кэсси на корточках
❤64custom 525594757114207471719🥰7custom 52535770111876884302
Signed alena

Channel
@kotocaferu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,577subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001601676147 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kotocaferu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kotocaferu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 4,577 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 4,578 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 4,582 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 4,586 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 4,586 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,761 |
| Reactions total | 2,445 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,445 reactions across 27 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,385 | 56.6% | |
| custom 5255947571142074717 | 299 | 12.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 288 | 11.8% | |
| 🙏 | 211 | 8.63% | |
| 🥰 | 96 | 3.93% | |
| custom 5253577011187688430 | 37 | 1.51% | |
| custom 5251299437275259094 | 30 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5253748066850187560 | 20 | 0.818% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 0.818% | |
| 🤬 | 17 | 0.695% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 0.491% | |
| custom 5255704166755475136 | 8 | 0.327% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.327% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 0.286% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.164% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.123% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,445reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kotocaferu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
кэсси на корточках
❤64custom 525594757114207471719🥰7custom 52535770111876884302
Signed alena
Иосиф сердито сидит на коленях
❤80custom 525594757114207471717custom 52535770111876884304custom 52557041667554751361
Скоро Биба будет у нас!
❤70🤩8🥰8custom 52559475711420747177
Апекс не впечатлён. Ну такое, говорит котик.
custom 525594757114207471739❤🔥29❤19custom 52557041667554751367custom 52537480668501875603
Листику пофиг на скандалы
❤73custom 525594757114207471724❤🔥6
в общем, Мария пожаловалась на нас в СББЖ, в среду они к нам придут с проверкой и угрожают закрыть нас на 10 дней. если закроют, будем жаловаться вам и плакать. по фактам. кошка не укусила, а поцарапала, и не ребенка, а Марию ( у нас есть видео). через царапину бешенством заразиться нельзя. прививку от бешенства ставят единократно. В процессе игры, если с кошкой играть неосторожно, она может и поцарапать, и прикус…
🙏112🤬17custom 52535770111876884307❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
❤27
Интересная неделя в котокафе «Котеешная» 🐾 Тёплые встречи, творчество и много котиков! ⚡ Во вторник, 11 августа, в 19:00— концерт на цитре кото + мини-лекция от ансамбля UMI Традиционная цитра кото — один из символов как древней, так и современной японской музыкальной культуры. Ну и инструмент, который называется КОТО — определённо стоит внимания! 😼 Оплата: По по тарифу буднего дня котокафе ⚡В среду, 12 августа, в…
❤23❤🔥10
Мандарин и Флора - история любви
❤122🥰33custom 525594757114207471714❤🔥8
Photo, posted without a caption
❤31custom 52535770111876884303👍1
11 августа (вт) — концерт на цитре кото + мини-лекция от ансамбля UMI Традиционная цитра кото — один из символов как древней, так и современной японской музыкальной культуры. Инструмент появился в VIII веке и дошёл до наших дней практически без изменений. Изначально кото — инструмент музыки гагаку, которая исполнялась при императорском дворе, но постепенно инструмент распространился во всех слоях общества, и в очень…
❤21custom 52535770111876884303
нам долго сдавали всякие анализы, пока не подтвердилось, что наш диабетыш - Биба, полностью здоров и может к нам приехать. это большое счастье, потому что сейчас мальчик сидит и уже очень давно в клеточке. а людей он очень любит. у нас пока не было диабетиков, и хоть сейчас Биба в стабильном состоянии, инсулин не нужен, все равно это новый уровень ответственности. надеюсь, вы все нас поддерживаете.
custom 525594757114207471754❤51❤🔥14custom 52535770111876884306
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @kotocaferu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 543,502 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Котокафе Котики и Люди” (@kotocaferu), 4,577 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kotocaferu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.