Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сергей Ванинский. Минск. Уч 29 Кошевого.

@krainaya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001475462331
TypeChannel
Username@krainaya
DescriptionПредлагаю строить диалог с теми, кто поддерживает старую власть. Также обсуждаем вопросы беларусской телепропаганды. Канал на YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQSJ7IuYWI2GgIA67P_ltjg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/krainaya

Growth

196 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:4719no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:3319first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Videos
29
Links
208

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
3m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

15 Dec 2025, 22:03 UTC31 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqD5ub4qT_A

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

16 Oct 2025, 14:36 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/KoFq6J8MBAY?si=wSo2yWOgbsfBqfmG

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

8 Aug 2025, 06:58 UTC64 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/fM5KOiZMxPc?si=e6Ya3qeNDD34lUvl

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

6 Aug 2025, 11:59 UTC59 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/fLWerWZwfLs?si=bATMzEowNtfsK6Tm

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

1 May 2025, 05:58 UTC75 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/dUjNKY2HWgc?si=BodOTyyfI5K3UeRJ

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

28 Jan 2025, 08:13 UTC106 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/X4fGeSwpFOk?si=ik7nAvxzTWvIJoTL

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

24 Nov 2024, 07:50 UTC116 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/7PxsLaiIiNA?si=atVqjH5tqkTiNVbZ

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

9 Nov 2024, 07:12 UTC130 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/KGtoBFeZzkg?si=OoWcnzzB96e278bH

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

24 Oct 2024, 05:37 UTC131 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/FolutkgQZMo?si=Tg2VzuGEuJebPMuW

Signed Sergey V

8 Sept 2024, 04:08 UTC171 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/53HQdbBa1hM?si=I93l8yoEd84dGJP0

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

7 Jul 2024, 07:23 UTC208 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/NOy3_8yUeGg?si=QNs4XM0HtCGvWA1Q

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

31 May 2024, 09:33 UTC199 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://youtu.be/zy0fNNVk-kc?si=kn573XGMT4QTIBQI

Signed Sergey Vaninsky

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @krainaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Apr 2024, 06:42 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

Якая з гіпотэз аб каранёвай прычыне дыктатуры ЧіС у Беларусі здаецца табе найбольш праўдападобнай?

  1. 17. Для пераважнай большасці беларусаў "главное, чтобы не было войны и не мешали работать".12%
  2. 18. Талерантнасць беларусаў да гвалту.4%
  3. 19. Пропасць паміж беднымі і багатымі.4%
  4. 20. НЕ оптимальное понимание/осознание себя как самого важного существа.8%
  5. 21. Чудовищная межпоколенческая коллективная травма нашего народа.8%
  6. 22. Пераважная большасць беларусаў не разумеюць, што такое свабода.20%
  7. 23. П-ая большасць беларусаў не ведае, ў чым каранёвая прычына дыктатуры і не спрабуе высветліць яе.20%
  8. 24. Её взращивает сам народ.16%
  9. У гэтым спісе ўсё не тое. Але ёсць годныя гіпотэзы ў іншым спісе.4%
  10. Ні ў адным спісе няма годных гіпотэз. Патрэбен дадатковы спіс!4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Apr 2024, 06:42 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Якая з гіпотэз аб каранёвай прычыне дыктатуры ЧіС у Беларусі здаецца табе найбольш праўдападобнай?

  1. 09. Нам вельмі не пашанцавала з суседам.4%
  2. 10. Низкий уровень политической культуры.21%
  3. 11. Легче не брать ответственность, а плыть.7%
  4. 12. Людзі не цікавяцца нічым, а чакаюць што ім гэта другія абязаны ўсе зрабіць.11%
  5. 13. Долгий советский опыт и чужие войны, проходившие на нашей территории.32%
  6. 14. Штыкі.0%
  7. 15. Недостаточный уровень образованности граждан.14%
  8. 16. Люди в обществе слишком сильно сконцентрированы на личностных стремлениях.0%
  9. У гэтым спісе ўсё не тое. Але ёсць годныя гіпотэзы ў іншым спісе.7%
  10. Ні ў адным спісе няма годных гіпотэз. Патрэбен дадатковы спіс!4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Apr 2024, 06:41 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Якая з гіпотэз аб каранёвай прычыне дыктатуры ЧіС у Беларусі здаецца табе найбольш праўдападобнай?

  1. 01. У пераважнай большасці беларусаў вывучаная бездапаможнасць.28%
  2. 02. Пераважная большасць беларусаў не лічаць сябе найважнейшымі людзьмі ў сваім уласным жыцці.7%
  3. 03. Іррацыйны страх.3%
  4. 04. Рабы навучаюць рабоў быць рабамі.24%
  5. 05. В самом человеке, оказавшемся на месте президента.14%
  6. 06. Пропаганда того, что мнение чиновников — это истина в последней инстанции.3%
  7. 07. Неумение беларусов объединяться.3%
  8. 08. Достаточно легкомысленное отношение к закону.0%
  9. У гэтым спісе ўсё не тое. Але ёсць годныя гіпотэзы ў іншым спісе.10%
  10. Ні ў адным спісе няма годных гіпотэз. Патрэбен дадатковы спіс!7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2024, 18:27 UTCFinal Results449 voters

Хто найважнейшы чалавек у тваім жыцці? Так, толькі адзін. Апытанне 2024 года.

  1. партнёр па жыцці (муж або жонка або мой хлопец або мая дзяўчына)15%
  2. тата або мама10%
  3. сын або дачка18%
  4. адзін іншы чалавек не з гэтага спісу2%
  5. не магу выбраць! Гэта *я* і некалькі іншых людзей. Аднолькава важных!17%
  6. не магу выбраць! Гэта некалькі іншых людзей. Аднолькава важных! *Я* не ў спісе.8%
  7. я24%
  8. няма такога чалавека2%
  9. не магу адказаць, таму што не хапае інфармацыі ў пытанні.2%
  10. я не ведаю2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2024 to 15 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 910,297 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сергей Ванинский. Минск. Уч 29 Кошевого.” (@krainaya), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krainaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.