Circle отчиталась за II квартал: выручка не оправдала ожиданий Circle сообщила о выручке в $701 млн, что оказалось ниже прогноза аналитиков ($734,7 млн). Основной доход от резервов замедлился из-за снижения процентных ставок. Компания вернулась к прибыли, заработав $48 млн, однако объем USDC в обращении снизился почти на 7% с марта - до $71,8 млрд. На этом фоне Morgan Stanley понизил рейтинг акций Circle до Underwe…
Views per post sit far above this size band
4,330 average views per post against 1,226 subscribers — an engagement rate of 353.3%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 69,310 |
| Mature posts only | 371.4% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,226 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:rus · 54,164 channels · p10 5.33% · p25 10.5% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.6% · p90 57.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.834th percentile · 17.6× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.236% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
