3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,430–2,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 03:11
2,431
-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:07
2,436
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:17
2,436
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 28s
Average length
3m 54s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,347 reactions across 14 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
483
35.9%
❤
294
21.8%
❤🔥
140
10.4%
👍
101
7.50%
🎃
84
6.24%
custom 5296247506978484745
56
4.16%
👻
31
2.30%
🥰
26
1.93%
🤔
23
1.71%
💘
21
1.56%
👏
17
1.26%
👎
15
1.11%
🎉
11
0.817%
🤩
8
0.594%
😢
6
0.445%
🤣
4
0.297%
🏆
3
0.223%
💩
3
0.223%
😍
3
0.223%
🤝
3
0.223%
9 further kinds
15
1.11%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,347reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
105
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kozacustom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 October 2025 to 8 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Прекрасный РОЗЫГРЫШ от прекрасных дам к 8 марта!
В честь праздника - специальные подарки для вас, наши любимые красавицы 💓
УСЛОВИЯ:
❤️ Подписаться на каналы CHEREDRINK, Коза Custom, Smoke Heart, FSMOKE
❤️Нажать на кнопочку УЧАСТВОВАТЬ
❤️Запастись терпением
❤️Участвовать могут все, ведь если выиграет кавалер, он порадует милую даму дымным вечером? 👏
Что разыгрываем?
🔘1 место - Бокс с подарками от Тани
🔴2 место - Бо…
Я когда в Сочи гонял, то я у Стаса спиздил чашку от Козы.
На самом деле, он мне её подарил т.к у него было их две штуки. Стас, спасибо тебе.
Ну а что? Хоть она и б.у, но зато красивая на мой взгляд. Делалась она для бренда Nuggle в какой-то из John Calliano.
А как вам эта чашечка?
Spectrum отправил Козу и Вишню на кухню🔥
Помнишь тот бомбовый бокс Spectrum с йогуртницей? Так вот Таня схватила меня за рога — и мы взялись за готовку!
Вашему вниманию кулинарное шоу СМАК СМОК, на котором мы с CHEREDRINK приготовили домашний йогурт и вкуснейший микс с Milky Yogurt 🥊
🟥 YouTube
🟦 ВК
дегустация была самым волнительным моментом 🍫
а ты уже пробовал йогурт Спектрума?
РОЗЫГРЫШ SPECTRUM X KOЗА CUSTOM
Неважно, что тебе ближе - Тыквенный спас или Хэллоуин, важно, чем ты наполнишь этот праздник!
Мы предлагаем победителю:
Эксклюзивную чашу, расписанную в единственном экземпляре, блогер-бокс с лимитированным ароматом Sweet Pumpkin и новинки бренда в 25г!
Для участия в розыгрыше не обязательно выпрашивать конфеты у соседей, достаточно просто подписаться на каналы:
1. Spectrum Tobacc…
Бренд-открытие
или как я впервые попробовала Bliss
мне казалось, вся вирджиния обречена быть сиропистой и это тот момент, с которым ты миришься в угоду вкусу, но тут влетает Блисс с двух ног, дает мне пощечину и кричит «А ВОТ ЭТО НЕ ХОЧЕШЬ???»
потрясающая нарезка, минимум сиропа, отсутствие привкуса сырья (без шуток, его нет) и яркая аромка
+ у меня ноль вопросов к попаданию во вкус — я получила то, что заявлено
а…
Посмотрела ролик Hookah Battle с битвой магазинов из разных стран за лучший интерьер
Я думала, вершина стиля — это Терпкий, но оказалось, магазин может выглядеть и так:
11:27 США
размеры и ассортимент впечатляют
19:45 Испания
светлый лакшери интерьер
36:27 Германия
это. просто. шок.
43:35 Терпкий в Мск
48:50 Южная Африка
меня не впечатлило, но может тебе вкатит
было интересно глянуть, как вообще все это выгляди…
Лимитированный аромат от Spectrum
Сладкая тыква
вкус настоящей тыквы, плотный, в меру яркий, не уходящий в откровенное гастро, и со сладостью реального плода — 10/10
получилось ещё лучше, чем было в уже выведенном аромате!
собрать тебе чумовой микс с тыквой??
@spectrum_tbc
❤🔥25custom 529624750697848474513❤10🔥5👍3🍾2💘2🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kozacustom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 852,877 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kozacustom named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@smokeheartchel named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@cheredrinkovoe named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@spectrum_tbc named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@hookahbattleofficial named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@severniy_tc named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коза Custom” (@kozacustom), 2,431 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kozacustom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
