Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КрасОпера

@krasopera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,038subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001607526669
TypeChannel
Username@krasopera
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krasopera

Growth

3,0383,0393,038.56 August 2026 — 3,039 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,039 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,038 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,038–3,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:113,038-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:413,039no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:183,039first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 3,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held4 (10 March 202615 July 2026)
Views total557
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8374.1%
👍108.93%
🔥76.25%
🎉54.46%
👎32.68%
👏32.68%
😍10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 04:50 UTC557 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Куда сходить бесплатно – знают Пушкин и MAX Легкое напоминание для молодежи — в мессенджере MAX есть чат-бот «Пушкинская карта» https://max.ru/pushkincard_bot. Там можно посмотреть какие культурные события проходят рядом с вами, а еще получать каждую неделю новые персональные рекомендации. Бот можно найти через поиск в мессенджере или зайти через «Сферум» → Сервисы → «Пушкинская карта»

5👎3

19 Jun 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,060 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как выглядел Андрей Поздеев и его картины – знают многие. А как звучал его голос? В мультимедийном проекте Сибирского федерального университета к 100-летию художника столько интерактива и красок, что хочется листать эти страницы снова и снова. А навигация по сайту через цветы – отдельный вид эстетического удовольствия. Что внутри: голос художника, десятки стилей, в которых он работал, редкие факты и ответ на вопрос

13👍6

19 Mar 2026, 07:46 UTC≈2,100 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mypes_krskVideo

У нас вчера с коллегами был культурный выход! Театр Оперы и Балета пригласил нас на оперу «Севильский цирюльник»! Для нас это стало целым событием, так как ранее командой мы никуда не выходили. Такое вот приятное завершение рабочего дня! Театр в этот вечер собрал несколько зоозащитных организаций! Рады были видеть представителей других приютов. Со многими нас связывает дружба♥️ От всего сердца благодарим организат

31🎉5👍4

10 Mar 2026, 05:43 UTC≈2,790 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

8 марта в театре царил Моцарт! В рамках фестиваля «Парад звёзд в оперном. Словцов» на нашей сцене прошёл концерт Viva Mozart. На сцене блистали не только ведущие солисты нашей оперной труппы, но и звёздные гости: солистка Большого театра Анна Аглатова и маэстро Михаил Татарников, главный дирижёр НОВАТа. ✨ Смотрите фотографии, делитесь впечатлениями и приходите на следующий концерт «Парада звёзд» – юбилейный вечер н

34🔥7👏3😍1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @krasopera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,170 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КрасОпера” (@krasopera), 3,038 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krasopera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.