Channel
@kozlowd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001931687739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kozlowd |
| Description | Место, где я хвастаюсь |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kozlowd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 162 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 162 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 15 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 34.0% | |
| custom 5294378491830086237 | 20 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5319299223521338293 | 14 | 9.33% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 8.67% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 8.00% | |
| custom 5235465481992809720 | 8 | 5.33% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 4.67% | |
| custom 5282926953672746252 | 4 | 2.67% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.667% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
когда я просил у вселенной много просмотров, я забыл уточнить, что их я хочу на новых видео, поэтому тикток решил дать мне +11 млн просмотров за неделю на видосы 2021го года, которые вообще не конвертят в тг-подписчика
❤6custom 52354654819928097205custom 52943784918300862375😁1
я ж вам рассказать забыл, что у нас уже чуть больше месяца назад появился собственный бот для генераций @wttool_bot! Ну, хвастаться особо не буду, ибо я для бота только название придумал и аватарку сделал сам, вся остальная работа проделана Вованом. Но в то же время, как тут не хвастаться, что у нас уже более 4000 пользователей, которые делают более 500 генераций в день. Да, таких ботов уже сотни в телеграме, но я сч…
❤8🔥6👍3
В начале каждого года размечаю ссылочки во всех сетях штф, чтобы отслеживать, сколько откуда приходит в телеграм. Так что делюсь статой за 2025 год. Пока самый худший показатель за всё время, это и из-за моей лени и из-за того, что занимался еще и другими направлениями и в самой большей степени из-за того, что теперь у нас всё кроме вк требует VPN. А во времена, когда на ютубе можно было кликабельную ссылку оставлять…
❤6🎉6😍3
С наступающим новым годом, подпищики! Валяюсь ща с температурой 38,3 и вот делюсь с вами нарезкой видосов этого года По кадрам можно увидеть, как в течение года меняется размер моих щёк и прическа Нонны Спасибо всем, кто рядом и не рядом, обнял❤️
❤8👍7🎉6
делаю тесты нового бота навайбкодил с чатгпт нейронку для распознавания шрифтов, которую моя RTX5080 обучала более 13 часов. Сами по себе нейронки по типу чатгпт, гемини и т.д не могут определить шрифт по картинке, поэтому была нужда обучить нейронку самостоятельно. Я в этом деле ничего не шарю, путём экспериментов и нескольких тестовых билдов пришёл к тому, что датасет для обучения состоял из ~4000 шрифтов по 1300 …
❤11🔥9custom 52943784918300862376custom 52354654819928097201
ало, бизнес? Да-да, деньги Тестировал новую нейронку Seedream 4 для нашего скрипта для фотошопа. Гугловская Nano-Banana будто лица всё-таки получше сохраняет. Кстати, за 9 дней продали уже более 200 копий скрипта.
custom 531929922352133829314😍4custom 52829269536727462523custom 52943784918300862372
Давно меня не было в уличных гонках или лонгрид о том, как я провёл лето: Чё-то оч давно сюда ничего не постил, была мини-депрессия из-за спада рынка рекламы в телеграме, падающих просмотров на постах и видосах, плохой погоды и просто чё-то было грустно, но может оно было и к лучшему, это позволило перефокусироваться на другие интересные направления, от которых я кайфанул. Купил себе фотик, ибо оч люблю фоткать что…
❤12custom 52943784918300862377🔥5👍3custom 52354654819928097202custom 52829269536727462521
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @kozlowd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 426,952 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“какаво же быть Данилой” (@kozlowd), 162 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kozlowd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.