Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Krautzone

Channel

Krautzone

@krautzone

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

9,474subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001255843528
TypeChannel
Username@krautzone
Created27 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/krautzone

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,4749,5899,531.56 August 2026 — 9,589 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,588 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,578 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,570 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,564 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,553 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,556 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,546 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,534 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,529 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,518 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,499 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,474 subscribers6 August 202628 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 53 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,457–9,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 14:189,474-25
18 Sept 2026, 14:169,499-19
13 Sept 2026, 21:429,518-11
10 Sept 2026, 06:579,529-5
5 Sept 2026, 06:029,534-12
1 Sept 2026, 20:269,546-10
29 Aug 2026, 15:269,556+3
23 Aug 2026, 15:179,553-11
20 Aug 2026, 00:479,564-6
12 Aug 2026, 16:049,570-8
9 Aug 2026, 09:539,578-10
6 Aug 2026, 14:079,588-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:329,589first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,241 reactions across 59 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,04246.5%
🔥39917.8%
🤮30513.6%
🤣2018.97%
🤬1777.90%
😢773.44%
👎401.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC993 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📌 Für alle progressiven Tablettleser, überzeugten Regenwaldschützer oder Bewohner von 4 qm-WGs in Berlin: Die Krautzone gibt es natürlich auch als Digitalabo als klassische PDF oder im angenehmen E-Paper-Format zum "blättern" am Rechner. ❗️Auch Digitalabonnenten erhalten eine Neuabo-Prämie. Hier bestellen: https://kraut-zone.de/laden/produkt/elektronisches-abo-pdf/

👍14

28 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,100 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026

➕Plus-Artikel Krautzone-Chefredakteur Florian Müller meint: Liberalkonservative Journalisten wie Ulf Poschardt stilisieren sich erst zu Rebellen, wenn ihre Systemkritik längst im Mainstream angekommen ist. So sichern sie sich die fortlaufende Finanzierung durch eben jenen Kulturbetrieb. Im Gegensatz zu solchen „Küchentisch-Revolutionären“ hat das alternative Vorfeld die existenzielle Krise des Landes weitaus früher e…

👍43🔥4🤮2

27 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,460 views53 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

☠️Gegenüber DDR-Funktionären darf keine Milde an den Tag gelegt werden... ✏️ Zur Kolumne https://kraut-zone.de/blog/2026/08/27/was-uns-die-ddr-lehrt/ 🗞 Die Krautzone gibt es gedruckt https://kraut-zone.de/laden/abos/

👍53

27 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,490 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Medien prägen unsere Wahrnehmung der Umwelt. Dabei kommt es zwangsläufig zu einer Verzerrung der Realität, die selten zufällig ist. Vielmehr handelt es sich um gezielte Manipulation, etwa durch selektive Berichterstattung, Framing oder das Unterdrücken unbequemer Fakten ... 📚 Beim Verlag bestellen: https://kraut-zone.de/laden/produkt/propaganda-wie-linke-dich-taeglich-manipulieren/ ➕ Bei Amazon: https://www.amazon.…

👍21

27 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,450 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026

➕Plus-Artikel Werner Bräuninger rechnet schonungslos mit Instagram ab und entlarvt die Plattform als zerstörerische Schleudermaschine für linken Hass und systematische Spaltung. Sein Fazit: Nur eine souveräne Jugend, die offensiv dagegenhält, kann dem Verfall Einhalt gebieten. Hier lesen: https://kraut-zone.de/blog/2026/08/27/die-echokammer-des-verfalls-abgruende-auf-instagram/ Hier zum Plus-Abonnement: https://kra…

👍21

27 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,850 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ine aktuelle Umfrage des INSA-Instituts hat ergeben, dass Muslime vor allem linke Parteien wählen wollen. Die SPD steht unter Anhängern des Islams bei 26 Prozent, die Linke bei 23 Prozent und die CDU bei 22 Prozent. AfD und Grüne schneiden deutlich schlechter ab. Im direkten Vergleich mit allen Wählern der BRD zeigt sich, wie stark sich diese muslimische Gemeinschaft von den Deutschen unterscheidet. Linke und SPD st…

🔥31🤬14🤮9👍1🤣1

26 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,610 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

➕Plus-Artikel Fridericus Vesargo meint, dass Christopher Nolans ambitionierte Verfilmung der „Odyssee“ durch eine unausgegorene Amerikanisierung und historisch absurde Logiklöcher baden geht. Statt antiker Pracht liefert der Regisseur nur ein prätentiöses Werk, das den zeitlosen Mythos opfert. Hier lesen: https://kraut-zone.de/blog/2026/08/26/schiffbruch-mit-ansage-wie-christopher-nolan-die-antike-amerikanisiert/ H…

🤬21👍5

26 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,840 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

👮🏻‍♀️Der sich abzeichnende Erfolg der AfD spaltet die Polizei... ✏️ Zum Netzartikel https://kraut-zone.de/blog/2026/08/25/spaltet-ein-afd-sieg-die-polizei/ 🗞 Die Krautzone gibt es gedruckt https://kraut-zone.de/laden/abos/

👍27🔥9

25 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,810 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

☠️Shlomo meint: Brechtkens Kritik an der Medienarbeit eines AFD-nahen Streamers folgt einem Kalkül... ✏️ Zur Kolumne https://kraut-zone.de/blog/2026/08/25/benedikt-brechtken-und-das-deutsche-minenfeld/ 🗞 Die Krautzone gibt es gedruckt https://kraut-zone.de/laden/abos/

👍23👎8🔥7🤣2

25 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,840 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026

➕Plus-Artikel Die Schweizer Neutralität dient als flexibles Instrument für einen Kleinstaat, um eigene Interessen durch geschickte Anpassung und Eigennutz zu wahren. Die Ablehnung einer entsprechenden Neutralitätsinitiative würde der Staatsführung in einer veränderten Welt einerseits Handlungsspielraum geben, aber andererseits ein fatales Signal der Unterwerfung an EU und NATO senden. Hier lesen: https://kraut-zone.…

👍19

25 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈2,000 views35 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Am 10. Oktober findet ein Seminartag des "Deutschen Akademikerverbandes" statt. Mehr Informationen unter: https://dakadv.de/ Anmeldung über [email protected]

👍35

24 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,120 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚧Die CDU wird in Sachsen-Anhalt verlieren, weil sie gar nicht gewinnen WILL... ✏️ Zur Kolumne https://kraut-zone.de/blog/2026/08/24/die-zerstoerung-der-cdu/ 🗞 Die Krautzone gibt es gedruckt https://kraut-zone.de/laden/abos/

👍45

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @krautzone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

achse:ostwest
@achseostwest · 26,381
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Björn Höcke
@BjoernHoeckeAfD · 49,168
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
🔵 Martin Sellner [TELEGRAMELITE]
@martinsellnerIB · 72,056
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
Naomi Seibt
@naomiseibt · 24,014
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q124362630 on Wikidata, read 27 September 2026
LabelKrautzone
DescriptionGerman magazine
X / Twitter@KraZMagazin
YouTubeUC5gzI18X1nUgpzd5DzCbspg
Official sitehttps://kraut-zone.de/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Krautzone” (@krautzone), 9,474 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krautzone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.