Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Космоскай | Вселенная глюкофонов и хэндпанов

@kosmosky_workshop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,727subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710030923
TypeChannel
Username@kosmosky_workshop
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kosmosky_workshop

Growth

1,7221,7271,724.57 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,727 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,721–1,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 14:071,727+5
8 Aug 2026, 06:311,722-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:031,723no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:071,723first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 1,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (24 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,643
Reactions total311
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 34s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

311 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17656.6%
6420.6%
👍309.65%
🤩196.11%
🥰123.86%
😱61.93%
🎉41.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC41 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как же красиво в этом глюкофоне отражается небо и деревья 💙 Этой весной мы выпустили целую линейку глюкофонов из нержавеющей стали и с тех пор возим их практически везде. В снежные горы, на фестивали, к рекам и озёрам. Нержавейка не боится ни мороза, ни влаги, ни перепадов температуры. На видео звучит Шелтон 15. Тембр у него более воздушный и яркий, чем у версии из обычной стали. При этом те же 15 нот, насыщенное н

4 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC183 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кавер на самую известную песню Radiohead — Creep. Наш друг Эрнест Симонян вместе с Еленой Поповой немного переосмыслили эту композицию. Получился мистический медитативный эмбиент без гитарного рёва и грохота барабанов. Идём слушать: 📺 YouTube 💙 ВКонтакте Как вам такая интерпретация Creep?

🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC209 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍12🔥115🤩4😱4

3 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC238 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

3 уникальных глюкофона, которых вы ещё не видели 👀 Мы постоянно экспериментируем со звучанием, материалами и формой, создавая что-то новое и необычное. Многие из этих инструментов мы даже не успеваем показать. В сегодняшней подборке: • самый-самый басовый глюкофон (прототип Шелтона в До миноре) • двухсторонний глюкофон на 19 нот • Woody Wave — мы соединили верх New Wave с деревянным корпусом Напишите в комментари

🔥16🤩53👍3🥰3

31 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC315 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Песня, с которой глюкофон путешествует по миру 🌎 Fish Named Beanie — композиция, которую фингерстайл-гитарист Александр Мисько написал специально для New Wave 15. Слушаем и восхищаемся!

🔥216

29 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC394 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чудесные трансформации глюкофона. Сегодня тестируем очередную педаль эффектов и улетаем в космос.

🔥2410😱2🎉1

27 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC406 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

И снова любимая рубрика — «Сравни глюкофоны». Как звучат обычная и нержавеющая сталь? Сравниваем на примере глюкофона Шелтон. Напишите, слышите ли вы разницу и какой вариант вам нравится больше.

🔥104🤩1

26 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC425 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Это было невероятно круто! 5 наших глюкофонов на главной сцене фестиваля Архстояние. 17 крутейших музыкантов как оркестр. Несколько тысяч человек у сцены. Дирижер и композитор — Глеб Андрианов

🔥17🤩42🎉2🥰2

25 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC342 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Немножко инофрмации о композиторе для знакомства — Глеб Адрианов

🔥102👍2

25 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC311 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥123🤩3🎉1

24 Jul 2026, 16:10 UTC432 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кажется, мы сделали то, чего еще никто не делал 💜 Сыграли сразу на четырех глюкофонах «Поход» Эдуарда Артемьева. Три инструмента ведут басовую и гармоническую линию, а четвертый — мелодию. В результате глюкофон раскрывается совсем иначе: не как сольный инструмент, а как часть полноценного ансамбля. Возможно, это один из первых шагов к новому формату исполнения — глюкофонному квартету… а может быть, однажды и к цел

🔥3123👍4🥰3🤩2

24 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC347 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Залезли в цветы и кое-что записали, скоро покажем. Играли сразу на четырех глюкофонах, было очень красиво и беспрецедентно!) Просто скажите, что ждёте 👀

🔥19👍96🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kosmosky_workshop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 575,450 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Космоскай | Вселенная глюкофонов и хэндпанов” (@kosmosky_workshop), 1,727 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kosmosky_workshop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.