Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

KRAKEN 18+

@krakenFOX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,645subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595584654
TypeChannel
Username@krakenFOX
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krakenFOX

Growth

1,6421,6451,643.56 August 2026 — 1,642 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,642 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,643 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,642–1,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:281,645+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:441,643+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:481,642no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:481,642first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.9%
avg views ÷ 1,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total18,404
Reactions total1,760
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,500 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,27350.9%
❤‍🔥34113.6%
🔥28111.2%
custom 51953928315307681581375.48%
custom 51949033813526798261275.08%
custom 51951565610848443981265.04%
🍓813.24%
🍌441.76%
custom 5194940893597044241431.72%
custom 5195141601713754679200.8%
custom 5195382295975989073140.56%
custom 5195452501511413613130.52%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,500reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krakenFOX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC875 views164 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

«В нашей безвестности мы обнаруживаем, что живём на незначительной планете захудалой звезды, затерянной в галактике, в каком-то забытом уголке Вселенной, в которой галактик гораздо больше, чем людей» Карл Саган @Schneeleopard ✨

121custom 519490338135267982626custom 519538229597598907311custom 51953928315307681584🍌1custom 51949408935970442411

31 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC910 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elisa_windPhoto

Artfight attack for KraKENsona

63custom 519515656108484439813🍌3

31 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC834 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё немного репостов!

20🍌1

31 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC855 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kitoriyukoPhoto

четвёртая атака на Кракена 🤩

47custom 51951565610848443989🍌3

31 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,130 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Revenge 6/13 ⚔️, к сожалению последний Для @grimdarkedd /сайт артфайта снова не выдержал величие работы, тыкните в личку :"

custom 519515656108484439881custom 51949033813526798262614❤‍🔥3🍌1custom 51949408935970442411

30 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,210 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто успел - тот успел)

83❤‍🔥27🔥7custom 51953928315307681583🍌1

29 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,050 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✦ ГАЧА на 10 персонажей (11 и 12 выкупили на этапе рисовки :") ✦ Важно: персонажи выдаются в порядке очереди. Как это происходит? Вы в комментариях отмечаетесь "беру", далее пишите мне в лс (@kraKENsona). Как подходит ваша очередь я скидываю номер для оплаты, после вы получаете рандомного/выбираете персонажа. Далее я отвечаю следующему человеку Важно 2: на оплату персонажа у вас есть 20 минут. Пожалуйста, не задержи

custom 51949033813526798263511🍌5

28 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,290 views190 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Revenge 5/13 ⚔️ У нее там тоже активный ревендж, судя по всему 🩸 Для @nelmenku /сайт артфайта не выдержал размер файла, тыкните меня в лс

124❤‍🔥42🍓18custom 51951565610848443984🍌1custom 51953928315307681581

25 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,420 views184 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Очень большой и тяжелый заказ, я выдохлась..Надеюсь тут нет каких либо спорных символов, но на всякий случай заблюрю

🔥11241❤‍🔥20custom 51949033813526798265custom 51953928315307681585🍌1

20 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,900 views137 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Revenge 4/9 ⚔️ for nanasiks

95❤‍🔥28🍓10🍌1custom 51949033813526798261custom 51949408935970442411custom 51953822959759890731

18 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,810 views137 reactions16 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дополнительные стикеры к паку 🐹

92custom 519494089359704424124custom 519515656108484439815🍌3custom 51953928315307681582🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,840 views165 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Revenge 3/9 ⚔️ @r_briller

123🔥27❤‍🔥11🍌2custom 51951416017137546791custom 51951565610848443981

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @krakenFOX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 124,865 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KRAKEN 18+” (@krakenFOX), 1,645 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krakenFOX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.