Channel
@kouroshgerami2025
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
971subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002260304192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kouroshgerami2025 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kouroshgerami2025 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 971 | +6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 965 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 968 | +11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 957 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 959 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 963 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 964 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
281 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 159 | 56.6% | |
| 👍 | 69 | 24.6% | |
| 👏 | 44 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.78% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.356% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌸نقد اندیشه اقتصادی ایت الله مرتضی #مطهری ✅ شهید مطهری هم فلسفه ماتریالیستی مارکس را رد میکند ، هم در مخالفت با سرمایه داری سخن میگوید تا آنجا که در کتاب «نظری به نظام اقتصادی اسلام » مینویسد : «اصول و منطق مارکس ، سرمایه داری را تطهیر و تقویت میکند » به عقیده ایشان با تکیه بر تئوری ارزش-کار مطرح شده توسط مارکس نمیتوانیم ناعادلانه بودن نظام سرمایه داری را اثبات کنیم و در همان کتاب مینویسد : «اگر ارزش هرچیز م…
👍4❤3👏3
🌸 با درود بنا به درخواست عزیزان ، نقد آرای اقتصادی را در کانال ادامه خواهیم داد در ادامه مطالب کانال به اندیشه مرتضی مطهری و سپس علی شریعتی و نهایتا ابولحسن بنی صدر و شاید برخی دیگر خواهیم پرداخت ...
❤14
🌸 مسئله اصلی انسان چیزهایی که برایش رخ میدهد نیست، بلکه داوری و نگرش او نسبت به آنهاست. *اپیکتتوس #رواقیون
🔥5❤4👏1
🌸 افکار پوسیده روشنفکر نما ها ! کمونیست ها هم خواستند کالا را تبدیل به حق کنند ! اما اول حق آزادی سلب شد ، سپس کالا کمیاب و بعد بی کیفیت شد ، رفته رفته تولید کشور نابود شد ، سپس بیکاری گسترش پیدا کرد ، اردوگاه کار اجباری تشکیل شد و فقر و قحطی همه جا را فراگرفت
👏12👎1
🌸باور درست ( تاکید میکنم حتی باور درست ! ) ، اگر از سر تقلید باشد فضیلت نیست کسی که بدون #استدلال به حقیقت رسیده، هنوز راه حقیقت را نیاموخته است ...
👍7❤4
📌نقد عبدالکریم سروش را از همین متن توهین آمیز شروع میکنیم دکتر غنی نژاد گفت شریعتی به #پروفسور_شاندل ارجاع میداده است که این شاندل همان خود اوست ! ( شاندل در فرانسوی یعنی شمع که مخفف نام خود او یعنی " شریعتی مزینانی علی " است ! ) در تایید و تاکید بر سخن دکتر غنی نژاد ، شریعتی نه یک بار ، بلکه در بسیاری جاها ، آنهم نه فقط در سخنرانی هایش ، بلکه در کتابهایش به صورت مکتوب به شاندل ارجاع داده است ! اما به نقد سروش…
👍12👏7❤6
File, posted without a caption
👏7
📌سینه چاک کردن عبدالکریم سروش در دفاع از شریعتی ( مارکسیست و صد البته شارلاتان ) و توهین به موسی غنی نژاد در ادامه فقط به نقد همین متن خواهیم پرداخت این نقد میتواند در "مغالطه شناسی" برای شما عزیزان جالب توجه باشد !
👏10👍1
📌نقد اندیشه التقاطی #سروش و جریان روشنفکری دینی و صد البته #شریعتی مارکسیست را در کانال قرار خواهیم داد سخن بسیار است !
👍14
🌸 مواضع اقتصادی نادرست شهید بهشتی ! ✅ در صورت مشروح مذاکرات مجلس خبرگان ، در بررسی نهایی قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، شهید بهشتی چنین میگوید : « اقتصاد ، دولتی شدنش از نظر مدیریت خطرناک است و نه از نظر مالکیتی که نخواهد به استناد مالکیت مدیریت کند » یعنی از نظر ایشان مدیریت دولتی خطرناک است نه مالکیت دولتی ! در جای دیگری در پاسخ به مدافعان مالکیت خصوصی و رنجش سرمایه داران و احتمال خروجشان از کشور میگوید : «…
👍9❤5
🌸مواضع اقتصادی عجیب ایت الله طالقانی ! وی بر این باور بود که حق مالکیت پذیرفتنی است اما گسترده و نا محدود نباید باشد ! در کتاب «اسلام و مالکیت در مقایسه با نظام های اقتصادی غرب» چنین استدلال میکند : مالکیت نسبی و محدود میباشد ، چون معنای مالکیت اختیار و قدرت در تصرف است و قدرت و اختیار انسانی محدود است نمیتواند خود را مالک مطلق و متصرف تام الاختیار بداند . این قدرت مطلق و تصرف کامل و نافذ فقط برای خداوندی است ک…
❤12👍6👏2
🌸 بخش دوم پادکست علل رشد اقتصادی شگفت انگیز دهه 40 چه بود ؟ چرا رشد اقتصادی دهه ۴۰ تداوم نیافت ؟ اشتباهات اقتصادی پهلوی دوم چه بود ؟ الزامات توسعه چیست ؟ تفاوت مدرنیزاسیون با مدرنیته چیست ؟ @kouroshgerami2025
❤13👎1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kouroshgerami2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتاب خوانی و آگاهی” (@kouroshgerami2025), 971 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kouroshgerami2025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.