Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for шурх шурх

Channel

шурх шурх

@kryshaidenespisha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003624031972
TypeChannel
Username@kryshaidenespisha
Descriptionну той во скиньте ссилку друзям я хочу блохером стати
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kryshaidenespisha

Growth

1536 August 2026 — 153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 153 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:15153no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:33153first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
870.2%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 202628 July 2026)
Views total21,302
Reactions total468
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
153
Videos
22
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

471 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12125.7%
🤮8518.0%
😭6313.4%
🤯5511.7%
🖕5411.5%
💔275.73%
🤬173.61%
🔥163.40%
51.06%
51.06%
💊51.06%
🥴40.849%
💘30.637%
😡30.637%
🕊20.425%
😈20.425%
❤‍🔥10.212%
💯10.212%
😢10.212%
🤡10.212%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 471reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC296 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3🤯2🤡1

28 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC303 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7💯1

28 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC302 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6🤯6

28 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC291 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9🤯3😈1

25 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,760 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Повз образи — образотворче мистецтво набирає мазків. Сприймаючи наратив за позитив, проявляється негатив непроговорених підтекстів. Проходячи повз, не макаючи п’яти в чернь, обрав шлях. Зрікся власних слів. Освоїв роль, продиктовану постановником. Образи в руках — Лего - чоловічки. Про дружбу, про чесноту — голосом Naruto. Дев’ятихвостий лис в’є гніздо із сухожиль і кісток. Придаток закриває потребу. Одну чи дві.

🔥128💘3🤯3🕊2❤‍🔥1😭1

25 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,550 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну і той во дуже важливо для мене. Рідко в мене виходить прожити стрес екологічно ну в цей раз от, що народився вірш. Приділіть хвилинку часу. Він трохи довгий)(:

💔6😢1😭1

25 Jul 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,780 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Відповідь від Бармалія. В переписці він не відмовляється від своїх дій, але дуже не серйозно ставиться загалом до ситуації. Кружочок з бритою головою з підписом - щоб не впізнали на Подолі. Він пропонував приватно вибачитись, але я цього особисто не потребую. Я потребую щоб він відчув наслідки. Більше якусь приватну комунікацію ні з ким з нападників я вести не збираюсь.

🖕548💊5🥴4

24 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,520 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Доповнення Я перша вийшла в комунікацію з Андрієм і Павлом. Попередила про те, що не буду замовчувати. Павло одразу визнав свою провину вибачився особисто та зробить це публічно. Андрій спитав мене в чаті, що він наробив. Прочитав повідомлення яке ви читали і ніц)() просто ігнор

😭194🤬3

24 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTCviews —

шурх шурх pinned «Привіт. Ділюсь з вами вчорашньою історією яка сталась зі мною на Подольському бамбінбоні під жовтнем. Зараз я ділюсь саме із близькою спільнотою, щоб відчувати себе безпечно ідучи додому повз жовтень. Я хочу далі відчувати безпеку серед друзів на спаській.…»

24 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Оновлення - імʼя продюсера, що був другим учасником Павло Ступак

5🤬3😡3

24 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,530 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ще раз дякую всім за підтримку. Мене вже повідомила одна чудова людина про наслідки з якими зіштовхнувся Андрій вже. Я дуже дякую Хвильовому та Спаській 12 за бан. Спільнота Бамбінбону також мене підтримала. День-два і я також поділюсь цим в соцмережах. Підскажіть кого відмічати на пості або звернутись для медіа підтримки. Я б дуже хотіла зробити це «правильно» і щоб це не був просто крик в нікуди, але я зараз в сп

35🔥4😈1

23 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTC≈1,770 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

дякую всім за підтримку крім огиди від не бажаного доторку і слів за цей день я пройшла весь спектр можливих папайок. Я згадала це відчуття придатку. жінка як інструмент закриття потреб чоловіка. чи то емоційних / чи то сексуальних, самоствердження через обʼєкт. і це в Україні де ми всі, як ніби знаємо, що таке біль і сум. сльози, бажання справедливості, підтримка ближнього. Ми знаємо історії про насилля російськ

😭4113🤬3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kryshaidenespisha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 670,794 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“шурх шурх” (@kryshaidenespisha), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kryshaidenespisha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.