Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДНК: Детективно-Научный Криминалист👩‍🔬👩‍✈️

Channel

ДНК: Детективно-Научный Криминалист👩‍🔬👩‍✈️

@krim_extrim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003124303643
TypeChannel
Username@krim_extrim
DescriptionПогружаемся в мир криминалистики и ДНК:от разбора статей в Nature до ошибок в "Менталисте".
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 6 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/krim_extrim

Growth

237 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:4823no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:2923first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 6 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
51s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1123.4%
😁1123.4%
🔥817.0%
👍48.51%
👀36.38%
🤩36.38%
🍓24.26%
🙈24.26%
👏12.13%
😐12.13%
🤔12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 29 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Oct 2025, 09:31 UTC167 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

С вашими запросами придется переквалифицироваться в сексолога 😁 (а я могу)

😁3🍓2🔥2🤔1😐1

29 Oct 2025, 09:23 UTC158 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Раннее облысение, тестостерон и либидо: что говорит наука? Подруга просит разобрать вопрос)) Её предположение, основанное на опыте - никакой связи нет) Спойлер - конечно нет. Продолжаем нежно любить Джейсона Момоа, Брэда Питта, Криса Хемсворта и других волосатиков😁 Часто можно услышать расхожее мнение: «Лысеешь — значит, половой гормон бушует». Это утверждение стало почти народной мудростью, но насколько оно соотве

🔥3🤩32

7 Oct 2025, 13:14 UTC272 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Синдром Буратино: Почему мы верим в самые нелепые анатомические мифы🍌 На просторах интернета я снова наткнулась на эту жемчужину народной мудрости. Яркая картинка, убедительная стрелочка, ведущая от густой брови вниз, и многозначительный подтекст: «Природа не обманывает!». Периодически этот миф всплывает в новых обличьях: то в виде размера ноги, то длины большого пальца, а теперь вот и брови подключили. Что ж, дава

😁52🙈2

6 Oct 2025, 09:05 UTC177 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @moscowmapPhoto

😱😱 Кожное сало, пот, слои отмершей кожи: из этого москвичка делает свои работы Художница Даша собирает всё, что живёт на человеке и вокруг него, включая микробы и бактерии, и превращает в образы. Странно и живо, иногда пугающе, но оторваться сложно. Подробнее смотрите на видео

👀3😁31

6 Oct 2025, 04:00 UTC152 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сериалы, где ДНК — центральная тема сюжета (научная фантастика/триллер) 1. «Одни из нас» (The Last of Us) · Почему тут ДНК: В основе апокалипсиса лежит грибок кордицепс, который меняет своих жертв на генетическом уровне. Иммунитет Элли, вероятно, тоже связан с уникальными особенностями ее ДНК. 2. «Сотня» (The 100) · Почему тут ДНК: На протяжении сезонов поднимаются темы генной инженерии, мутаций и искусственно

3👍2

6 Oct 2025, 03:56 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сериалы, где ДНК — часть рабочего процесса (упоминается часто) · «Улики» (CSI: Crime Scene Investigation) и все его ответвления (CSI: Miami, CSI: NY) — это классика жанра. Именно этот сериал популяризировал работу криминалистов, и ДНК-анализ здесь один из главных «звезд». · «Закон и порядок» (Law & Order) и его многочисленные сезоны/спиноффы — детективы и прокуроры постоянно опираются на вещественные доказательства,

2👍1🔥1

6 Oct 2025, 03:52 UTC111 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сериалы, где ДНК — главный инструмент (или даже «герой») 1. «Следствие по телу» (Cold Case) · Почему тут ДНК: Идеальный пример! Команда расследует старые, «холодные» дела. Часто именно появление современных методов ДНК-анализа (которых не было на момент преступления) позволяет пересмотреть улики и найти убийцу спустя годы. 2. «Мыслить как преступник» (Criminal Minds) · Почему тут ДНК: Профилеры BAU постоянно р

🔥21👍1👏1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @krim_extrim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДНК: Детективно-Научный Криминалист👩‍🔬👩‍✈️” (@krim_extrim), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krim_extrim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.