6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,259–10,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:46
10,264
-5
11 Aug 2026, 11:48
10,269
-8
10 Aug 2026, 13:42
10,277
-6
9 Aug 2026, 10:51
10,283
-8
8 Aug 2026, 11:54
10,291
-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:03
10,296
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
32
Videos
10
Links
35
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
52s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
226 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
53
23.5%
🔥
28
12.4%
❤
27
11.9%
🥰
14
6.19%
👏
13
5.75%
🤡
13
5.75%
🤣
13
5.75%
❤🔥
10
4.42%
😁
10
4.42%
💯
6
2.65%
🤯
6
2.65%
👀
5
2.21%
🤓
4
1.77%
👌
3
1.33%
💔
3
1.33%
🙉
3
1.33%
🌚
2
0.885%
🏆
2
0.885%
🤔
2
0.885%
custom 6015032720873231308
1
0.442%
8 further kinds
8
3.54%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2024 to 14 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello 👋
Today we will talk about crypto fraud in 2025!
In 2025, crypto fraud continues to evolve, posing a serious threat to investors. Users should beware of investment schemes with promises of unreasonably high returns, as these are often disguised as financial consulting services. The main types of fraud include phishing, website spoofing, and "pump and dump" schemes where the price of an asset is artificially inf…
Привет 👋
Сегодня мы поговорим про криптомошенничество в 2025!
В 2025 году криптомошенничество продолжает эволюционировать, представляя собой серьезную угрозу для инвесторов. Пользователям следует остерегаться инвестиционных схем с обещаниями неоправданно высоких доходов, так как это часто маскируется под финансовые консалтинговые услуги. Основные виды мошенничества включают фишинг, подмену сайтов и «pump and dump» сх…
Guys, I want to ask you to subscribe to my friend's YouTube channel🙈
There you will see high-quality and interesting content on the game pubg mobile🫀
As well as constant streams and prize draws.
I will draw 100 USDT among those who subscribe to his telegram channel.🥳
I will post the results of the draw among the participants in 24 hours.🤯
As of the end of June, the number of cryptomats in the world reached 38,278 units. The indicator approached the maximum of December 2022 at 39,541 devices, according to Coin ATM Radar data.
A Bitcoin wallet with $61 million in assets has been activated after six years of inactivity
The long-term bitcoin holder, who had been storing his assets for six years, transferred 1,000 bitcoins (about $61 million at the current exchange rate) to the American crypto exchange Coinbase.
Bitcoin coins were purchased for $6.6 million in 2018. Large holders, also known as "old hands", are selling coins, increasing pre…
Happycoin.club - Against the background of bitcoin consolidation near the $60,000 level, the relative strength index (RSI) of the main cryptocurrency has reached the highest oversold level in more than 300 days.
🪙 Upcoming listings
Coin listings of the following projects should take place from day to day:
—> @Hamster — the drop will depend on your income per hour + secret parameters, most likely: your league, how many combos you collected, entered a cipher (we publish them constantly)
—> @TapSwap — farm coins, this is the last chance to go in and get something from the project
—> @MemeFi — the task is to kill as many bo…
👍7🔥4❤🔥3🌚2❤1🍾1🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ktw_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ktw_crypto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hamster named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“New crypto officer” (@ktw_crypto), 10,264 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ktw_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
