В нельзяграме обсуждаем тему депрессии, сложности работы с ней, здесь не буду дублировать. Рассказала о своём опыте и опыте клиентов. Под этим постом можно писать, какую тему хотелось бы обсудить здесь

Channel
Ксюша для души | КПТ | mindfulness 🕊️
@ksushamind
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
446subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002675692020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ksushamind |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ksushamind |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 446 | -2 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 448 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 446 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 449 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 453 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 458 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 457 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 457 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 00s
- Average length
- 2m 00s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 25 | 28.7% | |
| custom 5264961371761554904 | 24 | 27.6% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 25.3% | |
| custom 5262903837613632450 | 9 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5262733589404988081 | 4 | 4.60% | |
| custom 5262501570976690564 | 3 | 3.45% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ksushamind. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Как я победила тревогу и снова начала жить? Клиенты, кто читал меня в соц сетях, часто с такой надеждой в глазах спрашивают "Ксюша, ну вот тебе же удалось от агорафобии избавиться и снова выходить из дома, жить как нормальный человек, что именно помогло?" Осознание помогло, что надо взять себя в руки и работать как проклятая. Вот и весь секрет. К сожалению, мы так устроены, что всегда стараемся найти вариант полег…
custom 52649613717615549042💘1custom 52627335894049880811custom 52629038376136324501
Пробовали ли вы уже практики осознанности?
- Да, есть результат29%
- Да, пользы не видел0%
- Нет, не интересно29%
- Нет, но хотел бы попробовать43%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Осознанность vs антидепрессанты Это реальные исследования, да и я проверяла на своем тревожном расстройстве. Почему же тогда все вдруг не излечились данными практиками? Здесь нужна дисциплина, время и усилия Сейчас эра дофаминоваго ожирения, мы и в магазины-то перестали ногами ходить, а тут колоссальный труд 🤷♀️
💯5
Воображаемые и реальные события активируют в мозге одни и те же нейронные сети, наш мозг одинаково реагирует и на то, что происходит в реальности, и на наши мысли о реальных или воображаемых ситуациях. Есть очень простая, но классная техника, которую я использую прямо на сессии, если тревога становится названным третьим. Ее суть проста – мысленно мы переносимся в место, где когда-то чувствовали себя в полной безопа…
custom 52629038376136324503custom 52649613717615549041
Когда уже поздно идти к психологу? Переодически кто-нибудь задает вопрос из разряда «я не знаю, может вы мне уже не поможете и надо к психиатру?» или транслирует идею «да пока не особо моя проблема мне мешает, я справляюсь сам» Давайте обсудим – когда лучше идти к психологу и может ли "быть поздно" для психотерапии? К сожалению, у меня есть не только опыт профессионала, но и личная история, где небольшая тревога п…
💯4custom 52625015709766905641custom 52629038376136324501custom 52649613717615549041
+ страх умереть, реальное ощущение, что у тебя инсульт/удар итд
💯4custom 52629038376136324503custom 52627335894049880811
Photo, posted without a caption
💘7💯3
Пройдите тест, максимально честно отвечая на вопросы, если среди них более 50% набрала одна или несколько из данных схем – ваши психологические проблемы (тревога, апатия, перфекционизм, прокрастинация..) будут эффективнее решаться не поверхностно, а через перенаправление внимания себя, свои потребности, ценности, ценность: Покорность – чрезмерная передача контроля своей жизни другим во избежание гнева, наказания или…
custom 52649613717615549043💯1
Если в детстве любовь, принятие или похвала зависели от твоих успехов, выполнения каких-то действий (помог маме, прибрался) психика могла усвоить простое правило: «Чтобы быть ценным (чтобы меня любили), нужно постоянно заслуживать» Когда собственная ценность начинает оцениваться исключительно какими-либо достижениями и/или одобрением окружающих, ты теряешь связь с собой, собственными потребностями. Постоянно сравн…
custom 52649613717615549044💯1
Как часто вы говорите себе: «Я молодец. Я отлично справляюсь»?
- Никогда15%
- Очень редко45%
- Часто30%
- Всегда доволен собой10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52649613717615549043💘1
Знаю, что многих раздражают разговоры о родителях, но факт остается фактом – именно в детстве у человека формируются убеждения о себе, людях и мире вокруг. Происходит это за счёт родителей или иных значимых взрослых, так как для ребенка воспитывающие люди не просто родственники, это зеркало мира. И именно в детстве формируется фундамент нашей личности, на котором строится вся дальнейшая жизнь. 💘 – если тема интерес…
💘9custom 52649613717615549043
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ksushamind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пробовали ли вы уже практики осознанности?
- Да, есть результат29%
- Да, пользы не видел0%
- Нет, не интересно29%
- Нет, но хотел бы попробовать43%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как часто вы говорите себе: «Я молодец. Я отлично справляюсь»?
- Никогда15%
- Очень редко45%
- Часто30%
- Всегда доволен собой10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ксюша для души | КПТ | mindfulness 🕊️” (@ksushamind), 446 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ksushamind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.