8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,567–1,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 11:07
1,597
+2
24 Aug 2026, 03:58
1,595
+13
20 Aug 2026, 05:53
1,582
-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:16
1,583
+1
13 Aug 2026, 12:35
1,582
+7
10 Aug 2026, 20:01
1,575
+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:18
1,571
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:11
1,571
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.0%
avg views ÷ 1,597 subscribers
Avg views / post
655
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 June 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
1,310
Reactions total
120
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,678 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
391
23.3%
🔥
356
21.2%
🎉
233
13.9%
👍
191
11.4%
❤🔥
101
6.02%
😁
92
5.48%
🤯
63
3.75%
🤣
43
2.56%
😱
24
1.43%
💯
21
1.25%
🥰
19
1.13%
🍾
17
1.01%
😈
17
1.01%
💋
16
0.954%
🤪
16
0.954%
🗿
15
0.894%
🤩
14
0.834%
👏
8
0.477%
🤝
8
0.477%
⚡
7
0.417%
10 further kinds
26
1.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krol_krolb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Коротко о ВК 😎
Последние ролики через функцию переноса заливаются уже пятый день. Напрямую заливать не могу, потому шо сразу банят за авторские без возможности подать апелляцию (такого функционала там просто нет)
По инфе сверху на канале ноль видео ☀️
⚡️ Следующий фильм на разбор - "Живая сталь"
В мире недалёкого будущего зрелища ради живых боксёров заменили на роботов, и главный герой пытается занять своё место под солнцем робобокса, попутно выстраивая отношения с сыном
Один из моих самых любимых фильмов, смотрел его раз 5 точно. Сегодня во время пересмотра несколько раз пробрало до мурашек, а в какой-то момент даже чуть было не вывалилась скупая. Короче, реком…
⚡️ КРолик вышел ⚡️
Что делать, если во время государственного всеобщего рубилова оказался в ловушке в собственном доме? Банда агрессивных подростков ломится внутрь, подозрительный бродяга уже забрался в здание, а наказания за преступления не будет.
В этом видео мы разберём все косяки персонажей данного кино по ходу действия сюжета и посмотрим на альтернативные логичные варианты решения проблем, чтобы разобраться - …
⚡️ КРолик вышел ⚡️
Как быть, если в попытках творить добро попал в замес с участием серьёзных преступников? Благие намерения оборачиваются смертельной опасностью, неожиданные союзники под ударом, а злодеи, в отличие от супергероев, очень даже существуют.
В этом видео мы разберём все косяки персонажей данного кино по ходу действия сюжета и посмотрим на альтернативные логичные варианты решения проблем, чтобы разобрат…
⚡️ Ролик готов
Видео уже на Бусти (доступно по подписке). Ориентировочно через неделю, когда завершится проверка по авторским правам, выйдет на Ютубе 🔥
https://boosty.to/krol-krolb
Мой пятый страйк 😊
Как и всегда, отправил запрос на разблокировку, в связи с чем выход обзора на "Пипец" на Ютубе вынужденно задерживается на 2 недели.
Без паники, работа над следующим роликом уже ведётся, оба два выйдут друг за другом 🐰
И тем не менее, Universal Pictures - жопошники 😊
⚡️ Следующий фильм на разбор - "Судная ночь"
В мире, где каждый год на одну ночь снимаются все запреты на любые преступления, включая убийства, главный герой со своей семьёй по случайному стечению обстоятельств оказывается в смертельной ловушке в собственном доме и задаётся одной вполне конкретной целью - дожить до рассвета.
Кино из разряда "посмотрел - пробил себе ладонью лоб - забыл", но это и прекрасно, потому ч…
⚡️ Ролик готов
Видео уже на Бусти (доступно по подписке). Ориентировочно через неделю, когда завершится проверка по авторским правам, выйдет на Ютубе 🔥
https://boosty.to/krol-krolb
Кандидат номер 1 на цитату сос мыслом в конец ролика 😊
😁40❤8👍4❤🔥2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @krol_krolb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кроль 🐰” (@krol_krolb), 1,597 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krol_krolb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.