О ком фантазирует твой мужчина на самом деле? Когда я узнала эту информацию, то сама была немного в шоке, потому что… Опросили 100 мужчин: "О какой женщине вы фантазируете?" 94% ответили одинаково. И это НЕ про скромность, заботу и терпение. Если ты всё ещё веришь в это — ты проебала всё, что может возбудить. «Женщину, от которой пахнет желанием» «Которая сама хочет. Кайфует. Не терпит» Пока ты стесняешься попрос…

Channel
Ксения Хазова, сексолог, коуч, консультант🔞
@ks_ssorok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,458subscribers
-148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001376099375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ks_ssorok |
| Description | 🔥дипломированный с🔞ксолог, консультант в сфере секса и отношений 🔥создатель академии развития гармоничных отношений https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=675c1fbd31a9292acd9a6c77®istryType=bloggersPermission https://www.instagram.com/kssorok PR |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ks_ssorok |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 21,458 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 21,463 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 21,468 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 21,478 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 21,481 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 21,487 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 21,497 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 21,511 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 21,518 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 21,534 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 21,542 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 21,552 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 21,556 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 21,566 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 21,570 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 21,580 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 21,582 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 21,594 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 21,597 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 21,606 | first reading |
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.84%
- avg views ÷ 21,458 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 610
- 62 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.918%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 63
- of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,839 |
| Reactions total | 216 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,910
- Videos
- ≈1,020
- Links
- ≈775
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 16s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
218 reactions across 37 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 48.2% | |
| 🔥 | 62 | 28.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 9.17% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 6.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 5.50% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.459% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Для тех, кто хочет что-то подобное испытать: 12 быстрых секс-лайфхаков, которые сведут его с ума ⚡️ Ловите плотную подборку приемов, которые работают безотказно и мгновенно переключают твое состояние и реакцию мужчины. Сохраняйте себе в закладки: 🔥Дыхание животом. Глубокий вдох низом живота моментально отключает мыслительный шум и переносит внимание из головы в гениталии. 🔥Разжим челюсти. Зубы и таз связаны напрям…
❤5🔥3
Мой новый любовник в восторге от моих навыков🙈 Автор этого отзыва настоятельно попросила, чтобы я его не просто забрала в свою коллекцию отзывов (я уже 6 лет веду отдельный тг-канал, который почти ежедневно пополняется) , а выложила. Делаем 💔 Для меня отдельная радость и удовольствие видеть результаты учениц спустя время. Потому что техники-они не просто про сделать мужчине и себе приятно здесь и сейчас. Это всегд…
🍓3🔥3❤🔥1
Огромное количество женщин в постели совершают одну и ту же ошибку — движения линейно, просто вперёд-назад, подстраиваясь под ритм мужчины. Это быстро превращает близость в механическую рутину. Тело привыкает, рецепторы притупляются, а страсть затухает. Чтобы полностью перестроить ощущения, вернуть дикий азарт и заставить его забыть, как его зовут, используй «4 священных движения» тазом. Эти движения работают в люб…
❤7😁1
Не обманула. Забрала галстук с собой домой. Попрактикуюсь😈 if u know what i mean
🔥5😁1
Когда твоя хореограф сказала, что тебя сегодня ждет сюрприз и…
Video message, posted without a caption
Из первых уст, как говорится)
Думаете нам много надо? Говори что всех побежу и еще чуть подсласти неутомимым жеребцом и всё, мужик в кармане. Нам, мужчинам, даже комплименты никто не говорит, так что и лесть мы не сможем распознать в большинстве случаев
❤🔥2
✅Я НЕ ЗАМЕЧАЮ, ПОКА ТЫ НЕ ЗАЦИКЛИШЬСЯ "Я не вижу её целлюлит. Честно. Пока она сама не начинает тыкать в него пальцем и причитать. Тогда да, начинаю замечать. Но не потому что он там есть — а потому что она постоянно об этом говорит." Так сказал мне однажды мой знакомый мужчина. И это реально работает. Вы сами обращаете его внимание на то, чего он не видел. Перестаньте подсвечивать свои "недостатки" — и он их забу…
🔥4❤2❤🔥1
Всегда найдется женщина красивее, моложе, интереснее тебя. Когда я говорю о том, что у меня нет конкуренток, это не значит, что я ставлю себя на пьедестал. Это значит, что я в принципе не включаюсь в сравнение. Потому что там, где есть сравнение, ВСЕГДА есть победитель и есть проигравший. И когда мы делаем ставку только на внешнее, как бы сильно вы ни старались, в любой момент вы можете оказаться в проигрыше. И в…
❤1
У меня на игре «Женщина, которую хотят» сейчас 90 процентов участниц с таким запросом. Всем угождаю, всех обслуживаю, сама заебалась в край. И знаете что в этом самое паршивое? Что люди привыкают. И не ценят. И получается, чтобы получить новую порцию любви, одобрения, восхищения, нужно стараться еще сильнее. А сил на это уже нет.
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @ks_ssorok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 541,176 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bachinskaya_oxana · 70,020
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ксения Хазова, сексолог, коуч, консультант🔞” (@ks_ssorok), 21,458 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ks_ssorok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.