Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

1000 zašto - 1000 zato

@kresimir_matic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,001subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395720663
TypeChannel
Username@kresimir_matic
Created14 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kresimir_matic

Growth

5,0015,0215,0116 August 2026 — 5,021 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,021 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,020 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,013 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,010 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,001 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,998–5,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:125,001-9
12 Aug 2026, 08:265,010-3
9 Aug 2026, 11:525,013-7
6 Aug 2026, 18:005,020-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:345,021no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:565,021first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 5,001 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,780
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held21 (6 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total5,332
Reactions total156
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

919 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66572.4%
👍18119.7%
👏505.44%
🔥101.09%
🙏70.762%
😍30.326%
🕊20.218%
🤝10.109%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 919reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC782 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Clarity akt potvrđen datum 🔥 NOVI ČLANAK JE OBJAVLJEN! Od 15. Septembra nadalje CLARITY Act ulazi u ključni prozor senatskog odlučivanja. Što to može značiti za XRP, ISO 20022 coine, tokenizaciju i novi globalni financijski sustav? 🔥 Slagalica se otvara komad po komad — a ovo bi mogao biti jedan od najvećih komada do sada. Cijelu NFS analizu pročitajte ovdje: https://izvansistema.com/article.php/127/clarity-act-od

👍25👏5

26 Jul 2026, 01:36 UTC≈1,990 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ne gradim chatbot. Gradim operativnog AI asistenta koji istražuje, analizira, povezuje informacije, prati zadatke i priprema odluke. Njegovo ime je VIKTOR. Uskoro ćete vidjeti što zapravo može. 🔥

38🔥10👍8

22 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC≈2,560 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Danas Trump ima novu objavu Mi smo analizirali ono što većina nije ni pogledala. Donald Trump objavio je novu poruku o Iranu i Hormuškom tjesnacu. Većina ljudi pročitala je sadržaj, procijenila političku poruku i nastavila dalje. Mi smo krenuli drugim putem. Nismo analizirali samo tekst. Provjerili smo: • originalni status ID • točno vrijeme nastanka objave • sekundu objave • broj riječi, slova i znakova • m

57👍13

3 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC≈3,290 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

FINANCIJSKI SWITCH JE POČEO. Ne kao jedan veliki događaj i ne kao jedan datum nakon kojeg će se sve odjednom promijeniti, nego kroz proces koji je već krenuo unutar financijske infrastrukture. Tokenizirana imovina prelazi iz testiranja u produkciju, institucionalna poravnanja postaju stvarna, a različite mreže počinju dobivati jasne i međusobno odvojene uloge. Zato nekoliko dana nisam ništa objavljivao. Vijesti je

👍4918

15 Jun 2026, 20:52 UTC≈3,820 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ako vlastiti novac ne možeš koristiti bez limita, aplikacije, provjere, autorizacije i dopuštenja sustava — gdje je onda stvarna granica vlasništva? Tema gotovine, banaka, digitalnog novca i financijske slobode više nije teorija. To je već svakodnevni život običnog čovjeka. Pročitaj članak ovdje: https://izvansistema.com/article.php/109/kad-tvoj-novac-stoji-u-banci-da-li-stvarno-tvoj

👍277👏2

10 Jun 2026, 08:11 UTC≈4,240 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Kada novac dođe Danas sam javno objavio knjigu “Kada novac dođe”. Ovo nije knjiga o brzoj zaradi i nije klasični financijski priručnik. Više je knjiga o čovjeku. O tome kako ostati miran, priseban i odgovoran kada se život stvarno počne mijenjati. Jer jedno je pričati o promjeni, učiti i pripremati se, a nešto sasvim drugo je znati što napraviti kada se otvore nove mogućnosti, kada dođe više novca, više izbora, a

52👍2

8 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,720 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Kad banka koristi tvoj novac i na njemu zarađuje, to je normalan posao. Kad običan čovjek želi da i njegov novac radi za njega, odjednom se kaže da je to “opasno” i da ga treba zaštititi. Ali od čega ga zapravo štite? Od mogućnosti da i on dobije dio onoga što velike firme, fondovi i banke već godinama koriste? Ovo nije komplicirana financijska tema. Ovo je pitanje zdravog razuma. Napisao sam članak jednostavnim

39

7 Jun 2026, 20:18 UTC≈2,940 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Nećete više znati što je istina, a što laž Novi članak je vani. Tema je BRICS, dolar, Trumpove prijetnje carinama i sve veći informacijski kaos oko novca. Ali poanta nije u tome da je BRICS sutra srušio dolar, jer nije. Poanta je u tome da se financijski sustav mijenja, a javnosti se sve češće serviraju simboli, poluistine, dramatični naslovi i narativi koji ljude više zbunjuju nego informiraju. Zato je važno zna

28👍13

31 May 2026, 17:31 UTC≈3,160 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Poklanjam vam novu besplatnu publikaciju: Prije nego novac dođe Ovo je uvod u temu koju smatram izuzetno važnom: što napraviti prije nego veći novac stvarno dođe u život čovjeka. Jer novac sam po sebi ne rješava sve. Ako čovjek nema mir, plan, sigurnost, privatnost i granice, veći novac može otvoriti jednako puno problema koliko i mogućnosti. Ova publikacija je prvi korak. Uskoro dolazi i puna knjiga: "Kada novac

56

23 May 2026, 10:41 UTC≈3,790 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Materijal koji je prvotno bio zamišljen kao Zoom predavanje odlučio sam pretvoriti u publikaciju. Zašto? Zato što mnogim ljudima danas više treba miran tekst koji mogu pročitati svojim tempom, vratiti se na njega, označiti ono što im je važno i polako povezati pojmove, nego još jedan Zoom koji prođe i nestane. Publikacija se zove: NOVAC MIJENJA OBLIK Vodič za mirno razumijevanje promjene financijskog sustava Napis

75

22 May 2026, 19:08 UTC≈2,990 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔥 Nova Vijest dana je na portalu Europske banke upravo ulaze puno ozbiljnije u stablecoin utrku. Projekt Qivalis dobio je još 25 banaka, što znači da sada iza njega stoji ukupno 37 financijskih institucija iz 15 zemalja. Cilj je jasan: stvoriti regulirani euro stablecoin i odgovoriti na dominaciju dolarskih stablecoina. Ovo više nije priča o “crypto svijetu sa strane”. Ovo je signal da se stari bankarski sustav p

32👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @kresimir_matic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 930,962 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1000 zašto - 1000 zato” (@kresimir_matic), 5,001 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kresimir_matic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.