Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Столярка для начинающих

Channel

Столярка для начинающих

@kstolyar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,612subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001137617145
TypeChannel
Username@kstolyar
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kstolyar

Growth

17,60917,62917,6197 August 2026 — 17,629 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,629 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,628 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,619 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,617 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,616 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,609 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,610 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,612 subscribers17,6127 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,606–17,632 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:5517,612+2
14 Aug 2026, 19:4517,610+1
13 Aug 2026, 07:2517,609-7
12 Aug 2026, 04:0517,616-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:3117,617-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:5117,619-8
8 Aug 2026, 22:2017,627-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:1917,628-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:4517,629no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:3317,629first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 17,612 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,680
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.866%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held18 (28 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total36,830
Reactions total319
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 07s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

638 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍44669.9%
🔥17928.1%
🤝71.10%
👏60.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 18 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kstolyar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,620 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

За что я люблю подобные проекты, так это за то, что на выходе получается интересная вещь при минимуме инструмента и материалов. Именно такое решение и показано в этом видео — простая полка из доступных материалов, которая смотрится как авторская работа. Смотрим, вдохновляемся, берём на заметку. 👇

👍22🔥4

9 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,450 views33 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥33

9 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈2,380 views30 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

немножко воскресного чтива.

👍28🤝2

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,020 views31 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Кого на видео не хватает? С пятницей мастеровые и хороших выходных!

🔥27👏3👍1

6 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈3,060 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Решил попробовать кое-что новое. Запускаю цикл видео, где буду показывать свои проекты и рассказывать, что делаю. Без сложных терминов, простым языком. В первом выпуске — старый венский стул, который недавно купил. Покажу, почему он меня зацепил и с чего начал. Снято на кухне во время ремонта, так что не судите строго по фону 🙂Подробности и видео — уже на Boosty. Переходите по ссылке 👇 https://boosty.to/stolyarka

👍14🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈3,500 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, подскажем мастеровому? Свое мнение я ему высказал, какие будут версии? Добрый день. У меня к вам небольшой вопрос профессионального характера Я тренируюсь делать торцевые доски, для самой первой пробной версии взял простую Сосну, чисто технологию понять да руку набить, как говорится Для выравнивания плоскости уже готового образца торцевой доски у меня была сделана каретка для фрезера (1 фото). Каретка прак

👍9🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC≈4,600 views38 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Клеит не клей, клеит рубанок. (Столярная мудрость, проверенная временем) Дерево — живое, и после склейки может проявиться щель. Вариантов два: вставка или шпаклёвка. Самый популярный совет в интернете — смешать ПВА с древесной пылью. Но это бюджетный и ненадёжный вариант: ПВА даёт усадку, оставляет жирные пятна под маслом/морилкой, а со временем состав может вылететь из щели. Плюс только один — точное совпадение цве

👍32🔥4👏1🤝1

22 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈5,600 views58 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Video

Этот треугольник изменил плотницкое дело в 1925 году. И до сих пор он есть в ящике каждого мастера. Почему? Смотрите в новом видео. И напоминаю про свой канал на бусти https://boosty.to/stolyarka

🔥33👍25

20 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC≈5,350 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

С началом рабочей недели, мастеровые! Сегодня в нашем канале — небольшой, но полезный лайфхак по работе со смывкой от нашего коллеги Алексея. Но прежде чем переходить к советам, давайте вспомним главное: техника безопасности — превыше всего! Работа со смывкой требует внимательности, поэтому не пренебрегайте защитными очками и перчатками, а также убедитесь, что помещение хорошо проветривается, и пользуйтесь защитой

👍26

17 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈5,250 views50 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

За видео сорян – пятница. 😄 Почему так нельзя шлифовать? При работе с орбитальной шлифмашиной по дереву сильный нажим и отсутствие пылеотвода — разберемся. Последствия надавливания: • Ямы. Даже если давить строго сверху, из-за вибрации подошва заваливается на ребро и вгрызается в волокна. Локальные впадины становятся заметными после нанесения покрытия. • Блокировка хода.Давление тормозит вращение подошвы, и маши

👍47🔥3

16 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC≈4,250 views32 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, важное сегодня! 2 года назад я выпустил гайд по столярному делу. За это время он помог десяткам новичков не наступить на те самые грабли, на которые наступал я. Теперь он доступен на Boosty для уровня «Друг канала» и выше. Что внутри: — Никакой воды. Только структура: инструмент, породы дерева, масло vs лак, что реально нужно, а без чего можно обойтись. — Написано для начинающих. Никаких сложных терминов

👍31🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC≈4,860 views51 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Video

Чем покрыть деревянную разделочную доску? Вазелиновым маслом? Льняным? А может, специальным составом от производителя? В интернете столько мнений, что голова идет кругом. Я перелопатил кучу информации, плюс несколько лет моего опыта и сейчас расскажу, что реально работает, а что — пустая трата времени и денег. Спойлер: ответ вас может удивить. А вы чем покрываете свои доски? Делитесь в комментариях — будет интере

👍49🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kstolyar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 932,894 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Столярка для начинающих” (@kstolyar), 17,612 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kstolyar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.