Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kopfkino

Channel

kopfkino

@kpfkino

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,599subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001679285444
TypeChannel
Username@kpfkino
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kpfkino

Growth

5,5735,5995,5867 August 2026 — 5,574 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,574 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,573 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,599 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,569–5,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:065,599+26
10 Aug 2026, 14:125,573-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:305,574no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:295,574first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 5,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (8 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total5,829
Reactions total282
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,043 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48046.0%
🔥12411.9%
👍868.25%
😁666.33%
🎉524.99%
custom 5458587405227410252494.70%
custom 5458530728838978333434.12%
custom 5332287939063852357413.93%
312.97%
❤‍🔥272.59%
💯242.30%
😱80.767%
🥰60.575%
😍40.384%
custom 545844735493382380320.192%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,043reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kpfkino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC679 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2417👍5🥰3

Signed Karin

4 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,180 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пост для тех, кто любит этимологические расследования Чем дольше изучаю язык, тем чаще меня осеняют внезапные идеи в духе «а не проверить ли, что общего у …». На этот раз мой выбор пал на английское first («первый») и немецкое Fürst («князь»). Рассказываю ниже⤵️ ⭐️Ответ нашелся практически сразу: оба берут свое начало в прагерманском корне *furista-, который, похоже, претерпел небольшие изменения. ⭐️Так, в древнев

36🔥16👍6custom 53322879390638523574

Signed Karin

28 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,670 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Когда учишь немецкий, но английский все равно упрямо лезет в голову. Скажите, ну было же?

😁51custom 545853072883897833316💯104

Signed Karin

21 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,300 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На карте Германии мной был случайно обнаружен груминг-салон под названием Pudelwohl. Неужели сюда водят только пуделей? Разумеется, нет. За нехитрым неймингом прячется небольшая история. Известно, что пудели когда-то были выведены для охоты на воде. Эти четвероногие очень любят воду, поэтому свое название получили неспроста: от глагола pudeln (puddeln), который означает «плескаться, барахтаться в воде». Отсюда и во

5617custom 545858740522741025216👍1

Signed Karin

14 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,200 views181 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У меня сегодня день рождения И я хочу кое-что сказать: здесь меня читают более пяти тысяч человек, а ведь четыре года назад было всего тридцать. Но знаете, что я для себя поняла? Что внутри ничего не поменялось. С тем же увлечением, с тем же рвением я пишу обо всем немецком и продолжаю вкладывать частичку себя и своей души в каждый текст. А ей кривить, скажу честно, совсем не хочется. Загадываю не поступаться собо

98🎉52custom 533228793906385235722👍3🥰3❤‍🔥1🔥1😍1

Signed Karin

8 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,790 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Еще в июне в рамках любимого Beat Film Festival посмотрела «Боуи: последняя глава» (David Bowie: The Final Act). Кажется, это была пятая по счету документалка о музыканте... И, пожалуй, одна из лучших, если не лучшая. Мало того, что после фильма я вышла вся расчувствовавшаяся, так еще и месяц слушаю на повторе Where Are We Now? К моему удивлению (а может, и нет), она тоже про Германию. Берлин оставил большой след в

custom 5458587405227410252169👍6🔥4😍1

Signed Karin

6 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,760 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если в этот понедельник вы поймали себя на мысли, что пора в отпуск, то текст ниже точно для вас. Уже сотни раз я признавалась (и буду признаваться), что обожаю немецкий за его изящную иносказательность. Вот взять, к примеру, прилагательное urlaubsreif — дословно «созревший для отпуска». И нет, это не значит, что вы определились с датами, купили билеты и уже мысленно отключили все чаты. Это значит, что вы так задолб

custom 545853072883897833327😁158custom 54584473549338238032👍1

Signed Karin

1 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,670 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💜 Дайджест Подборка популярных постов в канале, которые вы могли пропустить, особенно если недавно на меня подписались. Для вашего удобства разбила все на рубрики: Разговорные слова и выражения обманчивая упаковка, зеленый цвет, тьма и сотня, упрямец, ничего особенного, упущенная радость, не блистать умом, вокруг да около, новые метлы, всякая маленькость, пахать как лошадь, основа основ, знать назубок Занимательна

❤‍🔥13👍65

Signed Karin

29 Jun 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,570 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что общего у футбола и птиц? На первый взгляд, казалось бы, — ничего. Так будет ровно до тех пор, пока вы не включите трансляцию с немецкими комментаторами. Несмотря на то, что матчи я сейчас смотрю постольку-поскольку, кое-что из футбольного жаргона все же периодически всплывает в памяти. За это спасибо моим немецким друзьям, которые растолковали пару-тройку выражений в далеком 2018-м. Уверена, вы хоть раз были св

43👍10🔥9

Signed Karin

22 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC≈2,170 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Жара в Германии — по версии известных поэтов, писателей и художников: Ольберфельд. Solingen. Кёльн. Ужасная жара, отымающая всё. Трактир Reinberg на берегу Рейна: нечисто, хотя сначала бросается в глаза. От жару не пошёл поклониться и Дому. В.А. Жуковский. Кёльн,14 июля 1832 В Мюнхене жарко и душно — в сем да будет заключено первое слово… Комната у меня великолепна, голубец неподдельный, но солнце меня тревожит всё

42🔥19❤‍🔥8👍1

Signed Karin

17 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,880 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

«Каждый встречный, кто попало, все, кому не лень» —

  1. Max und Moritz28%
  2. Hinz und Kunz18%
  3. Fritz und Hans54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥17😱865👍1

Signed Karin

15 Jun 2026, 12:18 UTC≈2,120 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мои студенты держат меня в курсе добрых новостей и заодно лингвистических прений. Наверняка вы уже читали, что на прошлой неделе самку карликового бегемота, родившуюся в мае в Берлинском зоопарке, назвали Brötchen — Булочкой. Конечно, этот факт, так же как и фотографии животного, мало кого оставит равнодушным, и я тому не исключение, скрывать не буду. Однако спустя несколько минут после прочтения новости я очутилас

36custom 5458587405227410252178❤‍🔥4👍3

Signed Karin

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kpfkino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz487 voters

«Каждый встречный, кто попало, все, кому не лень» —

  1. Max und Moritz28%
  2. Hinz und Kunz18%
  3. Fritz und Hans54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 333,005 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Немецкий язык
@deutschonline · 122,820
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kopfkino” (@kpfkino), 5,599 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kpfkino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.