Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ботанутый Костя

Channel

Ботанутый Костя

@kostik_neuro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,709subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312326012
TypeChannel
Username@kostik_neuro
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kostik_neuro

Growth

1,6281,7091,668.57 August 2026 — 1,628 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,628 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,629 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,635 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,648 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,647 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,652 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,651 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,663 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,661 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,662 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,660 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,709 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,616–1,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:551,709+49
4 Sept 2026, 15:381,660-2
1 Sept 2026, 05:171,662+1
28 Aug 2026, 21:121,661-2
26 Aug 2026, 07:151,663+12
23 Aug 2026, 12:171,651-1
20 Aug 2026, 08:051,652+5
17 Aug 2026, 18:371,647-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:181,648+13
11 Aug 2026, 05:261,635+6
8 Aug 2026, 10:011,629+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:481,628no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:531,628first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

295 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11137.6%
🔥10836.6%
🐳4214.2%
custom 5217608395250485583165.42%
🎉113.73%
🤔62.03%
😁10.339%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC337 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что-то QweN - СЛАБ! Как у вас с ним дела обстоят?

6

4 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC415 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

DeepSeek V4 Flash - почти бесплатная модель для вайб-кодинга. Но способна ли она реально конкурировать с дорогими топами? 👀 Я прогнал её через 5 тестов: ➡️кинематографичный сайт, ➡️MacOS-приложение, ➡️работу с API, ➡️конфигуратор и полноценную корзину. Использовал новый набор тестов - теперь модели должны не только создавать проекты с нуля, но и нормально дорабатывать уже существующий код. Результат получился очен

14🐳2

4 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC431 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По качеству видео будет ужасным 😂 записываю в таких условиях

3😁1

3 Aug 2026, 01:22 UTC479 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Моя первая звезда на github) Кто еще не знает, я выложил исходники всех тестов для тестирования и сравнения нейнронок на гитхаб. Если вам нравятся мои тесты, буду рад благодарности в виде звездочек) Тест нейронки: https://github.com/KostiKoNeuro/vibe-coding-benchmark-2026 Сравнение нейронок: https://github.com/KostiKoNeuro/Quick-AI-model-comparison-tests

19🐳8🤔4🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 01:51 UTC527 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Господа, я в отпуске) Нооо, сейчас сяду делать тесты на deepseek v4 flash обновлённым, может хоть одно видео успею сделать в отпуске 🤣 Всех люблю ❤️

30🎉11🐳6🔥3custom 52176083952504855832

31 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC625 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новые тесты готовы 👀 Последние дни я как раз занимался разработкой нового набора тестов для нейронок - и оказалось, что придумать их нормально вообще не так просто 😅 Нужно найти баланс: чтобы тесты не были унылыми «сделай todo-лист», но при этом реально были сложными и показывали разницу между моделями. В итоге получилось 5 этапов: ➡️кинематографичный сайт, ➡️Windows-приложение, ➡️работа с реальным API ➡️и две после

🔥11🐳6🤔2custom 52176083952504855831

29 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC692 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Часто задаваемый вопрос и предложение)

🔥203

29 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC700 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

GPT 5.6 SOL всё? 😬 Новый Claude Opus 5 я сразу отправил против одного из сильнейших GPT - и результат получился куда интереснее, чем я ожидал. Одинаковые условия. Один победитель. Смотрим, действительно ли OpenAI сегодня унизили 👇 🎬СМОТРЕТЬ. 🎬

🐳9

29 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTC680 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня выйдет сравнение 5.6 Sol и Opus 5 на новых тестах)

🔥96custom 52176083952504855833

27 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC724 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какие нейронки еще схлеснём на новых тестах?

  1. Opus 5 vs Fable 538%
  2. Opus 5 vs Gpt 5.6 Sol72%
  3. Ваш вариант(в комментариях)6%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥32

27 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC712 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇳 Kimi K3 против Qwen 3.8 Max: какая нейросеть реально сильнее? Запилил жесткое сравнение двух топовых китайских моделей в реальных задачах и кодинге. Снял подробный разбор, а все промпты, исходники и результаты бенчмарков выложил на GitHub! ➡️ Забирайте тесты и промпты тут: КЛИК (Буду рад вашей поддержке - заходите по ссылке и ставьте ⭐️ (Star) репозиторию, если материал был полезен! ) ➡️СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО⬅️

🔥11🐳3custom 52176083952504855833

27 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC671 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня будет ролик со сравнением Kimi и QWEN) p.s. Промпты и все ассеты итд будут отныне храниться на github. (Ссылку оставлю под новым видосом)

🔥64custom 52176083952504855834

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kostik_neuro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTCAnonymous Poll95 voters

Какие нейронки еще схлеснём на новых тестах?

  1. Opus 5 vs Fable 538%
  2. Opus 5 vs Gpt 5.6 Sol72%
  3. Ваш вариант(в комментариях)6%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ботанутый Костя” (@kostik_neuro), 1,709 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kostik_neuro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.