Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 33 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,403–3,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:55
3,452
+8
17 Sept 2026, 20:16
3,444
-4
13 Sept 2026, 07:37
3,448
-6
9 Sept 2026, 11:01
3,454
+15
4 Sept 2026, 08:57
3,439
+20
31 Aug 2026, 20:44
3,419
+9
28 Aug 2026, 10:04
3,410
-4
25 Aug 2026, 11:52
3,414
-4
24 Aug 2026, 11:45
3,418
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
1m 36s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
185 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
113
61.1%
❤🔥
70
37.8%
😁
2
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
еще хочу подчеркнуть: меня ее видео ни в коем случае не обидело, просто решила с вами обсудить вопрос подачи
вообще не вижу ничего плохого в том, когда берут чужие видео и делают на них разбор
так же я не претендую на истину в последней инстанции и не говорю, что мое мнение единственно верное
в своих видео я всегда делюсь исключительно своим опытом в макияже себя + опытом как визажиста который работают абсолютно с ра…
я не негативлю и не обижаюсь, но мне кажется пипец не корректно обрезать МОЕ начало ровно на фразе 24 года и отвечать на комментарии так как она отвечает )))))
мнения?))))))
вчера видел выложила, а тут поделиться с вами забыла! исправляюсь🤭
одни из моих самых любимых румян, которые мне нравятся даже больше чем rare beauty (клянусь!)
китайский бренд Phofay, я заказывала на вб
• 02 нежно-розовый 440262450
• 03 ярко розовый 438858277
это именно артикулы по которым покупала я, могут не дать в наличии, но я думаю можно глянуть и у других продавцов
очень нежная текстура, невероятное сияние,…
в перерывчике расскажу🤭
эти спф от d’Alba топ! протестировано в самое пекло
лицо не сгорело вообще, даже намека нет
а вот тело……о грустном не будем🙂
дальбе срочно надо выпускать спф и для тела, а то это не дело
как и обещала-свотчи всех оттенков community collection 💚
сверху вниз:
NS, EB, LM, RK, JI
❤9❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kseniyaalfyorova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Shikstudio| Наталья Шик @shikstudio · 56,822 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kseniyaa.alfyorovaa” (@kseniyaalfyorova), 3,452 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kseniyaalfyorova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.