Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Коттоблог

Channel

Коттоблог

@kottoblog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,300subscribers

+953 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318202184
TypeChannel
Username@kottoblog
Created7 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kottoblog

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,34718,30017,823.56 August 2026 — 17,347 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,646 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,714 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,729 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,732 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,740 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,739 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,745 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,753 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,795 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,842 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,841 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,833 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,853 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,865 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,864 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,863 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,866 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,888 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,916 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,007 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,052 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,071 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,081 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,079 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,103 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,111 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,113 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,129 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,125 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,121 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,108 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,176 subscribers25 September 2026 — 18,300 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +953. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,204–18,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:2018,300+124
19 Sept 2026, 07:2018,176+68
16 Sept 2026, 19:3818,108-13
14 Sept 2026, 20:2018,121-4
13 Sept 2026, 09:4118,125-4
11 Sept 2026, 11:1718,129+16
8 Sept 2026, 15:3618,113+2
5 Sept 2026, 11:2018,111+8
3 Sept 2026, 14:0018,103+24
2 Sept 2026, 04:1318,079-2
1 Sept 2026, 03:0418,081+10
31 Aug 2026, 04:2518,071+19
30 Aug 2026, 05:0618,052+45
29 Aug 2026, 04:1518,007+91
28 Aug 2026, 01:2317,916+28
27 Aug 2026, 00:5317,888+22
25 Aug 2026, 22:4317,866+3
24 Aug 2026, 22:2517,863-1
23 Aug 2026, 07:2817,864-1
21 Aug 2026, 21:0717,865first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.7%
avg views ÷ 18,300 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,550
1 post measured
Reaction rate
18.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held24 (16 April 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total8,550
Reactions total1,567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

54,063 reactions across 24 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯35,67666.0%
👍9,33317.3%
❤3,2245.96%
🔥1,6983.14%
🤣1,1392.11%
👏1,0882.01%
😁9631.78%
😢2550.472%
❤‍🔥1950.361%
🤝1200.222%
⚡1150.213%
🤔850.157%
🎅270.05%
🙊200.037%
😡190.035%
😎180.033%
☃140.026%
🆒140.026%
🦄140.026%
🤷‍♂130.024%
3 further kinds330.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,297
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 24 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
181
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kottoblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC≈8,550 views1,567 reactions58 Starsread 3 September 2026

У нас сейчас активно рекламируется электронное голосование. Дескать, чего тебе ходить куда-то? Тыкнул прямо в телефоне и исполнил гражданский долг! Я помню, как вводили это голосование, как рассказывали, насколько оно современное и перспективное. И в тот день, когда его ввели, встал ровно один вопрос: а зачем теперь нужны депутаты вообще и их выборы в частности? Зачем голосовать за тех, кто будет голосовать за законы…

💯1,210👏191❤100😁54💊12

Signed Ivan K.

26 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈28,600 views2,339 reactions181 Starsread 3 September 2026

Знаете, я понять не могу, зачем вообще нужна Дума в нынешнем ее виде. Изначально задумка-то хорошая. Вот есть разделение властей, а Дума - законодательная власть. Люди выбирают туда своих представителей, которые знают, чем живут люди, представляют их интересы и принимают законы, которые нужны именно их избирателям. А что мы видим сейчас? 1. Из 450 депутатов 310 принадлежат одной партии. То есть их в 2 раза больше, ч…

💯1,840🔥328❤117😁39⚡15

Signed Ivan K.

19 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈20,700 views2,157 reactions62 Starsread 3 September 2026

Через месяц у нас выборы депутатов. Поэтому государство трудится без устали. Ведь до выборов должны дойти только правильные, калиброванные депутаты. Разве можно давать холопам выбирать того, кого они хотят? Нет, конечно, у нас же демократия! Значит демос не должен ничего решать. Поэтому они то Яблоко сняли, то отдельных депутатов. Одного вообще за то, что он шрифты не те использовал. Кипит работа! И меня просто пораж…

💯1,560👍346🔥142❤93⚡16

Signed Ivan K.

12 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈30,000 views2,666 reactions167 Starsread 3 September 2026

Написал я недавно про депутатов, пустивших себе на премии 2 ярда бюджетных денег и их доходы. Ну там про Володина с почти миллиардом на счетах, про Симановского с 17,5 миллиардами и других их коллег по опасному бизнесу. А еще про 155 долларовых миллиардеров, число которых с каждым годом растет. И это все несмотря на довольно тревожное время. Казалось бы, ну дичь же дикая. Но нет. Я получил, наверное, несколько десятк…

💯2,010👍350❤130🔥105👏71

Signed Ivan K.

5 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈61,100 views2,893 reactions44 Starsread 3 September 2026

Я привык, когда с телевизора разные "патриоты" на зарплате постоянно рассказывают про "такое время". Эти-то ясно, работа. Но часто пишут и обычные люди, дескать, все у тебя правильно в статьях, все по делу, но не стоит писать подобное "в такое время". "В такое время", дескать, надо потерпеть, помолчать, а вот потом, когда это самое "такое время" закончится - тогда можно и говорить, тогда можно со всех и спросить. И у…

💯2,170👍400❤159🔥121😢43

Signed Ivan K.

29 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC≈39,400 views2,946 reactions40 Starsread 3 September 2026

Вот стоит написать про какую-то проблему в стране, как тут же прибегут активисты и начнут орать: провокатор, враг, нытик, паникер, посадить, расстрелять, хватит стонать, терпи, не раскачивай. И меня не перестает поражать такой подход. Казалось бы, любого нормального человека волнует жизнь в его стране, проблемы в ней. И он будет о них говорить. Меня не волнует Трамп, жена Макрона и госдолг США. Меня волнует Россия и …

💯2,140👍439❤161🔥137👏69

Signed Ivan K.

22 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC≈35,200 views2,225 reactions138 Starsread 3 September 2026

Больше всего в ситуации с топливом меня раздражает, как вину начали сваливать на граждан, скупающих бензин. Сперва это начало делать государство, рассказавшее, что у него, как всегда, все прекрасно, а проблему создают паникеры. А потом и другие граждане подхватили. Да, государство тупо натравило граждан друг на друга, обвинив одних в бедах других. А люди сейчас и так задроченные и озлобленные. И понеслось. Даже гречк…

💯1,750👍315❤129⚡21✍10

Signed Ivan K.

15 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈37,200 views2,419 reactions31 Starsread 3 September 2026

На прошлой неделе нам сообщили подряд две прекрасные новости. Сперва выяснилось, что Володин на закрытом заседании рассказал, как они в Госдуме сэкономили 2 миллиарда и выплатят из них премии всем депутатам. А через день Володин пожаловался, что кто-то растрепал про это и вся страна узнала про их премии. И ему пришлось оправдываться, что депутат, оказывается, по статусу равен министру, а получает сильно меньше. Депут…

👍1,370💯871❤101⚡52❤‍🔥25

Signed Ivan K.

8 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈31,200 views2,594 reactions41 Starsread 3 September 2026

По интернетам разошлось видео с охотником из Якутии, который поехал в Африку исполнять мечту - убивать льва. Видео просто эпичное. Лев мирно спит. В 30 метрах от него убожество с винтовкой на треноге (!), через оптический прицел (!!!) выцеливает льва. Рядом с "охотником" гид с винтовкой, нацеленной на льва. Страхует, если этот и в упор по спящему промажет. Это как в зоопарке "охотиться". А снимает все жена "охотника"…

💯1,810👍518❤161😢73❤‍🔥32

Signed Ivan K.

1 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈35,100 views2,428 reactions50 Starsread 3 September 2026

Прям не везет нашим строителям "суверенного интернета". Сперва Эппл удалил из своего магазина "национальный мессенджер" Max. А на днях еще и Вконтактик. И понеслось гoвнo по трубам! Песков сообщил: "Речь идет о десятках миллионов людей, интересы которых затрагивают подобные странные, по меньшей мере, решения корпорации Apple." (с) Зампред комитета Госдумы по информполитике Марина Ким: "Логика одна - усложнить жизнь о…

💯1,820👍338❤177👏82⚡11

Signed Ivan K.

29 Jun 2026, 13:37 UTC≈46,700 views2,123 reactions21 Starsread 3 September 2026

После уничтожения СССР долгие годы страна-бензоколонка не делала почти ничего, кроме бензина. А теперь и с бензином, как бы, вон что. Это надо обладать какими-то незаурядными талантами, чтобы страну, производившую все, от часов, велосипедов и фонариков до машин, самолетов и авианесущих крейсеров, довести до уровня бензоколонки с табличкой "бензина нет". Где даже табличка напечатана в Китае.

💯1,700👏201👍160🤔44😎18

Signed Ivan K.

24 Jun 2026, 12:46 UTC≈32,600 views2,391 reactions35 Starsread 3 September 2026

На прошлой неделе на столицу случился налет беспилотников. Говорят, самый массовый за все время. Прилетело даже в нефтезавод да так, что видно было не только со всей столицы, но и из окрестностей. Люди, видя такое, естественно, паникуют. А как иначе? Ну тупо страшно, когда взрывы, стрельба, черное небо. И тут на арену выступило родное государство ртом главного пропагандиста Соловьева. И решило успокоить граждан: «Все…

💯1,740👍331❤273😢28😡19

Signed Ivan K.

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @kottoblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Малдер расскажет
@malderstory · 25,604
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коттоблог” (@kottoblog), 18,300 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kottoblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.