Подпишитесь на блог нищего арбитражника: @ARBI_TRAFFIC

Channel
Кристина Кон | Арбитраж трафика
@kris_traff
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,081subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001863701410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kris_traff |
| Description | Женский блог об арбитраже трафика. Присоединяйтесь, будет интересно. Сайт: http://cpalenta.ru Чат: @cpa_podslushano Вакансии: @hr_affiliate Связь: @traff_girl Каналы и чаты о трафике: https://t.me/addlist/EfbBB4gPLtdhZGU6 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kris_traff |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 01:21 | 11,081 | +133 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:45 | 10,948 | +4 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:37 | 10,944 | +4 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:44 | 10,940 | +3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:00 | 10,937 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:48 | 10,941 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:50 | 10,953 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 10,950 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:21 | 10,939 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 10,945 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 10,949 | +8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 10,941 | +31 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 10,910 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 10,908 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 10,915 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 10,911 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 10,917 | +4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 10,913 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 10,916 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 10,908 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.72%
- avg views ÷ 11,081 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 302
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.03%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (4 November 2025 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 905 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 89
- Videos
- 15
- Links
- 56
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 19.4% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Обучение нейросетям ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini и другие нейронки могут решить ваши проблемы и стать дополнительным источником ежемесячных затрат. Так вот, некоторые специалисты решили продавать свои «знания» за звонкую монету. Для этих целей они закупают рекламу в youtube (Google Ads). 1. «Мой цифровой аватар». Даша Чер научит как заработать на соцсетях без своего участия на Теслу. Видеокреатив. На лендинге предлаг…
👍3🤯1
Всё для создания креативов. Сервисы, нейросети для монтажа. Новые подходы и разбор связок. ➡️ Подписаться: @traff_creo
⚡️ Почему команды начали массово отказываться от спенд-модели В чатиках шепчутся, что многие баинги, которые сначала активно переходили на спенд, а теперь так же активно откатываются к CPA. ☝️Причем не потому что CPA в моменте реально выгоднее, а потому что заявленные преимущества спенда могут резко перестают работать. В новом материале объясняю что происходит и почему спендовая модель оказалась интересной только …
👍4👏2🤡1🤣1
⚠️ Чтобы байеры внутри команды не скамили на тысячи $, подпишитесь на SCAM Ленту: @black_list_traffic Также не стесняйтесь присылать свои истории 🤝
🍒 Бренд-маркетинг в iGaming: как конкурировать с лидерами рынка, если ты в офшоре Всегда было интересно, как компании без локальных лицензий конкурируют со Stake, Bet365 и DraftKings? Недавний рейтинг Blask показал, что некоторым это удается весьма успешно. Разбирая кейс 1win пришла к выводу: главный актив современного гемблинг-бренда — уже не только рекламный бюджет. Пока одни покупают трафик, другие создают собс…
🔥4
🔵ShortsNinja — faceless видео в 2 клика Тул генерит короткие ролики с нуля: пишет сценарий, создает озвучку, подбирает визуал и публикует видео в соцсетях. ㅤ —> Что умеет: ㅤ • Создает faceless-видео. • Генерирует сценарии. • Добавляет озвучку и музыку. • Создает ИИ-изображения и видео. • Автоматически публикует ролики. • Поддерживает YouTube Shorts, TikTok и Reels. ㅤ Сервис закрывает весь цикл производства коротких …
👎5👍2❤1🔥1
Что льют с нативок (фото 1) Гео Испания. Сеть МГИД. Языки: испанский, русский. 1. «Болят суставы?» фото 2. Студент обнаружил формулу, которая убирает боль за 21 день. Hondrodin. ссылка. 2. «Только 15 минут в день чтобы заработать 5600 евро». фото 3. «Сотрудница банка рассказала как она из 250 евро сделала 2 500 000 благодаря искусственному интеллекту» AI App. ссылка. 3. «Вот так вы можете зарабатывать 370 евро в …
🤔3
Кто еще может заработать на OnlyFans? Неожиданно, но специалисты по оптимизации налогов. Да-да, богатых и успешных блогерш присутствуют хорошие заработки и они тоже заинтересованы в оптимизации налогов. Как известно во многих странах старой Европы достаточно высокие налоги, в некоторых странах достигают 60%. И вот оптимизаторы нашли способ заработать на богатых и фигуристах моделях. Для справки: По данным на нача…
🤔5❤2
Tiktok > Search arbitrage Как известно, залог хорошего стр и дешевых переходов с тикток (платный) это злободневная тема для пользователей. То есть, человек, находящийся в поиске работы, с высокой вероятностью перейдет по ссылке в виде, где говорится что можно устроиться на высокооплачиваемую работу, но по факту рекламодателям на дорогие клики переливают неплатежеспособный трафик. Но это уже другая история. Нескольк…
❤4👍3👏1
🟢FineVoice — генерация и изменение голоса FineVoice — сервис для создания и изменения голосов с помощью ИИ. —> Что умеет: • Генерирует голос по тексту. • Меняет голос в аудио. • Поддерживает разные стили речи. • Подходит для контента и озвучки. Инструмент можно использовать для озвучки видео, стримов и проектов. ⚪Попробовать: здесь
🔥5
Почему витрина? Линк. Почему выгодно лить трафик на новостные витрины (Взгляд аффилиат-медиа, без розовых очков). Новостные витрины — один из самых недооценённых, но при этом стабильно прибыльных форматов в аффилиат-маркетинге. Пока большинство продолжает биться лбами за прямые лендинги и «идеальный оффер», витрины спокойно зарабатывают на масштабе, доверии и гибкости. Разберёмся по существу — почему это реально…
👍3👏2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kris_traff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @kris_traff as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 months
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aff_job · 17,0901 postНИЩИЙ АРБИТРАЖНИК
@ARBI_TRAFFIC · 11,1971 postSCAM Лента | Чёрный список арбитража трафика
@black_list_traffic · 12,1771 postCPA HUNTER | Вакансии арбитража трафика
@hr_affiliate · 35,5901 postiGaming Hunter | Вакансии из Gambling, Betting и Crypto сферы
@igaming_hunter · 12,8011 postВакансии для медиабайеров | TRAFF BASE
@traff_base · 10,6121 postКРЕО Лента | Креативы для арбитража трафика
@traff_creo · 11,2751 postУБТ вакансии | База УБТшников
@ubt_base · 10,5411 postAFFILIATE WORK | Вакансии и работа в арбитраже трафика
@works_affiliate · 13,7141 postCPA WORK | Вакансии арбитража трафика
@works_cpa · 21,0691 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@works_cpa · 21,069
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кристина Кон | Арбитраж трафика” (@kris_traff), 11,081 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kris_traff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.