Channel
@kristasaadma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,334subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001247633677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kristasaadma |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kristasaadma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 3,334 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 3,337 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:20 | 3,338 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 3,339 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 3,339 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 13 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 37 | 52.1% | |
| 💘 | 15 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 19.7% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 2.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— я яблоко?🍎 — я груша? 🍐 Я думала, что я SMM специалист, но оказалось мой список профессий гораздо длиннее... Иногда мне кажется, что в моей работе маркетинг — это только верхушка айсберга. Сгенерировала подборку про свои «теневые» роли. Уверена, коллеги-маркетологи узнают в этом свои будни, а клиенты свои любимые вопросы 🌝🤍 Делюсь промтом для ChatGPT, чтобы примерить на себя разные профессии, просто скопируй ↓ …
😍14⚡2👍2
Нашла для вас еще один классный шрифт 🙂↕️🤲🏻 аккуратный, похож на рукописный, как мы любим! Он будто специально создан для эстетичных весенних каруселей. сохраняйте, экспериментируйте & не забывайте про реакции ♣️ #шрифты
😍8💘6👍5
Эра «человеческого» контента: почему UGC побеждает AI? Пока нейросети соревнуются, кто выдаст более «ваушный» креатив, рынок совершил крутой разворот: чем круче ИИ рисуют рекламу, тем дороже бренды готовы платить за простые UGC видео на айфон 📲 Причина проста: мы устали от цифрового шума. 56% пользователей не доверяют тому, что выглядит слишком идеально. В 2026 побеждает тот, кто сохранил трушность и человечность.…
😍3💘2🤓2
I don’t wanna Valentine, I do want Valentino 💗 Мои великолепные и талантливые girls! Сегодняшний день — отличный повод напомнить себе: главная история любви в вашей жизни — это та, которую вы строите с самой собой. Влюбляйтесь в свои идеи, горите своим делом и никогда не соглашайтесь на меньшее. Помните: сначала мы наполняем себя, а потом — этот мир своими проектами, смыслами и красотой. Ловите порцию эстетики дл…
😍4👍2💘2
♥️ Подборка стикеров к 14.02 День Святого Валентина уже завтра, и если вы ещё не успели подготовить контент — сейчас самое время! Стикеры в png формате оставляю в комментариях, как обычно 🙌🏻
💘5👍4😍4
В начале зимы я сделала фото у камина. Хотелось насладиться моментом, и про видео я забыла Хорошо, что в 2026 это легко поправимо — пара кликов в ИИ, и огонь снова живой 🔥 Сейчас мир соцсетей разделился на два лагеря: те, кто боится ИИ и кто заваливает ленту трендами. Я — за качественный симбиоз. Нейросети должны упрощать рутину, добавлять объема дизайну и оживлять то, что не успел снять объектив. Но возводить их …
😍4⚡1👍1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @kristasaadma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 712,910 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стикеры & вдохновение 🕊️ @krista_saadma” (@kristasaadma), 3,334 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kristasaadma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.