коротко о результатах за последние сутки. на маленьком канале с очень узкой аудиторией. кто там говорил, что ютьюб не работает?
❤16👍6🔥1

Channel
@kristina_medinskya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,350subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001437088570 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kristina_medinskya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kristina_medinskya |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 2,350 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 2,347 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 2,350 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 2,357 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 2,364 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 2,374 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 2,372 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 2,374 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 2,373 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 2,370 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 2,367 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 2,365 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,364 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 2,364 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
437 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 275 | 62.9% | |
| 💯 | 61 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 13.0% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 3.89% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 2.52% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 0.915% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 0.915% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.686% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.229% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 437 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kristina_medinskya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
коротко о результатах за последние сутки. на маленьком канале с очень узкой аудиторией. кто там говорил, что ютьюб не работает?
❤16👍6🔥1
недавно у моего дедушки был день рождения. Ему исполнилось бы 86, но почти 5 лет назад, сразу после моей свадьбы, его не стало тогда я впервые глубоко задумалась о жизни и смерти. вот буквально: почему люди уходят, а что они чувствуют и предчувствуют ли это? и много других как и почему… но за каждой потерей всегда новое явление. ушел дедушка и в нашу жизнь пришел Марк. совпадение это? случайность? для себя я много…
❤28🔥7
с отрывом буквально в 2 голоса победил разбор ситуации Валерии Чекалиной - запишу для вас подкаст ну а запуск Саши Митрошиной я разберу в своем клубе, пожалуй 😎 есть там то, что точно хочется обсудить
❤15
Posted without readable text
🔥7❤4🍓1
друзья, давно у нас не было с вами разборов, а инфополе как будто само подкидывает поводы давайте выберем, кого с точки зрения репутации и медиа обсудим в новом подкасте p.s. прошлые разборы можно почитать по тегу #точноПродюсер
у меня всё 😂 извините, вырвалось и да, спасибо всем, кто прислал все, что просила. в течение суток отсмотрим все и свяжемся с теми, кто подходит под формат проекта
❤26💯15👏6🔥5👎3👍2🤣1
прочитав комментарии и личные сообщения я поняла, почему многие сидят без работы, даже имея неплохое портфолио поделиться? но это будет очень неприятно, сразу говорю
💯46❤6
друзья, в команду ищу монтажера, который: - умеет собирать короткие ролики на высоком уровне - монтирует НЕ в телефоне (или не только в телефоне, потому что исходники сняты на камеру и ни один телефон их не потянет) - имеет чувство вкуса присылайте В КОММЕНТАРИИ СВОИ РАБОТЫ и прайс сразу. пересылайте это сообщение талантливым ребятам 🙏🏻❤️ UPD: ребята, пожалуйста, не предлагайте мне продакшены и компании, у меня св…
❤11🍓3
я решила распродать большую часть своего гардероба много вещей надевала на 1-2 раза и покупала только на мероприятия или съемки. Все в хорошем или идеальном состоянии подробности тут: https://t.me/+5haaxu4Zazc2ZWEy
❤10👍3👀1🤓1
у нас вышел первый фильм о предпринимателях - ВЫШЕ СТАИ он не про успешный успех, хоть про деньги мы, конечно, много говорили, и про цели, и про достижения но это фильм о человеке, который не боится рисковать, продолжает идти, даже когда необходимости нет и не боится делиться «… для чайки по имени Джонатан Ливингстон полёт был важен, а еда – это так…» смотрите фильм и всё поймете ❤️ 📺 Youtube 💙 ВКонтакте
❤30🔥10👏3
это было примерно 10 лет назад. я переживала худшие из возможных отношения, в которых было всё, что называют абьюзом, психологическим насилием и после которых прописывают антидепрессанты, потому что в моменте хотелось выйти и не из себя, к сожалению. венцом всего это безобразия стало не мое обращение к психологу, а покупка, ВНИМАНИЕ, курсов про то, как стать женщиной плюс [да, я не опечаталась]😂 да, у каждого в моло…
❤45🤗4
многие, кто давно подписан на этот канал в курсе, что интервью - мой любимый формат длинного контента. в агенстве мы специализируемся именно на этом формате и преуспели в нем, в своих канал я тоже снимаю интервью и они набирают хорошие просмотры. я искренне считаю, что умение брать и давать интервью - это важный навык для каждого эксперта. поэтому в клубе МЕДИЙНОЕ МЕСТО темой месяца был выбран именно этот формат -…
❤13🔥5👏4💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kristina_medinskya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Извините, вырвалось” (@kristina_medinskya), 2,350 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kristina_medinskya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.