较严格，如果付款遇到风险提示，不要付款，过五分钟后重新下单付款，或者换一种支付方式。
高颜值反差骚母狗 推特极品少妇 #少妇 #反差 #自拍 #高颜值 #翘臀 #美腿
清纯学生妹高颜值骚母狗 #学生妹 #反差婊 #自拍 #情侣私拍 #舔脚 #调教
性感小母狗极品颜值COC艺术扮演 大尺度露出自慰自拍 #学生妹 #反差 #COS #极品 #萝莉
在四川成功在探探同城勾搭一个辍学的精神少女 #大学生 #反差 #自拍 #嫩妹
❤1
成都艺术学院舞蹈系清纯女大学生 极品颜值火辣身材 #学生妹 #火辣身材 #肥臀细腰 #巨乳 #自拍 #高质量
❤1
80年代反差大学生少女与男朋友性爱啪啪 #反差婊 #情侣 #自拍 #大学生
鸡皮女友清纯外表超淫荡 #肥臀 #女友 #反差 #自拍
高中发育完美青春学生妹#学生妹 #萝莉 #反差 #嫩妹
极品身材反差御姐 在校大学生 黑丝高跟大长腿 性感尤物 #学生妹 #反差 #自拍 #美腿 #御姐
精神小妹在校大学生 大尺度露出自拍 #学生妹 #反差 #自拍 #嫩妹 #社会小妹
❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @kuaileyizhan023. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 542,705 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“反差学生乐园” (@kuaileyizhan023), 3,093 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuaileyizhan023.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.