Потом еще поехать на афтыч в рестик за мой счет 💅👑👍🫡🤝👻🕺👏🤩
💯18🤝9❤7🤪2❤🔥1🤣1

Channel
@kramskoyyyy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,215subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001714388257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kramskoyyyy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kramskoyyyy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 1,215 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:12 | 1,216 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:31 | 1,216 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
755 reactions across 15 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 275 | 36.4% | |
| 🤣 | 137 | 18.1% | |
| 💯 | 88 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 76 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 5.70% | |
| 🤡 | 38 | 5.03% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 2.78% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 2.78% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 1.85% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 1.19% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 0.795% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.662% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.397% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.397% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.265% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.265% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.265% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.265% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.132% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.397% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 755 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kramskoyyyy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Потом еще поехать на афтыч в рестик за мой счет 💅👑👍🫡🤝👻🕺👏🤩
💯18🤝9❤7🤪2❤🔥1🤣1
Последние новости: 1. Мы сняли LIVE в заброшенной усадьбе и это получилось просто ахуенно. Потратили огромное количество денег и ни капельки не жалеем, посмотреть можно тут. 2. Вместе с Максом Лутчаком сделали саундтрек к новому фильму "Смешарики. Сквозь вселенные". Это как бы нихуя себе чекпоинт, прикоснуться к этой вселенной, прям горжусь! Песня получилось ахуенной и прямо сейчас входит в топ-50 самых популярных …
❤31🔥15👏8💘1
Дай бог 🙏
❤25💯7🤣7
Загадка человечества № 1: Почему сонграйтеры, считающие себя невъебенными авторами, имеющие амбиции артиста, не могут написать себе норм песню?
🤣24❤13👎2🔥1
Нет ощущения, что становится все скучнее и скучнее? Если раньше хоть кто-то заморачивался над чем-нибудь, то сейчас все играют в лотерею на зелетевший рилс. ИИ-артисты и треки. Почти не осталось креативного промо. Никаких крупных форм, даже сниппеты с норм продакшеном уходят, оставляя только домашние или прогулочные видосы. Кажется, приходит время манифестов, либо реально умрем от простоты и скуки.
💯49❤22👍11👏2💔1🕊1
Posted without readable text
🤣7❤1👍1🔥1
Posted without readable text
💩4❤1👏1🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤2👍2💩2🔥2
Состав сериала утвержден. Съемки начались. Ждите!
❤29👏4
Если помните, в прошлом году вышел док сериал Кирилла Алехина "Громко и честно", к которому я имею прямое отношение. Оло, у меня даже карточка на Кинопоиске есть, ахахаха! Я вам не хуй с горы! 5 серий. 5 героев. 5 историй. Все это про независимую музыку и людей, которые ее создают. В этом году будет новый сезон. Кого хотели бы в нем увидеть? Лайнап еще собран не до конца, так что, возможно, прислушаемся.
❤39🔥11👏7❤🔥2👍1
Знали бы некоторые артисты, сколько они НЕ зарабатывают денег из-за того, что их менеджмент просто клал на них хуй. Вот я переодически подкидываю некоторым ребятам работку в виде выступлений, а в ответ получаю недели ожидания ответов на разных стадиях переговоров. Причем это не случайность, — это постоянная закономерность с одними и теми же людьми. При том, что это не группы с плотнейшими графиками, их даже просто п…
❤46🔥9👏6💯3👍2😁2💔1
Что больше переоценено: секс или позиционирование?
🤣29🤔12💯5🔥2🤯2🍓1😐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kramskoyyyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крамской, работай!” (@kramskoyyyy), 1,215 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kramskoyyyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.